Insights
Publications

New California Law Holds Employers Liable for Labor Contractor’s Wage Violations

10/7/2014 Articles

California Governor Jerry Brown recently signed into law A.B. 1897, significantly expanding the potential liability of employers who use labor contractors, subcontractors, or staffing agencies for workers.  Effective January 11, 2015, A.B. 1897 adds Section 2810.3 to the California Labor Code, proclaiming that an entity hiring a labor contractor or agency is liable for that contractor's or agency’s failure to provide workers with required wages or valid workers’ compensation coverage under Labor Code Section 3700.

What does this mean?

Organizations obtaining “workers to perform labor within its usual course of business from a labor contractor” must assume responsibility for ensuring that the workers are paid and insured in accordance with California law.  Regardless of whether the hiring entity is aware of these violations, workers may bring actions directly against the hiring entity.  Previously, the employee had to demonstrate that the hiring entity employed them jointly with the contractor in order to establish liability.

This law does not apply to hiring organizations with less than 25 workers or with five or fewer workers supplied by a labor contractor at any given time.  The definition of “labor contractor” excludes bona fide nonprofits, labor unions, apprenticeship programs, collectively bargained hiring halls, and motion picture payroll services companies.  “Worker” excludes persons exempt from overtime as executive, administrative, or professional.  The worker must notify the hiring entity of any violations at least 30 days before filing a civil action.

What should employers do?

Organizations using labor contractors or staffing agencies will need to closely monitor those relationships.

First, hiring entities should periodically audit labor contractors to ensure they are properly paying wages and have appropriate workers’ compensation coverage.  Hiring entities need to avoid becoming directly involved in the contractor or agency’s operations, however, as this will expose employers to arguments of being a joint employer for purposes of other liabilities, such as discrimination or wrongful termination actions.  Hiring entities should consult with an employment attorney for more specific guidance based on the individual employer’s operations.

Second, hiring entities should ensure that any agreements with labor contractors include covenants that the contractor will comply with all laws and indemnify the hiring entities for liability caused by their failure to comply.

Finally, depending on a company’s size, number of temporary workers, and other factors, an employer may reconsider the use of labor contractors entirely.  In some cases, the administrative burden of overseeing labor contractors may outweigh the benefits.

Firm Highlights

Publication

Employment Law Update for Nonprofits With Holly Sutton

Welcome to  EO Radio Show - Your Nonprofit Legal Resource . Charities, foundations, and their founders often request help addressing employment practices and compliance questions. In this episode, host Cynthia Rowland is joined by Holly...

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Welcomes Benjamin Buchwalter to Growing Employment Group

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Earns 2024 Best Law Firms® Rankings

Read More
Publication

Navigating California's Evolving Legal Landscape Governing Leaves of Absence

California’s employment laws are no stranger to change, and recent years have witnessed the introduction or modification of various protected leaves by employees. In this article, we will delve into three significant leave categories...

Read More
Publication

Navigating California's New Rebuttable Presumption Law

The ever-evolving landscape of employment laws in California has introduced a notable change with the implementation of a new law that establishes a rebuttable presumption of retaliation in some circumstances. This law, which took...

Read More
News

Ripple Effects of the Supreme Court’s 2023 Decision on Affirmative Action

Kelly Matayoshi was quoted in the article "Ripple Effects of the Supreme Court’s 2023 Decision on Affirmative Action" in the Bar Association of San Francisco's fall issue of  San Francisco Attorney Magazine . Read...

Read More
Publication

Employment Law Symposium Recordings & Articles

Employers Face Significant New Requirements for Severance Agreements and Non-Competes  (Recording) Conducting Effective, Defensible Investigations (With Lessons Learned from Summary Judgment & Trial)  (Recording) California Employment Law Updates: What to Look Out for in...

Read More
Publication

Navigating California's Workplace Violence Prevention Law

California has introduced a new requirement compelling most employers to implement a workplace violence prevention policy by July 1, 2024. The implications of this law are significant, prompting the need for human resource executives...

Read More
Publication

Navigating Cannabis in the Workplace: A Guide for California Corporations

The landscape surrounding cannabis in the workplace is rapidly evolving, posing challenges for California corporations and businesses to establish effective policies and procedures. As the use of cannabis, both medical and recreational, becomes more...

Read More
Publication

Important Changes and the Impact of California Industry-Specific Minimum Wage Laws

In the ever-evolving landscape of California labor laws, the minimum wage has once again taken center stage. With the recent state-wide increase to $16 per hour, the Golden State continues to lead the nation...

Read More