Insights
Publications

Employers May Require Exempt Employees to Use Accrued Leave for Absences Shorter Than Half a Day

7/24/2014 Articles

On July 21, 2014, a California Court of Appeal held that overtime exempt status is not undermined by requiring employees to use accrued leave for absences of less than half a day. 

In Rhea v. General Atomics, the employer required exempt employees to use accrued leave for any partial day absences, regardless of length.  Plaintiff Lori Rhea argued the practice defeated the California and federal law requirement that exempt employees receive a guaranteed salary without deductions for most partial day absences, known as the “salary basis test.” 

One prior California Court of Appeal opinion, however, had approved of employer policies allowing for the deduction of accrued leave from exempt employees for partial day absences, reasoning that reducing a leave-time bank is not the same as reducing cash salary.  Yet, some employers and commentators had assumed that authorization was limited to absences of at least half a day, and that deducting smaller increments would undermine the assumption that exempt employees’ hours are not closely tracked.

In Rhea, affirming summary judgment for General Atomics, the Court of Appeal held that the policy did not constitute a compensation reduction under the salary basis test because it did not take away or reclaim accrued paid leave.  The policy merely required that employees use the paid leave they have accrued for such absences.  The Court noted that employers are not required to provide paid leave and may set terms and conditions for the use of any paid leave time that is given.  Similarly, the Court rejected Rhea’s arguments that the policy at issue was an improper collection or withholding of wages, a secret payment of a lower wage, or a shifting of wages from one pay period to another.

Because this decision departs somewhat from earlier practices, employers would be best served to delay any changes in their PTO policies until at least August 30, 2014, the last day that the parties may appeal the decision to the California Supreme Court.  If the decision is left in place, employers will have greater flexibility in requiring the use of incremental paid leave for partial day absences.  However, there are a number of factors to consider before changing PTO plans, including the equities involved in requiring exempt employees to use paid leave for absences of a few hours, but not increasing compensation when those employees work late hours or weekends.  Likewise, even if an employee has used all available paid leave, the employee would still be entitled to take many health-related absences, and would do so without any reduction in base pay for partial day absences.  This may provide employees with an incentive to exhaust all accrued vacation or may inadvertently result in the perception that employees who have not used all their accrued time are at a disadvantage.  Thus, any cost-saving considerations must be weighed against the resulting effects on employee morale and the administrative burden of closely monitoring exempt employees’ daily work time.

Firm Highlights

Publication

Under FTC’s New Proposed Rule, Employers Will No Longer Be Able to Rely on Noncompete Agreements

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has proposed a rule that would prohibit the use of noncompete agreements in employment contracts. Noncompete agreements prevent employees and independent contractors from pursuing certain forms of employment &ndash...

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Announces 2023 New Partner Class

Read More
Publication

California Extends Presumption of COVID-19 as Workers’ Compensation Injury and Modifies Notice Requirements for Potential Exposure

In addition to AB 152 extending COVID-19 leave through December 31, 2022 , Governor Gavin Newsom has also signed into law two other COVID-related bills—AB 1751 and AB 2693—affecting employers’ policies regarding employees who...

Read More
Publication

Spotlight on Coalition of Immokalee Workers

The American Bar Association Section of Labor and Employment Law has awarded the 2022 Frances Perkins Public Service Award to the Coalition of Immokalee Workers (CIW) for its vital decades-long fight for the dignities...

Read More
Publication

How Companies Can Stop Trade Secret Disclosure in California

When an executive, founder, or employee with access to trade secrets or confidential information leaves a company to work elsewhere, employer trade secrets might be used by a competitor. Under two laws, California’s Uniform...

Read More
News

Jaya Bajaj Named to Lawyers of Color Hot List 2022

Read More
Publication

California’s New Pay Transparency Law

Welcome to EO Radio Show – Your Nonprofit Legal Resource . Every January brings a slew of new laws that take effect at the federal and state level, and it seems that there are...

Read More
Publication

Failures Are Valuable IP: Protect Your Startup’s Negative Trade Secrets

Technology companies and start-ups are familiar with protecting inventions with patents, and protecting their secret formulas, source code, and algorithms as trade secrets. But tech companies may not be aware of another powerful form of...

Read More
Publication

Employers Should Review Common Severance Agreement Terms Due to New NLRB Decision

Historically, employers have routinely included confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions in severance agreements with departing employees. Such provisions can be important for protecting sensitive personnel data or proprietary business information from disclosure. But in light...

Read More
Publication

New Laws and Compliance Updates for California Employers in 2023

California has passed several new or amended employment laws covering topics ranging from off-duty marijuana use, reproductive rights, California Family Rights Act, COVID-19, criminal law and the workplace, new avenues of enforcement against employers...

Read More