Farella Braun + Martel LLP

Farella Braun + Martel LLP

A Different Perspective

  • About Us
    • OVERVIEW
    • DIVERSITY STATEMENT
    • PRO-BONO
    • GREEN BUSINESS
    • TECHNOLOGY STATEMENT
    • PRESS KIT
    • AWARDS
  • CUSTOM CONTENT
  • Attorneys
    • SEARCH
    • PRESS RELEASES
    • SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
  • Practices
    • OVERVIEW
    • Antitrust
    • Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights
    • Beverage Alcohol Industry
    • Business Litigation
    • Business Transactions
    • Construction
    • Employment
    • Environmental Law
    • Family Wealth
    • Hospitality
    • Insurance Coverage
    • Intellectual Property and Technology
    • Private Clients
    • Product Law
    • Real Estate
    • Securities
    • Tax
    • White Collar Crime
    • Wine
  • Media
    • OVERVIEW
    • PRESS RELEASES
    • SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
    • MEDIA COVERAGE
    • PUBLICATIONS
    • WEBINARS
    • IP BLAWG
  • Opportunities
    • OVERVIEW
    • LAW STUDENTS
    • LATERAL ATTORNEYS
    • PROFESSIONAL STAFF
  • Contact
    • CONTACT US
    • SIGN UP FOR LAW UPDATES
    • CLIENT EXTRANET
  • Home > Media > Publications > Publication Details

Media

  • Overview
  • Press Releases
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Media Coverage
  • Publications
  • Webinars
  • IP Blog

Print this page

 

Click Here to Sign Up for Law Updates From FBM

Attorneys

  • Thomas B. Mayhew

Practices & Industries

  • Business Litigation

Choosing Federal or State Court in Consumer Class Actions

January 04, 2008

Northern California ABTL REPORT
Summer 2007
by Thomas Mayhew

A key decision to be made early in many business cases, whether by the plaintiff on where to file or by the defendant on whether to remove, is whether to have the case heard in state or federal court. The onetwo punch of Proposition 64 - requiring class certification for cases under California Business & Professions Code sections 17200 and 17500 et seq. - and the Class Action Fairness Act ("CAFA") - authorizing federal court jurisdiction based on minimal diversity in any case with $5 million in dispute and a defendant corporation outside California - means that more business litigators than ever before need to address this decision. This article describes some of the strategic considerations that go into making that choice.

Document: Federal or State Court in Consumer Class Actions - PDF

  • © 2008 Farella Braun + Martel LLP
  • Employee Access/
  • Privacy Policy/
  • Terms of Use/
  • Site Map
  • Client Extranet