Farella Braun + Martel LLP

Farella Braun + Martel LLP

A Different Perspective

  • About Us
    • OVERVIEW
    • DIVERSITY STATEMENT
    • PRO BONO
    • GREEN BUSINESS
    • TECHNOLOGY STATEMENT
    • AWARDS
  • CUSTOM CONTENT
  • Attorneys
    • SEARCH
    • PRESS RELEASES
    • SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
  • Practices
    • OVERVIEW
    • Antitrust
    • Appellate Litigation
    • Business Litigation
    • Business Transactions
    • Construction
    • Employment
    • Environmental Law
    • Family Wealth
    • Hospitality
    • Insurance Coverage
    • Intellectual Property and Technology
    • Private Clients
    • Product Law
    • Real Estate
    • Renewable Energy And Clean Technologies
    • Restructuring & Insolvency
    • Securities
    • Tax
    • White Collar Crime and Internal Corporate Investigations
    • Wine Industry
  • Media
    • OVERVIEW
    • PRESS RELEASES
    • SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
    • MEDIA COVERAGE
    • PUBLICATIONS
    • WEBINARS
    • POLICY HOLDER PERSPECTIVE
  • Opportunities
    • OVERVIEW
    • LAW STUDENTS
    • LATERAL ATTORNEYS
    • PROFESSIONAL STAFF
  • Contact
    • CONTACT US
    • SIGN UP FOR LAW UPDATES
    • CLIENT EXTRANET
  • Home > Media > Publications > Publication Details

Media

  • Overview
  • Press Releases
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Media Coverage
  • Publications
  • Webinars
  • Policy Holder Perspective

Print this page

 

Click Here to Sign Up for Law Updates From FBM

Attorneys

  • Morgan Jackson

Practices & Industries

  • Insurance Coverage

Insurer Must Notify an Insured of Contractual Limitations Period Even if Represented by Counsel: Lessons Learned Regarding Rescission Claims

February 23, 2010

In Superior Dispatch, Inc. v. Ins. Corp. of N.Y., 2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 58, the California Court of Appeals recently established that section 2695.4(a) of the California Code of Regulations, title 10, requires an insurer to notify its insured claimant of contractual limitations provisions that may apply to a claim.  And, this remains true even where the insured claimant is represented on the claim by counsel, notwithstanding section 2695.7(f).  The decision also provides a cautionary tale for insureds as it held that Superior Dispatch's policy was void based on a misrepresentation in the policy application.

Read the Article
  • © 2010 Farella Braun + Martel LLP
  • Employee Access/
  • Privacy Policy/
  • Terms of Use/
  • Site Map
  • Client Extranet