Insights
Firm News

Farella Guides Volterra to Unanimous Jury Win in Critical Patent Infringement Litigation

May 24, 2011 Announcement

 ***VERDICT ANNOUNCEMENT***

On May 24, 2011, after a three-week trial, a nine-person federal court jury announced a unanimous verdict in favor of patent holder Volterra Semiconductor Corporation (Volterra) upholding the validity of all remaining asserted claims of Volterra's key patents for flip chip integrated power switches for use in voltage regulators, U.S. Patent No. 6,278,264 (the ‘264 patent) and U.S. Patent No. 6,462,522 (the ‘522 patent) against the challenges by defendants Infineon Technologies AG and its subsidiaries Infineon Technologies N.A. and Primarion, Inc. (Infineon).

On May 23, the U.S. District Court issued two pre-verdict motions for judgment as a matter of law in favor of Volterra and dismissed all remaining claims of invalidity as to Volterra's ‘264 patent and several of the asserted claims of Volterra's ‘522 patent.  The defendants' remaining claims of invalidity as to Volterra's ‘522 patent were then submitted to the jury, and on May 24, after just 1.5 hours of deliberation, which Farella's counsel James Morando said might be a local record in a patent case, the jury returned a unanimous verdict - finding that all remaining asserted claims of Volterra's ‘522 patent were valid and not obvious.

"Volterra is extremely pleased first with obtaining the determinations of infringement of its patents and now with the complete rejection of each of the defendants' attacks on the validity of these important patents, culminating in the unanimous jury verdict in our favor.  We appreciated Farella Braun + Martel's skills and tenacity in the courtroom and particularly their ability to effectively present the complex technology at issue in the case to the jury," said David Oh, Volterra's general counsel.

Volterra's trial team was comprised of IP trial lawyers James Morando, Jeff Fisher and Karen Kimmey of Farella Braun + Martel LLP. 

As a result of earlier rulings by the court and stipulations by the defendants in the litigation, it has been determined that Infineon's flip chip integrated power switch products, the PX4640, PX4642, PX4650 and PX4652, infringed all of the asserted claims of Volterra's ‘264 and ‘522 patents.  With the determinations in favor of Volterra on both infringement and validity, Volterra now intends to pursue its claims for damages against the defendants.

Farella led Volterra to this complete victory, which demonstrates for the third time that Volterra's patents have been scrutinized and subsequently determined to be valid:  first, upon initial issuance by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO); second, in recent USPTO re-examination proceedings initiated by Infineon and resulting in a finding of validity; and now, by a U.S. District Court and federal jury. 

"This was an important victory for Volterra.  The company's story of success, which originates with meetings in the basement of the house of one of the founders when they were in graduate school at UC Berkeley, is quite amazing and these flip chip integrated power switch patents have been key technology for them," said James Morando.  Jeff Fisher added:  "We couldn't be happier that the court and the jury have sided with us in protecting Volterra's valuable intellectual property."

Terrence McMahon, Vera Elson and Sarah Columbia of McDermott Will & Emery LLP represented the defendants.  Infineon has already stated that it intends to appeal these adverse rulings to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Volterra Semiconductor Corporation is a leading provider of high-performance analog and mixed-signal power management semiconductors with headquarters in Fremont, California.

Farella Braun + Martel represents clients throughout the United States and abroad in sophisticated business transactions and high-stakes commercial, civil and criminal litigation. Founded in 1962, the firm is headquartered in San Francisco and maintains an office in the Napa Valley focused on the wine industry. Farella Braun + Martel lawyers are known for their imaginative legal solutions, dynamism and intellectual creativity. With an unwavering service ethic and interdisciplinary team approach, the firm is committed to advancing clients' objectives in the most effective, coordinated and efficient manner. Farella Braun + Martel is a green business.

Contacts

Melinda Hepp / Traci Stuart
Blattel Communications
415.397.4811
[email protected]
[email protected]

Jeff Fisher/James Morando
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
415.954.4912 /415.954.4457
[email protected]
[email protected]

Cheryl Loof
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
415.954.4433
[email protected]

Firm Highlights

News

Scraping Battles: Meta Loses Legal Effort to Halt Harvesting of Personal Profiles

Alex Reese spoke to Matt Fleischer-Black of  Cybersecurity Law Report about the Meta v. Bright Data decision and its impact on U.S. scraping case law. Read the article here (paywall or trial).

Read More
Publication

What Patent Bills Would Mean for Infringement Litigation

Two bills recently introduced in Congress could significantly affect the current patent litigation landscape. The bipartisan bills are titled the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act of 2023 and the Promoting and Respecting Economically Vital American...

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Earns 2024 Best Law FirmsĀ® Rankings

Read More
Publication

Takeaways From the Proposed Patent Eligibility Restoration Act of 2023

Two proposed bills recently introduced in Congress have the potential to greatly impact the current patent litigation landscape. The bills are titled the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act of 2023 and the Promoting and Respecting Economically...

Read More
News

Winston Liaw Named a Leadership Council on Legal Diversity Fellow

Northern California legal powerhouse Farella Braun + Martel is proud to announce that Winston Liaw has been named a Leadership Council on Legal Diversity (LCLD) Fellow for 2024. Winston joins a select group of...

Read More
Publication

Takeaways From the Proposed PREVAIL Act

Two proposed bills recently introduced in Congress have the potential to greatly impact the current patent litigation landscape. The bills are titled the Promoting and Respecting Economically Vital American Innovation Leadership (PREVAIL) Act and the Patent...

Read More
Publication

Copyright Law for Influencers and Brands: How Content Creators and Companies Hiring Them Can Navigate Copyright Law for a Successful Partnership

In recent years, the advent of the social media “influencer” has revolutionized advertising. Companies often partner with influencers to market their products, hoping to tap into the influencer’s devoted audience. Likewise, influencers create certain content...

Read More
Publication

Will the Supreme Court Limit Copyright Damages? Implications of Warner Chappell Music, Inc. et al. v. Sherman Nealy et al.

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Warner Chappell Music, Inc. et al. v. Sherman Nealy et al. (Case No. 22-1078) on February 21, 2024. On the surface, the case presents the opportunity...

Read More
News

JPMorgan Chase Accuses TransUnion of Stealing 'Trade Secrets'

Intellectual property practice chair Eugene Mar provided expert commentary to American Banker for the article "JPMorgan Chase Accuses TransUnion of Stealing 'Trade Secrets'." In the article, he said: "By filing this as a trade...

Read More
Publication

Hsu Untied Interview With Dan Callaway

Dan Callaway, a partner specializing in intellectual property litigation, was a guest on Hsu Untied , an award-winning podcast hosted and produced by Richard Hsu featuring entrepreneurs, venture capitalists, best-selling authors, and more.  During...

Read More