Insights
Events

Understanding the Insurer's Duty to Settle

9/19/2018 12:00pm
San Francisco, CA

Erica Villanueva to moderate the panel "Understanding the Insurer's Duty to Settle" at a Bar Association of San Francisco CLE event presented by the Insurance and Litigation Sections.

Defense counsel often assume that an insurer has a “duty” to fund any settlement opportunity their client wants to accept. The legal requirements for triggering an insurer’s duty to settle are far more nuanced. We will discuss the elements that must be met under
California law, the options available to an insurer in a “duty to settle” situation, and how both the policyholder and the insurer can preserve their rights.

Topics

  • The factual and legal requirements to trigger the insurer’s “duty to settle”
  • How defense counsel’s conduct affects a duty to settle
  • How insurers can document their file in order to demonstrate they are complying with their obligations
  • The insurer’s ability to fund settlement under a reservation of rights, and the implications for policyholders and insurers
  • How insurance may or may not respond

Event registration link.

Firm Highlights

Publication

The 10th Circuit Correctly Construes “That Particular Part” Narrowly

We do not often write about coverage opinions from jurisdictions as far away as Oklahoma; however, a recent case from the Federal Tenth Circuit looked at one of our favorite topics and came out...

Read More
News

Farella Adds Technology Industry Group Depth

Read More
Publication

3 Lessons For Calif. Insureds From Late-Notice Rule Decision

In Pitzer College v. Indian Harbor Insurance Company ,[1] the California Supreme Court resolved two previously open questions in insurance law: (1) it concluded that the notice-prejudice rule[2] is a fundamental public policy of...

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Attorneys Recognized in The Best Lawyers in America© 2020

Read More
Publication

“That Particular Part” – Yet More

Massachusetts Appeals Court Gets It Right – Mostly Hot on the heels of the Federal Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision in MTI, Inc. v. Employers Insurance Company of Wausau , __ F.3d __...

Read More
Event

EPLI Policies in Employment Litigation

Shanti Eagle is the moderator for this BASF Labor and Employment Section program, "EPLI Policies in Employment Litigation." This program will provide an overview of using Employment Practices Liability Insurance (EPLI) policies in employment...

Read More
Publication

Damages for Permit Revocation Constitute Covered “Loss of Use”

Insurers often claim “economic damages” are not covered under a standard commercial general liability (CGL) policy.  The Fourth District Court of Appeal’s decision in Thee Sombrero, Inc. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., 28 Cal. App...

Read More
Publication

Insurance for the Cannabis Industry Program Takeaways

I recently moderated a Bar Association of San Francisco Insurance Section program co-sponsored with the Cannabis Law Section. The program highlighted recent changes to local insurance requirements and market availability of coverage for cannabis...

Read More
Publication

Reimbursement of Employment-Related Expenses Is Not a “Wage and Hour” Claim Within the Meaning of EPLI Exclusion

A recent California appellate court decision found that a wage and hour exclusion in an Employment Practices Liability Insurance (“EPLI”) policy did not bar coverage for claims under California Labor Code sections 2800 and...

Read More
Publication

California Supreme Court Ruling Clarifies That the Notice-Prejudice Rule Is a Fundamental Public Policy That May Override Choice of Law Provisions

In  Pitzer College v. Indian Harbor Insurance Company , the California Supreme Court resolved two previously open questions in insurance law: (1) it concluded that the notice-prejudice rule [1]  is a fundamental public policy...

Read More