Insights
Publications

EPA Releases Proposed Mandatory Reporting Requirement for Greenhouse Gas Emissions

3/12/2009 Articles

On Tuesday, March 10, 2009 the U.S. EPA released a long-awaited proposed rule mandating reporting of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions from a wide range of emission sources. Congress had directed EPA to create a GHG reporting rule in late 2007, but the Bush Administration delayed development and EPA missed the statutory deadline for publishing the rule.  Under new EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson, EPA has moved quickly to release a proposed rule.  The rule would cover approximately 13,000 facilities that are responsible for up to 90 percent of the nation's GHG emissions. Comments on the proposed rule are due in 60 days. 

The rule will apply generally to facilities that emit 25,000 or more metric tons per year of CO2 equivalent GHG emissions and will also apply to fossil fuel and industrial chemical suppliers as well as manufacturers of motor vehicles and engines regardless of their total emissions.  The reporting will be required at the facility level except certain suppliers and vehicle and engine manufacturers will be required to report at the corporate level. GHGs requiring reporting include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorochemicals (PFCs), and other fluorinated gases (e.g., nitrogen trifluoride and hydrofluorinated ethers (HFEs)). 

The first annual emissions report would be due on March 31, 2011, for emissions that occurred during 2010.  It should be noted that this rule does not require third-party certification of the emissions reports which could raise questions during the comment period as to whether these reports will provide an appropriate level of certainty and accountability.  EPA has not yet determined the format in which the electronic emissions reports must be submitted, but it says it is seeking to "adapt existing facility reporting programs to accept GHG emissions data" to the extent practicable.  The reports will be required to contain emissions data on the identified GHGs and particular content and quantification requirements are identified in the rule for each type of source.  Thanks to the frontier efforts of California and other states, and the work of voluntary programs such as the Carbon Disclosure Project, emissions reporting similar to this is likely already being conducted at many of the companies to be effected by this rule. 

While this would be the first nation-wide mandatory reporting requirement, EPA says the rule has been designed to be in line with the various state rules requiring reporting, including California's AB 32 reporting requirements.  In preparing this rule EPA indicated it reviewed the various different voluntary and mandatory GHG reporting regimes that are in place internationally, nationally and at the state level.  When compared to California's reporting rule that was finalized in December of 2008, pursuant to the California Air Resources Board authority under AB 32, the EPA rule appears to follow a similar model, with some notable differences.  Besides not requiring third-party certification, another significant difference from California's rule is that the EPA rule contains a requirement that vehicle and engine manufacturers report their emissions.  The EPA rule uses the same basic numeric threshold of 25,000 metric tons per year of CO2 equivalent emissions, but the EPA rule appears to also specify a number of additional sources not encompassed in the California rule such as ammonia and electronics manufacturing. 

As a proposed rule there is an opportunity to comment on the development of the rule and to suggest areas for improvement.  Comments must be received on or before 60-days after the rule is published in the federal register.  For more information on how to submit comments, on the public hearings, or to see a copy of the proposed rule and the supporting materials visit EPA's website.

Related Articles:

CARB Releases Instructional Guidance for Operators Required to Report Greenhouse Gas Emissions Under AB 32 -December 04, 2008

OPR Releases Draft Amendments to CEQA Guidelines to Incorporate Consideration of Greenhouse Gas Emissions- January 21, 2009

Farella Braun + Martel advises clients on carbon management strategies, reporting obligations and the treatment of GHG emissions in CEQA documents and is closely monitoring the development of climate change-related statutes and regulations. For more information, please contact Buzz Hines at 415.954.4400.

Firm Highlights

Publication

Nonprofit Quick Tip: State Filings in North Carolina and South Carolina

Welcome to  EO Radio Show - Your Nonprofit Legal Resource . Episode 75 is the tenth in a series of Quick Tip episodes focusing on the details of state registration of nonprofit corporations. With...

Read More
News

North Coast Industry Insiders Weigh In on Why California Cannabis Tax Revenue Slipped in 2023

Jeff Hamilton spoke to Susan Wood with the North Bay Business Journal for the article "North Coast Industry Insiders Weigh In on Why California Cannabis Tax Revenue Slipped in 2023." Read the article with Jeff's...

Read More
Publication

Employment Law Update for Nonprofits With Holly Sutton

Welcome to  EO Radio Show - Your Nonprofit Legal Resource . Charities, foundations, and their founders often request help addressing employment practices and compliance questions. In this episode, host Cynthia Rowland is joined by Holly...

Read More
News

JPMorgan Chase Accuses TransUnion of Stealing 'Trade Secrets'

Intellectual property practice chair Eugene Mar provided expert commentary to American Banker for the article "JPMorgan Chase Accuses TransUnion of Stealing 'Trade Secrets'." In the article, he said: "By filing this as a trade...

Read More
Publication

Insurance Market Crushes Wineries and Wine Country Homeowners

We keep hearing about how difficult it is for winery and vineyard owners to get property insurance these days, both for their homes and their wine businesses in California’s wildfire-prone areas. Those who have...

Read More
News

Scraping Battles: Meta Loses Legal Effort to Halt Harvesting of Personal Profiles

Alex Reese spoke to Matt Fleischer-Black of  Cybersecurity Law Report about the Meta v. Bright Data decision and its impact on U.S. scraping case law. Read the article here (paywall or trial).

Read More
Publication

Corporate Transparency Act: A Guide on Beneficial Ownership for Nonprofit Executives

The Corporate Transparency Act, enacted as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, represents a significant shift in regulatory requirements for entities across the United States. This act, set to...

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Earns San Francisco Green Business Recertification

Read More
Publication

Corporate Transparency Act: State of the Law and Beneficial Ownership Reporting Requirements

Key Points: Despite ongoing legal challenges, the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) generally remains in effect and enforceable. Clients should continue to abide by its regulations. Initial reports for entities formed in 2024 are due within...

Read More
News

Farella Announces 2024 Leadership Council on Legal Diversity Pathfinders: Taylor Rottjakob and John Ugai

Farella Braun + Martel is proud to announce that senior associates  Taylor E. Rottjakob and John M. Ugai have been named 2024 Leadership Council on Legal Diversity (LCLD) Pathfinders. Pathfinders have been identified as...

Read More