Insights
Publications

AB 491 Gives Nonprofits Flexibility During an Emergency

9/19/2013 Articles

The California Legislature recently passed AB 491, giving corporations, including nonprofits, flexibility to conduct ordinary business during an emergency such as a natural catastrophe, an enemy attack, an act of terrorism, or a state of emergency declared by the Governor. The new Bill provides certainty to nonprofits that actions taken in good faith during an emergency will be binding and will not give rise to liability.  Additionally, the Bill allows California nonprofits to adopt emergency bylaws in advance to manage the ordinary business of the nonprofit during an emergency.  This is a good time and opportunity for California nonprofits of all types (public benefit, mutual benefit, and religious corporations) to take a fresh look at their governance provisions and what might happen in an emergency, whether the default provisions of the new law are desirable or helpful, and whether any other emergency provisions are more appropriate for their circumstances.   

Actions Permitted
Even without the adoption of emergency bylaws, the Bill provides protections for a nonprofit to permit it to continue its ordinary business during an emergency.  Previously, during an emergency, a nonprofit board might be unable to act, or would risk a challenge if it acted during an emergency without the approval of the minimum number of required directors. Under AB 491, the board of directors may:

  • Relax notice requirements for a board meeting,
  • Permit officers to serve as directors to achieve a quorum,
  • Modify lines of succession, and
  • Relocate the nonprofit’s principal business office.

Importantly, AB 491 provides that actions taken by the board in good faith during an emergency are binding and may not be used to impose liability on a director, officer, employee, or agent.

However, the Bill does not allow a nonprofit to take any action that would require a vote of members, or that would thwart actions for which the required vote has already been taken. The nonprofit also cannot take any action not in its ordinary course of business, or exercise emergency powers after the emergency has ended, though, interestingly, the Bill does not specify how to determine when the emergency has ended.

Adoption of Bylaws
AB 491 authorizes a nonprofit to adopt bylaws to manage its ordinary business during an emergency, so long as they do not conflict with its Articles of Incorporation.  These bylaws can specify procedures for calling a board meeting, quorum requirements for a board meeting, and designation of additional or substitute directors.  Corporate action taken in good faith in accordance with the emergency bylaws will bind the nonprofit, and may not be used to impose liability.  Alternatively, a nonprofit may choose to adopt emergency bylaws that require it to conform to the same procedures in effect in the absence of an emergency.  In other words, some organizations may want to override the new default emergency powers.

Unanswered Questions
AB 491 raises interesting questions about how these provisions interact with existing provisions directed specifically at nonprofits.  For example:

  • Does this supersede the requirement that no more than 49% of directors may be interested persons?
  • How does this interact with IRS requirements relating to board composition for certain types of organizations?
  • Do the emergency bylaws supersede existing bylaws regarding qualifications for directors?  Should they?
  • Would actions taken under emergency bylaws be effective if an insider transaction is approved in a manner that does not meet the Treasury Regulations governing compensation of insiders?

Nonprofits should pay careful attention to these issues when drafting emergency bylaws to ensure that actions taken during an emergency will be binding.

Firm Highlights

Publication

Employment Law Update for Nonprofits With Holly Sutton

Welcome to  EO Radio Show - Your Nonprofit Legal Resource . Charities, foundations, and their founders often request help addressing employment practices and compliance questions. In this episode, host Cynthia Rowland is joined by Holly...

Read More
Publication

Insurance Market Crushes Wineries and Wine Country Homeowners

We keep hearing about how difficult it is for winery and vineyard owners to get property insurance these days, both for their homes and their wine businesses in California’s wildfire-prone areas. Those who have...

Read More
Publication

Corporate Transparency Act: State of the Law and Beneficial Ownership Reporting Requirements

Key Points: Despite ongoing legal challenges, the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) generally remains in effect and enforceable. Clients should continue to abide by its regulations. Initial reports for entities formed in 2024 are due within...

Read More
News

Farella Announces 2024 Leadership Council on Legal Diversity Pathfinders: Taylor Rottjakob and John Ugai

Farella Braun + Martel is proud to announce that senior associates  Taylor E. Rottjakob and John M. Ugai have been named 2024 Leadership Council on Legal Diversity (LCLD) Pathfinders. Pathfinders have been identified as...

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Earns San Francisco Green Business Recertification

Read More
News

JPMorgan Chase Accuses TransUnion of Stealing 'Trade Secrets'

Intellectual property practice chair Eugene Mar provided expert commentary to American Banker for the article "JPMorgan Chase Accuses TransUnion of Stealing 'Trade Secrets'." In the article, he said: "By filing this as a trade...

Read More
Publication

Nonprofit Quick Tip: State Filings in North Carolina and South Carolina

Welcome to  EO Radio Show - Your Nonprofit Legal Resource . Episode 75 is the tenth in a series of Quick Tip episodes focusing on the details of state registration of nonprofit corporations. With...

Read More
News

Scraping Battles: Meta Loses Legal Effort to Halt Harvesting of Personal Profiles

Alex Reese spoke to Matt Fleischer-Black of  Cybersecurity Law Report about the Meta v. Bright Data decision and its impact on U.S. scraping case law. Read the article here (paywall or trial).

Read More
News

North Coast Industry Insiders Weigh In on Why California Cannabis Tax Revenue Slipped in 2023

Jeff Hamilton spoke to Susan Wood with the North Bay Business Journal for the article "North Coast Industry Insiders Weigh In on Why California Cannabis Tax Revenue Slipped in 2023." Read the article with Jeff's...

Read More
Publication

Corporate Transparency Act: A Guide on Beneficial Ownership for Nonprofit Executives

The Corporate Transparency Act, enacted as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, represents a significant shift in regulatory requirements for entities across the United States. This act, set to...

Read More