Insights
Firm News

Farella Braun Files Amicus Brief in Support of Humanitarian Organizations in Ninth Circuit Appeal of WhatsApp v. NSO

December 23, 2020 Announcement

SAN FRANCISCO, December 23, 2020: Northern California legal powerhouse Farella Braun + Martel today submitted an amicus brief in support of civil society organizations in the NSO Group v. WhatsApp appeal pending before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, encouraging the court to consider the humanitarian harms of NSO Group’s alleged cyberattack in 2019 on WhatsApp servers. The organizations supported by the firm’s amicus brief are Access Now, Amnesty International, Committee to Protect Journalists, Internet Freedom Foundation, Paradigm Initiative, Privacy International, Red en Defensa de los Derechos Digitales and Reporters Without Borders.

In WhatsApp v. NSO Group, WhatsApp sued NSO Group, an Israeli spyware company, alleging numerous causes of action, including violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, following a May 2019 incident during which NSO and its governmental clients allegedly infiltrated WhatsApp’s servers, seeking to infect users’ phones with the virus. Once it infects a phone, Pegasus can obtain messages, emails, contact lists, photos and videos, and even turn on the phone’s camera, microphone, and GPS system. NSO moved to dismiss WhatsApp’s lawsuit, claiming it is entitled to derivative foreign sovereign immunity, but the district court rejected this argument. NSO appealed to the Ninth Circuit, where it is currently pending.

In its amicus brief, Farella Partners Stephanie Skaff and Deepak Gupta and Associate Kyle McLorg argue that NSO’s actions have harmful implications on humanitarian organizations. The brief features stories of civil society actors across the globe who have been targeted by NSO’s Pegasus spyware. Additionally, the brief explains the customary international law principles that apply to both NSO and its government clients and the ways that NSO violates these laws by deploying Pegasus on human rights activists. Finally, the brief highlights the importance of holding NSO accountable in American courts, given the insurmountable obstacles that surveillance victims often face when seeking justice for the harms they suffer in their own countries.

“NSO and its Pegasus spyware unfairly target individuals fighting for human rights around the world. Our brief brings these stories to the public’s light and to the attention of the Ninth Circuit panel,” said Skaff. “This is an issue of tremendous importance, and we are hopeful the panel will reject NSO’s claims.”

The amicus brief can be viewed here: https://www.accessnow.org/cms/assets/uploads/2020/12/2020-12-22-AccessNow-Amicus-Brief13845453.1.pdf

Farella Braun + Martel is a leading Northern California law firm representing corporate and private clients in sophisticated business transactions and complex commercial, civil and criminal litigation. Clients seek our imaginative legal solutions and the dynamism and intellectual creativity of our lawyers. We are headquartered in San Francisco and maintain offices in the Napa Valley that are focused on the wine industry.

Contact:
Cheryl Loof
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
415.954.4433 / [email protected]

Firm Highlights

Publication

Will the Supreme Court Limit Copyright Damages? Implications of Warner Chappell Music, Inc. et al. v. Sherman Nealy et al.

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Warner Chappell Music, Inc. et al. v. Sherman Nealy et al. (Case No. 22-1078) on February 21, 2024. On the surface, the case presents the opportunity...

Read More
Publication

AI and Trade Secrets: A Complicated Friendship

Excitement has been growing for decades around the development, training, and use of generative AI, but this past year the excitement escalated into a frenzy. Everyone is considering how AI impacts their business. This article...

Read More
Publication

Hsu Untied Interview With Dan Callaway

Dan Callaway, a partner specializing in intellectual property litigation, was a guest on Hsu Untied , an award-winning podcast hosted and produced by Richard Hsu featuring entrepreneurs, venture capitalists, best-selling authors, and more.  During...

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Earns 2024 Best Law Firms® Rankings

Read More
Publication

It Wasn’t Me, It Was the AI: Intellectual Property and Data Privacy Concerns With Nonprofits’ Use of Artificial Intelligence Systems

In today's rapidly changing technological landscape, artificial intelligence (AI) is making headlines and being discussed constantly. To be sure, AI provides a powerful tool to nonprofits in creating content and exploiting for countless cost-effective...

Read More
News

Scraping Battles: Meta Loses Legal Effort to Halt Harvesting of Personal Profiles

Alex Reese spoke to Matt Fleischer-Black of  Cybersecurity Law Report about the Meta v. Bright Data decision and its impact on U.S. scraping case law. Read the article here (paywall or trial).

Read More
Publication

Is the Copyright Threat to Generative AI Overhyped? Implications of Kadrey v. Meta

In November 2023, Meta successfully had nearly all of the claims against it dismissed in the Kadrey v. Meta Platforms, Inc. suit, a victory with potential implications for other technology companies with generative AI tools...

Read More
News

Winston Liaw Named a Leadership Council on Legal Diversity Fellow

Northern California legal powerhouse Farella Braun + Martel is proud to announce that Winston Liaw has been named a Leadership Council on Legal Diversity (LCLD) Fellow for 2024. Winston joins a select group of...

Read More
Publication

Fair Use Question Goes to Trial in AI Copyright Lawsuit – Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence

On September 25, 2023, a United States Circuit Judge determined that fact questions surrounding issues of fair use and tortious interference required a jury to decide media conglomerate Thomson Reuters’s lawsuit against Ross Intelligence...

Read More
Publication

Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence: AI Copyright Law and Fair Use on Trial

On Sept. 25, 2023, Judge Stephanos Bibas (sitting by designation in the District of Delaware), determined that fact questions surrounding issues of fair use and tortious interference required a jury to decide media conglomerate...

Read More