Insights
Firm News

Farella Braun + Martel Attorneys Amanda Hairston and Andy Nguyen Recognized on 2014 Lawyers of Color Hot List

August 4, 2014 Accolades

SAN FRANCISCO, August 4, 2014 – Farella Braun + Martel LLP is proud to announce that Senior Associate Amanda Hairston and Associate Andy Nguyen have been named to the Lawyers of Color Second Annual Hot List. Both attorneys were honored at a reception on July 23. Farella Associate Janel Thamkul was named to the inaugural list in 2013.

The Hot List recognizes early- to mid-career attorneys who are excelling in the legal profession. Honorees represent six regions throughout the United States and were selected based on a two-step process. A selection committee reviewed nominations and researched legal publications to identify promising candidates with noteworthy accomplishments and a significant presence in diversity pipeline initiatives.

A member of Farella’s Insurance Coverage Group, Hairston’s practice includes assisting clients in pursuing coverage claims related to products liability, employment class actions, SEC investigations, shareholder litigation, intellectual property, technology errors and omissions and mass casualty torts. She received her J.D. from the University of California, Hastings College of the Law (2007), where she was a member of the Hastings Race and Poverty Law Journal. Hairston is co-chair of Farella’s Diversity Committee. 

Nguyen is a member of Farella’s Intellectual Property Litigation Department. His practice focuses on representing high technology clients in patent infringement cases involving video games, digital video recorders, online video, smartphones and hard drives. He received his J.D. from Northwestern University School of Law (2009), where he served as comment editor of the Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology.

Farella Braun + Martel represents clients throughout the United States and abroad in sophisticated business transactions and high-stakes commercial, civil and criminal litigation. Farella lawyers are known for their imaginative legal solutions, dynamism and intellectual creativity. With an unwavering service ethic and interdisciplinary team approach, the firm is committed to advancing clients' objectives in the most effective, coordinated and efficient manner. Founded in 1962, Farella is headquartered in San Francisco and maintains an office in the Napa Valley focused on the wine industry. www.fbm.com

Contact:
Cheryl Loof
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
415.954.4433 / [email protected]

Firm Highlights

News

Farella Braun + Martel Ranked Among “Best Law Firms” by U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers

Read More
Publication

Insurance for the Cannabis Industry Program Takeaways

I recently moderated a Bar Association of San Francisco Insurance Section program co-sponsored with the Cannabis Law Section. The program highlighted recent changes to local insurance requirements and market availability of coverage for cannabis...

Read More
Publication

3 Lessons For Calif. Insureds From Late-Notice Rule Decision

In Pitzer College v. Indian Harbor Insurance Company ,[1] the California Supreme Court resolved two previously open questions in insurance law: (1) it concluded that the notice-prejudice rule[2] is a fundamental public policy of...

Read More
Publication

INSIGHT: California Ruling in Wage-Hour Coverage Suit Offers Employers a Defense Hook

Wage-and-hour exclusions are common in EPLI policies, frequently with defense-only sub-limits that are woefully inadequate. Farella Braun + Martel LLP’s Shanti Eagle looks at a recent decision adding an avenue to establish or expand...

Read More
Publication

Reimbursement of Employment-Related Expenses Is Not a “Wage and Hour” Claim Within the Meaning of EPLI Exclusion

A recent California appellate court decision found that a wage and hour exclusion in an Employment Practices Liability Insurance (“EPLI”) policy did not bar coverage for claims under California Labor Code sections 2800 and...

Read More
Publication

California Supreme Court Ruling Clarifies That the Notice-Prejudice Rule Is a Fundamental Public Policy That May Override Choice of Law Provisions

In  Pitzer College v. Indian Harbor Insurance Company , the California Supreme Court resolved two previously open questions in insurance law: (1) it concluded that the notice-prejudice rule [1]  is a fundamental public policy...

Read More
Publication

The 10th Circuit Correctly Construes “That Particular Part” Narrowly

We do not often write about coverage opinions from jurisdictions as far away as Oklahoma; however, a recent case from the Federal Tenth Circuit looked at one of our favorite topics and came out...

Read More
Publication

Damages for Permit Revocation Constitute Covered “Loss of Use”

Insurers often claim “economic damages” are not covered under a standard commercial general liability (CGL) policy.  The Fourth District Court of Appeal’s decision in Thee Sombrero, Inc. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., 28 Cal. App...

Read More
Publication

“That Particular Part” – Yet More

Massachusetts Appeals Court Gets It Right – Mostly Hot on the heels of the Federal Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision in MTI, Inc. v. Employers Insurance Company of Wausau , __ F.3d __...

Read More
Event

WSJ Pro Cybersecurity Symposium

Tyler Gerking will be speaking at the WSJ Pro Cybersecurity Symposium session, "The Role of Cyber-Insurance." Details: How much should you buy, what does it cover and how does it fit with an overall...

Read More