Insights
Firm News

Farella Braun + Martel Wins Partial Summary Judgment Motion on Fair Labor Standards Act Claims in Class Action Suit

June 11, 2010 Announcement

First reported decision addressing whether a precious metals distributor qualified for the retail sales exemption

San Francisco (June 11, 2010) - Farella Braun + Martel has won a victory for Monex Deposit Company, a seller of precious metals, in a putative class action suit brought by former employee account representatives alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).  The United States District Court of the Central District of California granted Monex's request for partial summary judgment.  This is the first reported decision addressing whether a precious metals distributor qualified for the retail sales exemption.

Farella Braun + Martel moved for partial summary judgment on the FLSA claims as to whether Monex as the seller of precious metals is a "retail or service establishment" within the meaning of the "retails sales exemption" to the FLSA under Section 7(i).  In establishing that Monex was a retail establishment, the court held that sales of precious metals by Monex were sales of goods not for resale and serving the everyday needs of the community.  The Court held that the sale was at the end of the stream of distribution and, thus, Monex was a retail establishment. 

Representing Monex were Farella Braun + Martel employment partner Doug Dexter and business litigation partner Neil A. Goteiner, as well as associates Deborah Barron, Amber Chrystal, and Megan Howard.  Also defending Monex was Thomas A. Pistone of Pistone and Wolder.

Farella Braun + Martel represents clients throughout the United States and abroad in sophisticated business transactions and high-stakes commercial, civil and criminal litigation. Founded in 1962, the firm is headquartered in San Francisco and maintains an office in the Napa Valley focused on the wine industry. Farella Braun + Martel lawyers are known for their imaginative legal solutions, dynamism and intellectual creativity. With an unwavering service ethic and interdisciplinary team approach, the firm is committed to advancing clients' objectives in the most effective, coordinated and efficient manner. Farella Braun + Martel is a green business.

Firm Highlights

Publication

One Pending Supreme Court Case Could Change the Internet as We Know It: Gonzalez v. Google and Tech Platforms’ Liability

The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Gonzalez v. Google , a high-stakes case appealed from the Ninth Circuit about the scope of protection Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act affords technology companies against...

Read More
News

Kelly Matayoshi Receives 2022 Barristers Diversity Award

Read More
News

Farella Receives American Antitrust Institute 2022 Antitrust Enforcement Award

Northern California legal powerhouse Farella Braun + Martel is proud to announce that it has received a 2022 Antitrust Enforcement Award for “Outstanding Antitrust Litigation Achievement in Private Law Practice” from the American Antitrust...

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Recognized in Benchmark Litigation 2023

Farella Braun + Martel continues to be ranked among the top litigation firms in California in the  Benchmark Litigation  2023 guide. Farella was ranked “Highly Recommended” for Dispute Resolution in California and earned a...

Read More
News

Tony Schoenberg Receives Award of Merit From Bar Association of San Francisco

Farella Braun + Martel is proud to announce that partner Tony Schoenberg has received an Award of Merit from the Bar Association of San Francisco (BASF) at the association’s Annual Membership Luncheon today. The...

Read More
Publication

Litigation Trends In the Private Equity and Venture Capital Space

In today's Upside episode, we explore fiduciary duty in the venture capital context. Can owners of a venture capital management company act in ways that explicitly disadvantage their business partners? Can they agree to...

Read More
News

Section 230's Broad Liability Shield Seen as Living on Borrowed Time

Erik Olson spoke to Communications Litigation Today for the article, "Section 230's Broad Liability Shield Seen as Living on Borrowed Time," discussing the implications of the coming SCOTUS decision in Gonzalez .  In the...

Read More
Publication

SB 54: Shifting the Burden to Producers To Address California's Plastic Pollution

California's SB 54: Plastics Pollution Prevention and Packaging Producer Responsibility Act  (Public Resources Code § 41821.5) adopts the “extended producer responsibility model” (or “circular economy framework”), which makes manufacturers of single-use plastic products and packaging responsible...

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Earns 2023 U.S. News – Best Lawyers® "Best Law Firms" Rankings

Read More
Publication

What Recent Rulings in 'hiQ v. LinkedIn' and Other Cases Say About the Legality of Data Scraping

LinkedIn obtained a permanent injunction on Dec. 6 in its six-year-old lawsuit against data scraping company hiQ Labs, which LinkedIn quickly cheered as a “final, decisive victory” that established an “important legal precedent.” While...

Read More