Insights
Publications

If You Give a Mouse a Cookie: Ongoing Regulatory Monitoring Increasing in Federal and State Non-Compliance Resolution

6/29/2017 Articles

Earlier this year we highlighted the growing trend of regulators asserting continuing post-investigation control over the operations of companies accused of compliance failures. At the state level, we highlighted a deal reached between the California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) and Zenefits, a privately-held health care brokerage firm, in which the DIR agreed to forgive half of a $7 million fine in exchange for continuing audits to evaluate future compliance with state regulations.

At the federal level, we’re seeing the same trend. As a new report shows, in 2016 the Department of Justice entered more Deferred Prosecution (DPA) or non-prosecution agreements (NPA) than in any year since 2011 (excluding the Swiss bank common NPA of 2015). DPAs and NPAs avoid company criminal convictions, but often come with onerous and intrusive restrictions on a company’s ongoing operations. The authors of the new report state, “the vast regulatory powers that the government assumes over businesses through DPAs and NPAs have nostatutory authorization and would never be permissible remedies in a court of law,” including:

  • “Firing key employees, including chief executives;
  • Hiring new corporate officers and setting up new company departments and board committees;
  • Hiring “independent” corporate monitors who are given broad investigatory and oversight powers but report to the government;
  • Modifying compensation plans; and
  • Modifying sales and marketing practices.”

The report points out that in 2016, for the first time, a majority of DPAs and NPAs required that the company under investigation embed a “corporate monitor” in their organization. These third-party monitors, who are required to report to federal regulators but are paid for at company expense, are responsible for assessing and monitoring corporate compliance with the terms of the DPA or NPA. However, they are also tasked with reporting any misconduct they uncover, not just wrongdoing associated with the subject of the DPA or NPA. Moreover the imposition of corporate monitors is not just limited to public companies. As far back as 2011 the privately-held home nursing care company Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. entered into a DPA was forced to hire an independent monitor selected by federal law enforcement, in addition to paying $150 million in civil and criminal penalties.

Given the growing state and national trend of strings-attached prosecution agreements for both private and public companies accused of wrongdoing, ongoing government oversight and monitoring may be becoming an inevitable fact of life.

Firm Highlights

News

Farella Braun + Martel Elevates Five to Partner

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Ranked Among “Best Law Firms” by U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers

SAN FRANCISCO, November 5, 2020: Farella Braun + Martel earned national and regional rankings across a number of practice areas in the U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers® release of the “Best...

Read More
Publication

FCC Designates Huawei as National Security Threat

In the ongoing confrontation between the U.S. government and Chinese telecom giant Huawei, the U.S. has dealt another major blow. The Federal Communications Commission issued an order on June 30, effective immediately, declaring that...

Read More
News

Farella’s Aviva Gilbert Honored With WWCDA Catherine M. O’Neil Mentoring Award

SAN FRANCISCO, November 19, 2020: Northern California legal powerhouse Farella Braun + Martel is pleased to announce that Aviva J. Gilbert will be honored by the Women's White Collar Defense Association (WWCDA) with its Catherine...

Read More
Publication

Going it Alone: How to Manage Cybercrime Response With Less Government Help

By: Jessica K. Nall, Chair, White Collar Defense and Corporate Investigations practice and Aviva J. Gilbert, Senior Associate, White Collar Defense and Corporate Investigations practice, Farella Braun + Martel [1] Several years ago when...

Read More
Publication

Jurors, Justice and Technology

Douglas Young, Farella partner and president of the American College of Trial Lawyers, spoke with podcast host Howard Miller about requirements in jury selection and technology for jury and non-jury trials. Listen to the...

Read More
News

Sarah Good Appointed to California State Bar's Ad Hoc Commission on the Discipline System

Read More
Publication

Recommended Practices for Conducting Internal Investigations

William Keane served as the chair of the American College of Trial Lawyers’ Federal Criminal Procedure Committee, which drafted the white paper “ Recommended Practices for Conducting Internal Investigations ” published by the ACTL...

Read More