Insights
Firm News

Farella Braun + Martel Complimented for Representation of Unnamed Victims of the Unabomber in Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion

January 16, 2009 Announcement

SAN FRANCISCO, January 16, 2009 - Kelly Woodruff and Farella Braun + Martel were complimented by the Ninth Circuit for our "extraordinary efforts" on behalf of victims of the Unabomber in a recently published decision.  Kelly was appointed by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals as pro bono amicus counsel for 22 of the "Unnamed Victims" of the Unabomber, Ted Kaczynski. 

Kaczynski had appealed a District Court order denying his motion for the return of his personal property, including guns, ammunition, bomb making materials, books, writings and miscellaneous personal property, and ordering that the property be sold at auction for the benefit of the four victims who had obtained restitution orders during Kaczynski's sentencing (the "Named Victims").  The Ninth Circuit had previously appointed pro bono counsel for the Named Victims, who participated in the District Court proceedings and had a voice in the plan for the disposition of the property.  On appeal, the Ninth Circuit appointed counsel for the Unnamed Victims, those victims who chose not to seek restitution from Kaczynski, to present their views as well. 

Although all the victims agreed that the Ninth Circuit should affirm the District Court's denial of Kaczynski's motion, the Unnamed Victims argued that the issue of how the property was ultimately disposed of was not a proper issue for appeal and that the District Court's approval of the plan to auction the property should be reversed and remanded to consider the opinions of the Unnamed Victims.  In particular, the Unnamed Victims did not want Kaczynski's property sold, preferring instead that it be sold or destroyed to avoid further publicity about the Unabomber.  The Ninth Circuit rejected each of Kaczynski's arguments and affirmed the District Court in all respects, including approval of the plan to sell the property.  Although the Unnamed Victims were disappointed that the plan for disposition of Kaczynski's property was affirmed without the opportunity to present their viewpoints, they were extremely pleased that the Ninth Circuit affirmed the District Court's denial of Kaczynski's motion for the return of his property.

Farella Braun + Martel represents clients throughout the United States and abroad in sophisticated business transactions and high-stakes commercial, civil and criminal litigation. Founded in 1962, the firm is headquartered in San Francisco and maintains an office in the Napa Valley focused on the wine industry. Farella Braun + Martel lawyers are known for their imaginative legal solutions, dynamism and intellectual creativity. With an unwavering service ethic and interdisciplinary team approach, the firm is committed to advancing clients' objectives in the most effective, coordinated and efficient manner. Farella Braun + Martel is a green business. www.fbm.com

Contact:

Cheryl Loof
Farella Braun + Martel
415.954.4433
[email protected]

Firm Highlights

Publication

Major Decision Affects Law of Scraping and Online Data Collection, Meta Platforms v. Bright Data

On January 23, 2024, the court in Meta Platforms Inc. v. Bright Data Ltd. , Case No. 3:23-cv-00077-EMC (N.D. Cal.), issued a summary judgment ruling with potentially wide-ranging ramifications for the law of scraping and...

Read More
News

Scraping Battles: Meta Loses Legal Effort to Halt Harvesting of Personal Profiles

Alex Reese spoke to Matt Fleischer-Black of  Cybersecurity Law Report about the Meta v. Bright Data decision and its impact on U.S. scraping case law. Read the article here (paywall or trial).

Read More
Publication

Disputes Between Shareholders May Not Be Governed by Fiduciary Duties but Could Be Covered by Insurance

(As published in Private Company Director ) Disputes regarding ownership interests often arise in the context of closely held corporations, particularly when directors, officers, or majority shareholders sell or acquire ownership interests in the...

Read More
Publication

Ensuring Your Website Complies With the ADA

In today’s digital age, having an online presence is crucial for businesses, including wineries, breweries, and other beverage companies. Accordingly, it’s essential to ensure that your beverage website meets federal standards for accessibility to avoid...

Read More
Publication

Wire Fraud Victims Have New Reporting Factors After Ciminelli

Originally published by  Bloomberg Law . Courts around the country have seen an influx of challenges to indictments and convictions since the US Supreme Court’s unanimous decision in  Ciminelli v. United States  last May...

Read More
News

The Fight Over Building New Housing in San Mateo Co., Least Compliant in Bay Area To State Mandates

Tom Mayhew spoke to ABC  News  about the lawsuit filed by Housing Action Coalition (HAC) and Farella against the City of San Mateo. The lawsuit challenges the city's recently adopted Housing Element in order to...

Read More
Publication

Reporting Dispute Claims Within Closely Held Wineries

Many wineries operate as closely held companies, meaning they’re owned by an individual or small group of shareholders, who are often members of the same family. Disputes regarding ownership interests can arise, particularly when directors...

Read More
News

Farella 2024 Partner Elevations: Cynthia Castillo and Greg LeSaint

Northern California legal powerhouse Farella Braun + Martel is pleased to announce the election of two lawyers to partnership effective Jan. 1: Cynthia Castillo and Greg LeSaint. “We are thrilled to elevate Cynthia and...

Read More
Publication

Compelling Employees to Arbitration Suddenly Has Less of an Upside

On July 17, the California Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in Adolph v. Uber Techs Inc., as to whether employees still have standing to sue for "non-individual" PAGA claims when they have been...

Read More