Insights
Publications

AB 491 Gives Nonprofits Flexibility During an Emergency

9/19/2013 Articles

The California Legislature recently passed AB 491, giving corporations, including nonprofits, flexibility to conduct ordinary business during an emergency such as a natural catastrophe, an enemy attack, an act of terrorism, or a state of emergency declared by the Governor. The new Bill provides certainty to nonprofits that actions taken in good faith during an emergency will be binding and will not give rise to liability.  Additionally, the Bill allows California nonprofits to adopt emergency bylaws in advance to manage the ordinary business of the nonprofit during an emergency.  This is a good time and opportunity for California nonprofits of all types (public benefit, mutual benefit, and religious corporations) to take a fresh look at their governance provisions and what might happen in an emergency, whether the default provisions of the new law are desirable or helpful, and whether any other emergency provisions are more appropriate for their circumstances.   

Actions Permitted
Even without the adoption of emergency bylaws, the Bill provides protections for a nonprofit to permit it to continue its ordinary business during an emergency.  Previously, during an emergency, a nonprofit board might be unable to act, or would risk a challenge if it acted during an emergency without the approval of the minimum number of required directors. Under AB 491, the board of directors may:

  • Relax notice requirements for a board meeting,
  • Permit officers to serve as directors to achieve a quorum,
  • Modify lines of succession, and
  • Relocate the nonprofit’s principal business office.

Importantly, AB 491 provides that actions taken by the board in good faith during an emergency are binding and may not be used to impose liability on a director, officer, employee, or agent.

However, the Bill does not allow a nonprofit to take any action that would require a vote of members, or that would thwart actions for which the required vote has already been taken. The nonprofit also cannot take any action not in its ordinary course of business, or exercise emergency powers after the emergency has ended, though, interestingly, the Bill does not specify how to determine when the emergency has ended.

Adoption of Bylaws
AB 491 authorizes a nonprofit to adopt bylaws to manage its ordinary business during an emergency, so long as they do not conflict with its Articles of Incorporation.  These bylaws can specify procedures for calling a board meeting, quorum requirements for a board meeting, and designation of additional or substitute directors.  Corporate action taken in good faith in accordance with the emergency bylaws will bind the nonprofit, and may not be used to impose liability.  Alternatively, a nonprofit may choose to adopt emergency bylaws that require it to conform to the same procedures in effect in the absence of an emergency.  In other words, some organizations may want to override the new default emergency powers.

Unanswered Questions
AB 491 raises interesting questions about how these provisions interact with existing provisions directed specifically at nonprofits.  For example:

  • Does this supersede the requirement that no more than 49% of directors may be interested persons?
  • How does this interact with IRS requirements relating to board composition for certain types of organizations?
  • Do the emergency bylaws supersede existing bylaws regarding qualifications for directors?  Should they?
  • Would actions taken under emergency bylaws be effective if an insider transaction is approved in a manner that does not meet the Treasury Regulations governing compensation of insiders?

Nonprofits should pay careful attention to these issues when drafting emergency bylaws to ensure that actions taken during an emergency will be binding.

Firm Highlights

Event

Cannabis IP: Using Intellectual Property to Protect Your Assets and Grow Your Business

Join Nate Garhart and Ashley Roybal-Reid in the discussion on "Cannabis IP: Using Intellectual Property to Protect Your Assets and Grow Your Business." Intellectual property (IP) is a critical issue in the cannabis industry...

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Elevates Five to Partner

Read More
News

17 Firms Join Crowell in Seeking Trump's Removal

Farella is among 17 law firms joining Crowell & Moring in sending a joint letter to Vice President Mike Pence to call for President Donald Trump’s immediate removal from office and to urge Pence to invoke the 25th...

Read More
Event

Equal Pay Data Reporting, an Asset for the Strategic Employer

Join Holly Sutton and co-speaker, Erin Hastings, in the discussion on "Equal Pay Data Reporting, an Asset for the Strategic Employer." California’s recently passed SB973 requires certain employers to collect and report the number...

Read More
Event

Perspectives on Virtual Proceedings: ADR & Claims Resolution in a COVID World

Erica Villanueva will be speaking at the 2021 Virtual Insurance Coverage Litigation Committee CLE Seminar on "Perspectives on Virtual Proceedings: ADR & Claims Resolution in a COVID World."

Read More
Publication

Bankruptcy Provisions in COVID Relief Legislation Impacting PPP Loans, Commercial Leases and Preference Claims

With the COVID-19 pandemic stretching on into another year, businesses continue to experience adverse effects. Bankruptcy filings, especially among retailers, were higher than average in 2020, and it is likely that more companies large...

Read More
Publication

What to Do When Commercial Leases End Up in Bankruptcy

The COVID-19 pandemic is forcing many businesses to close, leaving landlords in the lurch. The COVID-19 pandemic continues to shake up the nation’s economy. Long-standing companies such as JC Penney, J. Crew, Neiman Marcus, Modell’s...

Read More
Publication

The Pitfalls of Boilerplate Lease Agreements

Quinn Arntsen was featured in a GlobeSt Q&A on the pitfalls of boilerplate lease agreements. There are several provisions landlords should insist upon when renegotiating leases. But there are also several common pitfalls including...

Read More
News

Lawyers Warn Those Bracing for Prop. 19’s Tax Hit: Act Fast

Evan Abrams spoke to the San Francisco Business Times for the article "Lawyers Warn Those Bracing for Prop. 19’s Tax Hit: Act Fast."  In the article, Evan said, “If you really want to do anything...

Read More
Publication

Prop. 19 Passed, Here Is What You Need to Know

Proposition 19, which passed last month, has important consequences for all real property owners in California. It is important to act quickly before Proposition 19's effective date of February 16, 2021. Proposition 19 has...

Read More