Insights
Firm News

Court Ruling Requires Greater Protection Against OHV Abuse In California Desert

January 31, 2011 Announcement

In follow-up to a ruling on off-highway vehicle routes in the California desert, federal judge imposes deadline for new plan and imposes protective measures

SAN FRANCISCO - January 31, 2011:  Ten environmental organizations secured a favorable ruling in a federal lawsuit against the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM), which manages 25 million acres of public land in southern California known as the California Desert Conservation Area (CDCA). 

The January 29, 2011 remedies ruling from the Hon. Susan Illston of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California is the follow-up to a 2009 decision in which Judge Illston held that BLM did not adhere to its own regulations and violated the National Environmental Policy Act and Federal Land Policy and Management Act in its 2006 Plan allowing off-highway vehicle (OHV) use on thousands of miles of trails within West Mojave planning area.  The court's remedies ruling addresses the status of OHV routes during the pendency of BLM's remand to comply with the court's 2009 decision, and implements measures to protect the desert during that time period.

The January ruling ordered several key protective measures, including: 

  • BLM must complete a new designation of OHV routes by the end of March, 2014
  • BLM must place signs on all the OHV routes where use is legal, and inform visitors which routes are legal for use
  • BLM must create a monitoring plan that will determine whether illegal OHV use is occurring
  • BLM must provide additional enforcement capacity to prevent illegal use

The judge declined to implement several protective measures the plaintiffs had requested, including closing some specific areas with lengthy histories of illegal OHV use.   

Plaintiffs' counsel David Lazerwitz and Matt Bostick of Farella Braun + Martel in San Francisco, Sky Stanfield of Keyes & Fox in Oakland and Robert Wiygul of Waltzer & Wiygul in Ocean Springs, Miss., together represented six of the ten plaintiff environmental organizations. 

Sky Stanfield of Keyes & Fox said, "We are pleased that the judge has ordered these important protections for the CDCA and all the creatures that depend on it.  These measures will force the agency to better manage the rampant illegal use plaguing the Western Mojave."

Robert Wiygul of Waltzer & Wiygul noted, "We are certainly disappointed that some of the broader protections we requested were not granted, but overall the new measures the judge ordered will provide a foundation for curbing destructive OHV use.   The real test will come when its time for BLM to actually implement these measures.  If the agency wants to get a handle on OHV use, it will cooperate.  If it doesn't, it will fight any new requirements."       

David Lazerwitz of Farella Braun + Martel explained, "We are particularly glad to see the court impose specific protective measures during the remand period, which will likely take several years and involve significant public input.  The plaintiff organizations filed this case in 2006 and, despite the favorable ruling on summary judgment in 2009, have waited many years to see on-the-ground action to address OHV impacts.  This ruling finally gets us heading in the right direction."

Farella Braun + Martel LLP, Keyes & Fox LLP and Waltzer & Wiygul represent the following plaintiffs: Alliance for Responsible Recreation, The Wilderness Society, Friends of Juniper Flats, Western San Bernardino Landowners Association, California Native Plant Society and Community ORV Watch. The Center for Biological Diversity and the Stanford Law School Environmental Law Clinic represent four additional plaintiffs: The Center for Biological Diversity, the Sierra Club, Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility and Desert Survivors.

Contacts:   

David Lazerwitz and Matt Bostick
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
(415) 954-4400
[email protected]
[email protected]

Sky Stanfield
Keyes & Fox LLP
(510) 314-8204 / [email protected]           

Robert Wiygul
Waltzer & Wiygul
(228) 872-1125 / [email protected]

Firm Highlights

Event

LSI's PFAS Contamination and Regulation in California Virtual Conference

Sarah Bell will be speaking at LSI's virtual conference on PFAS Contamination and Regulation in California live webinar, "PFAS and Hazardous Materials Cleanup Laws." Details: CWA violations, CERCLA designations, and NRD claims as potential game...

Read More
Publication

Key PFAS Regulatory Standards Set in California

In support of California’s efforts to investigate and evaluate the presence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the environment, the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board) has released interim...

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Attorneys, Practices Recognized by Chambers USA 2020

SAN FRANCISCO, April 23, 2020: Farella Braun + Martel announces that Chambers USA has recognized 12 lawyers and five practice areas in the legal directory’s 2020 edition. Individual Rankings: Tyler Gerking – Insurance: Policyholders...

Read More
News

SCOTUS Clean Water Act Test ‘Devastating’ for Industry

Sarah Bell commented on the U.S. Supreme Court ruling saying that the Clean Water Act can be used to regulate pollution that travels through groundwater. Read full article, here . The case is  County...

Read More
Publication

The Winding Trail Home: Marin County Secures Key Multi-Use Trail Access Decision

With Marin County’s Mt. Tamalpais often considered the birthplace of mountain biking, it should not be surprising that the County finds itself at the forefront of California’s battle over multi-use trail access and consequently...

Read More
News

EPA Narrows States’ Veto Power Over Infrastructure Projects

Environmental Law Partner Sarah Bell spoke to Bloomberg Law about EPA rule (RIN: 2040-AF86 ), which aims to discourage coastal states from relying on part of the Clean Water Act to block fossil fuel...

Read More
Event

Reexamining Indirect Discharges and the Clean Water Act After County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund

Sarah Bell will be speaking on this Strafford live webinar, "Reexamining Indirect Discharges and the Clean Water Act After County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund ." This CLE webinar will discuss the...

Read More
Publication

New Screening Levels for Key PFAS Chemicals Will Spur Regulatory Action at Contaminated Sites

In support of the State Water Resources Control Board’s (State Board) efforts to investigate and evaluate the public health effects of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board...

Read More
News

Lawyers See Maui Opinion as Grounds to Challenge Trump Water Rule

Environmental law partner Sarah Bell was quoted in the Bloomberg Law article, "Lawyers See Maui Opinion as Grounds to Challenge Trump Water Rule." In the article, Sarah said the Maui holding will be used...

Read More
Publication

New EPA Clean Water Act Rule Attempts to Streamline Permitting Process

Earlier this week, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency finalized the “Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification Rule” (Rule). The Rule comes with significant procedural and substantive changes to the certification process for infrastructure projects. Under...

Read More