Insights
Firm News

Farella Braun Files Amicus Brief in Support of Humanitarian Organizations in Ninth Circuit Appeal of WhatsApp v. NSO

December 23, 2020 Announcement

SAN FRANCISCO, December 23, 2020: Northern California legal powerhouse Farella Braun + Martel today submitted an amicus brief in support of civil society organizations in the NSO Group v. WhatsApp appeal pending before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, encouraging the court to consider the humanitarian harms of NSO Group’s alleged cyberattack in 2019 on WhatsApp servers. The organizations supported by the firm’s amicus brief are Access Now, Amnesty International, Committee to Protect Journalists, Internet Freedom Foundation, Paradigm Initiative, Privacy International, Red en Defensa de los Derechos Digitales and Reporters Without Borders.

In WhatsApp v. NSO Group, WhatsApp sued NSO Group, an Israeli spyware company, alleging numerous causes of action, including violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, following a May 2019 incident during which NSO and its governmental clients allegedly infiltrated WhatsApp’s servers, seeking to infect users’ phones with the virus. Once it infects a phone, Pegasus can obtain messages, emails, contact lists, photos and videos, and even turn on the phone’s camera, microphone, and GPS system. NSO moved to dismiss WhatsApp’s lawsuit, claiming it is entitled to derivative foreign sovereign immunity, but the district court rejected this argument. NSO appealed to the Ninth Circuit, where it is currently pending.

In its amicus brief, Farella Partners Stephanie Skaff and Deepak Gupta and Associate Kyle McLorg argue that NSO’s actions have harmful implications on humanitarian organizations. The brief features stories of civil society actors across the globe who have been targeted by NSO’s Pegasus spyware. Additionally, the brief explains the customary international law principles that apply to both NSO and its government clients and the ways that NSO violates these laws by deploying Pegasus on human rights activists. Finally, the brief highlights the importance of holding NSO accountable in American courts, given the insurmountable obstacles that surveillance victims often face when seeking justice for the harms they suffer in their own countries.

“NSO and its Pegasus spyware unfairly target individuals fighting for human rights around the world. Our brief brings these stories to the public’s light and to the attention of the Ninth Circuit panel,” said Skaff. “This is an issue of tremendous importance, and we are hopeful the panel will reject NSO’s claims.”

The amicus brief can be viewed here: https://www.accessnow.org/cms/assets/uploads/2020/12/2020-12-22-AccessNow-Amicus-Brief13845453.1.pdf

Farella Braun + Martel is a leading Northern California law firm representing corporate and private clients in sophisticated business transactions and complex commercial, civil and criminal litigation. Clients seek our imaginative legal solutions and the dynamism and intellectual creativity of our lawyers. We are headquartered in San Francisco and maintain offices in the Napa Valley that are focused on the wine industry.

Contact:
Cheryl Loof
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
415.954.4433 / [email protected]

Firm Highlights

Publication

Breaking up the Patent Monopoly for the Benefit of Batteries

The patent monopoly is at odds with the global need for battery storage technology. As the world mobilizes towards climate change solutions, companies with battery patents will face increasing pressure to share this critical...

Read More
News

3 Things To Know After Busy WDTX Patent Judge's 1st Trial

Eugene Mar spoke to Law360 about the  MV3 Partners LLC v. Roku Inc.  case in the article, " 3 Things To Know After Busy WDTX Patent Judge's 1st Trial." In the article, Eugene said he's...

Read More
Publication

Insights Into the First Patent Trial in Waco, Texas - MV3 Partners v. Roku

A 7-person jury in Waco, Texas, recently returned its verdict in the first patent trial held before Judge Albright: defense verdict, no finding of infringement. In the MV3 Partners v. Roku dispute, MV3 Partners...

Read More
Publication

Three Steps Licensees Can Take to Protect Their IP Rights in Bankruptcy

During periods of widespread economic disruption such as the present, operating businesses must be able to identify and respond to threats to the financial health of their contracting counterparts in order to protect key...

Read More
Publication

Artificial Intelligence Can’t Patent Inventions: So What?

The USPTO’s  recent landmark decision  ( 16/524,350 ) concluding artificial intelligence (AI) cannot be a named patent inventor perhaps sparked fears of super-robots inventing critical technologies that, alas, receive no patent protection. If an...

Read More
Event

Cannabis IP: Using Intellectual Property to Protect Your Assets and Grow Your Business

Join Nate Garhart and Ashley Roybal-Reid in the discussion on "Cannabis IP: Using Intellectual Property to Protect Your Assets and Grow Your Business." Intellectual property (IP) is a critical issue in the cannabis industry...

Read More
News

Benchmark Litigation 2021 Ranks Farella Among Top Litigation Firms in California

SAN FRANCISCO, October 12, 2020: Farella Braun + Martel continues to be ranked among the top litigation firms in California in the  Benchmark Litigation  2021 guide. Farella was ranked “Highly Recommended” for Dispute Resolution...

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Elevates Five to Partner

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Ranked Among “Best Law Firms” by U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers

SAN FRANCISCO, November 5, 2020: Farella Braun + Martel earned national and regional rankings across a number of practice areas in the U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers® release of the “Best...

Read More
Publication

How Antitrust and Unfair Competition Laws Affect Platform Providers’ Relationships With ISVs, API Developers, and Scrapers

A wide variety of business and consumer platforms host mutually beneficial ecosystems. But these ecosystems are also fraught with antitrust risk that arises when platforms try to terminate or modify the terms of third-party...

Read More