Insights
Firm News

Farella Braun + Martel Client Fetzer Vineyards Prevails in Trademark Trial

September 21, 2017 Announcement

SAN FRANCISCO (September 21, 2017): Following a week-long trial, California Federal Judge William H. Orrick ruled in favor of Farella Braun + Martel LLP client Fetzer Vineyards, a Hopland-based winery known for pioneering sustainable winemaking. The case arose from allegations by Sazerac Company, Inc. that the label of Fetzer Vineyards’ 1000 Stories zinfandel, which features an image of a buffalo and uses the phrase “bourbon barrel aged,” somehow infringed certain trademarks related to or the trade dress associated with Sazerac’s Buffalo Trace bourbon brand. 

In his decision, Judge Orrick soundly rejected all of Sazerac’s claims, writing “in the final analysis, this case was not close.” Judge Orrick found that Sazerac “failed to present any evidence that Sazerac’s buffalo logo creates the same commercial impression as Fetzer’s buffalo.” He also dismissed  Sazerac’s contention that Fetzer Vineyards adopted the 1000 Stories trade dress with the intent of causing consumer confusion, finding both that Sazerac failed to present any evidence to support that contention and that Fetzer Vineyards “presented compelling evidence of the story behind its decision to select the American buffalo [as the icon for] its 1000 Stories brand.”  Judge Orrick concluded that “there is no likelihood of confusion between Sazerac’s Buffalo Trace and Fetzer Vineyards’ 1000 Stories.” 

Sazerac originally sought monetary damages, but in an April 2017 ruling, the court granted partial summary judgment, dismissing Sazerac’s damages claims. The court also partially granted Fetzer Vineyards' request for judgment on the infringement claims, trimming several of the asserted trademarks from the case.

Farella’s Robert C. Holtzapple served as Fetzer Vineyards’ lead counsel, trying the case with Steven R. Disharoon of Wood Smith Henning & Berman LLP.

(Sazerac Co. Inc. v. Fetzer Vineyards, 3:15-cv-04618, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California)

Farella Braun + Martel represents clients throughout the United States and abroad in sophisticated business transactions and complex commercial, civil and criminal litigation. Farella lawyers are known for their imaginative legal solutions to today’s business challenges, dynamism and intellectual creativity. With an unwavering service ethic and interdisciplinary team approach, the firm is committed to advancing clients' objectives in the most effective, coordinated and efficient manner. Founded in 1962, the firm is headquartered in San Francisco and maintains an office in the Napa Valley focused on the wine industry.

Contact:
Cheryl Loof
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
415.954.4433 / [email protected]
Follow us on Twitter: @FarellaBraun

Firm Highlights

News

Farella Wins Complete Defense Ruling at Trial for Smart Meter Technology Company

Northern California legal powerhouse Farella Braun + Martel secured a complete defense victory for a smart meter technology company following a two-week bench trial in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of California...

Read More
News

Scraping Battles: Meta Loses Legal Effort to Halt Harvesting of Personal Profiles

Alex Reese spoke to Matt Fleischer-Black of  Cybersecurity Law Report about the Meta v. Bright Data decision and its impact on U.S. scraping case law. Read the article here (paywall or trial).

Read More
Publication

Wire Fraud Victims Have New Reporting Factors After Ciminelli

Originally published by  Bloomberg Law . Courts around the country have seen an influx of challenges to indictments and convictions since the US Supreme Court’s unanimous decision in  Ciminelli v. United States  last May...

Read More
Publication

Compelling Employees to Arbitration Suddenly Has Less of an Upside

On July 17, the California Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in Adolph v. Uber Techs Inc., as to whether employees still have standing to sue for "non-individual" PAGA claims when they have been...

Read More
Publication

Disputes Between Shareholders May Not Be Governed by Fiduciary Duties but Could Be Covered by Insurance

(As published in Private Company Director ) Disputes regarding ownership interests often arise in the context of closely held corporations, particularly when directors, officers, or majority shareholders sell or acquire ownership interests in the...

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Earns 2024 Best Law Firms® Rankings

Read More
Publication

Major Decision Affects Law of Scraping and Online Data Collection, Meta Platforms v. Bright Data

On January 23, 2024, the court in Meta Platforms Inc. v. Bright Data Ltd. , Case No. 3:23-cv-00077-EMC (N.D. Cal.), issued a summary judgment ruling with potentially wide-ranging ramifications for the law of scraping and...

Read More
News

Sarah Good Honored Among Most Influential Women in Bay Area Business

Read More
Publication

Reporting Dispute Claims Within Closely Held Wineries

Many wineries operate as closely held companies, meaning they’re owned by an individual or small group of shareholders, who are often members of the same family. Disputes regarding ownership interests can arise, particularly when directors...

Read More
News

Farella 2024 Partner Elevations: Cynthia Castillo and Greg LeSaint

Northern California legal powerhouse Farella Braun + Martel is pleased to announce the election of two lawyers to partnership effective Jan. 1: Cynthia Castillo and Greg LeSaint. “We are thrilled to elevate Cynthia and...

Read More