Insights
Publications

Alert: California Court Holds That Holiday Pay Premium Need Not Form “Regular Rate Of Pay” Under California Overtime Statute

6/5/2008 Articles

The California Court of Appeal has assured employers that enhanced hourly rates offered for holiday work will not be considered the "regular rate of pay" for purposes of calculating California statutory overtime requirements.  Thus, the California statute only requires that overtime worked on such holidays be paid at a multiple of the non-holiday "regular rate of pay."  The Court did, however, warn that such enhanced holiday rates could create a contractual promise of higher overtime rates if the employer is not careful.

In Advanced-Tech Security Servs., Inc. v. Superior Court (Roman), No. B205186 (June 3, 2008), the employer paid employees their normal wage for holidays not worked and time and one-half for holidays actually worked.  Plaintiff Ester Roman had worked beyond eight hours on two holidays, and contended that she should be paid for those overtime hours at one and one-half times the vacation premium rate, rather than the rate she received on other days.  The employer, Advanced-Tech Security Services, contended that the overtime hours were adequately compensated by the holiday rate since it was one and one-half times the rate normally paid.

Affirming summary judgment for Advanced-Tech, the Court of Appeal agreed that the holiday rate satisfied California statutory overtime requirements.  In rejecting Ms. Roman's argument that the premium rate paid on holidays became her "regular rate of pay" for overtime purposes, the Court noted that the California overtime statute expressly provides, "Nothing in this section requires an employer to combine more than one rate of overtime compensation in order to calculate the amount to be paid to an employee for any hour of overtime work."  Borrowing from federal case law interpreting the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Court ruled that extra compensation provided by a premium rate on holidays does not constitute the employee's "regular rate of pay."

The Court did, however, suggest that its conclusion might have been different if the employee had alleged that the pay breached a contractual promise of one and one-half the holiday premium rate for overtime hours worked on holidays.  Thus, employers should examine their policies and handbooks to assure that they may not be interpreted as suggesting that wage premium rates will be compounded.

Firm Highlights

News

Farella Braun + Martel Ranked Among “Best Law Firms” by U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers

Read More
Publication

California's AB5 Codifies Stricter Rules for Independent Contractors - What Employers Need to Know

On September 18, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law AB5, codifying the ABC test for distinguishing employees from independent contractors and expanding its application beyond California’s Wage Orders. While AB5 does not...

Read More
Publication

In the Weeds: Marijuana Legalization & Employment Laws

Over the last several years, attitudes towards marijuana use have rapidly changed in the United States. According to a 2018 Pew Research Survey, 62 percent of U.S. respondents said marijuana use should be legal...

Read More
Publication

California's AB5 Codifies Stricter Rules for Independent Contractors - What Wine Industry Employers Need to Know

California Governor Gavin Newsom has signed into law AB5, codifying a new test for distinguishing employees from independent contractors. While AB5 does not go into effect until January 1, 2020, it will apply retroactively...

Read More
Publication

California Employers Granted a One-Year Reprieve on New Mandatory Sexual Harassment Training Deadline

If you are scrambling to comply with the new California sexual harassment training requirements, we have some good news: with some exceptions, employers have another year to put those plans in place. Under prior law...

Read More
News

Benchmark California 2020 Ranks Farella Among Top Litigation Firms

Doug Young named among Top 20 Trial Lawyers in California SAN FRANCISCO, October 16, 2019: Farella Braun + Martel continues to be ranked among the top litigation firms by Benchmark California 2020, a guide...

Read More
Publication

California’s New Ban on Mandatory Employment Arbitration: How We Got Here and What This Means

All employers should be aware that their use of mandatory employment arbitration agreements is prohibited in California effective January 1, 2020 under recently signed Assembly Bill No. 51 (AB 51). Under current California law...

Read More
News

Kelly Matayoshi Installed as President of UC Hastings College of the Law Alumni Association Board of Governors

Read More
Publication

New California Crown Act Reminds Employers to Carefully Consider Workplace Dress and Grooming Policies

California Governor Gavin Newsom has signed into law the nation’s first bill banning discrimination based on an employee’s hairstyle. Senate Bill 188, otherwise known as the Crown Act, expanded the definition of race under...

Read More
Publication

What Employers Should Know About the California Consumer Privacy Act Taking Effect January 1, 2020

On January 1, 2020, the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), a consumer-friendly privacy law inspired by the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation, is set to take effect. The CCPA is aimed towards bolstering...

Read More