Insights
Publications

San Francisco Enacts Nation’s First Fully Paid Parental Leave Ordinance

5/5/2016 Articles

Effective January 1, 2017, San Francisco is scheduled to become the first city in the United States to require fully paid parental leave. The Paid Parental Leave Ordinance (the Ordinance) was passed unanimously by San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors, and promptly signed by Mayor Edwin Lee on April 21, 2016. Under the new law, employers must provide covered employees with six weeks of fully paid leave to bond with their new child in the first 12 months following birth, adoption, or foster care placement. The Ordinance phases in this paid leave requirement based on the employer’s size, with employers with 50 or more employees starting January 1, 2017, employers with 35 or more employees starting July 1, 2017, and employers with 20 or more employees starting January 1, 2018. The Ordinance does not apply to employers with less than 20 employees.

The Ordinance supplements the state’s already existing California Paid Family Leave law. Under that state-wide law, employees currently receive 55% of their pay, up to a maximum $1,129 per week, for six weeks of leave. That payment comes from the State Disability Insurance (SDI) program, and to be eligible an employee must have had SDI deductions withheld. Notably, Governor Jerry Brown signed a new measure on April 11, 2016 to raise coverage to up to 70% of an individual’s pay for those earning close to minimum wage, with workers making up to $108,000 annually receiving 60% of their pay. These new rates take effect in 2018. California’s paid family leave runs concurrently with the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and the California Family Rights Act (CFRA), which provide twelve weeks of unpaid leave.

The Ordinance will require employers to pay the 45% gap currently left open under California’s Paid Family Leave law. When the new state law raises the coverage rate above 55%, the employer’s obligation to pay the remaining wages will decrease proportionately. The Ordinance caps the amount an employer is required to pay if the employee has reached California’s maximum weekly cap. Thus, for example, under the 2016 rate an employer’s maximum weekly contribution under the Ordinance would be capped at $924 per week. An employer may require that an employee first use up to two weeks of the employee’s unused vacation to cover its paid leave obligations.

To be covered under the Ordinance, the employee must have begun employment with the employer at least 180 days prior to the start of the leave period, must be performing at least eight hours of work per week, at least 40% of which are within San Francisco, and be eligible under the Paid Family Leave law.

Should an employee voluntarily leave his or her employment within 90 days after their leave ends, the employer may request in writing that the employee reimburse the full amount received under the Ordinance.

The Ordinance also provides that reducing an employee’s wages or terminating an employee within 90 days of a request for leave gives rise to a rebuttable presumption that it was done to reduce or avoid the employer’s payment obligations. Thus, in a wrongful termination, retaliation, discrimination, or accommodation lawsuit, the employer would bear the burden to demonstrate that the wage reduction or termination was not to avoid payment of these wages.

Employers should prepare to implement the terms of the Ordinance by identifying whether they are a qualifying employer and, if so, identifying the workforce eligible for these benefits. Covered employers must be ready to implement these policies and benefits by the phase-in date, as determined by its number of employees. Employers are encouraged to seek guidance from employment lawyers to ensure full compliance with the Ordinance.

Firm Highlights

Publication

Important Changes and the Impact of California Industry-Specific Minimum Wage Laws

In the ever-evolving landscape of California labor laws, the minimum wage has once again taken center stage. With the recent state-wide increase to $16 per hour, the Golden State continues to lead the nation...

Read More
Publication

Employment Law Symposium Recordings & Articles

Employers Face Significant New Requirements for Severance Agreements and Non-Competes  (Recording) Conducting Effective, Defensible Investigations (With Lessons Learned from Summary Judgment & Trial)  (Recording) California Employment Law Updates: What to Look Out for in...

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Earns 2024 Best Law Firms® Rankings

Read More
Publication

Navigating California's Evolving Legal Landscape Governing Leaves of Absence

California’s employment laws are no stranger to change, and recent years have witnessed the introduction or modification of various protected leaves by employees. In this article, we will delve into three significant leave categories...

Read More
Publication

Employment Law Update for Nonprofits With Holly Sutton

Welcome to  EO Radio Show - Your Nonprofit Legal Resource . Charities, foundations, and their founders often request help addressing employment practices and compliance questions. In this episode, host Cynthia Rowland is joined by Holly...

Read More
Publication

Navigating California's Workplace Violence Prevention Law

California has introduced a new requirement compelling most employers to implement a workplace violence prevention policy by July 1, 2024. The implications of this law are significant, prompting the need for human resource executives...

Read More
Publication

Navigating California's New Rebuttable Presumption Law

The ever-evolving landscape of employment laws in California has introduced a notable change with the implementation of a new law that establishes a rebuttable presumption of retaliation in some circumstances. This law, which took...

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Welcomes Benjamin Buchwalter to Growing Employment Group

Read More
Publication

Trial Courts’ Tool Box Doesn’t Include PAGA Manageability Authority

In Estrada v. Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc. , the California Supreme Court jump-started 2024 with a boon to employees, ending trial courts’ inherent authority to dismiss unmanageable claims under the Private Attorneys’ General Act...

Read More
Publication

Navigating Cannabis in the Workplace: A Guide for California Corporations

The landscape surrounding cannabis in the workplace is rapidly evolving, posing challenges for California corporations and businesses to establish effective policies and procedures. As the use of cannabis, both medical and recreational, becomes more...

Read More