Insights
Publications

SB 67 Moves California’s Cannabis Appellations Program Forward

November 16, 2020 Articles

In February of 2020, the California Department of Food & Agriculture (CDFA) issued its first iteration of the Cannabis Appellations Program (CAP), which set forth proposed regulations for licensed cannabis cultivators to establish appellations of origin. As the relevant market expands, such designations are likely to allow cannabis grown in well-known regions – like Humboldt County – to command a higher price than that grown elsewhere (much like wine grown in the Napa Valley). The CAP allows licensed cannabis cultivators in California to promote their product by designating the region from which they originated – using a protected designation similar to a geography-based trademark. 

Governor Newsom recently signed California Senate Bill 67, which went into effect on September 30, 2020 and updated the CAP in three key ways. 

  • First, it expanded the definition of a geographic region to allow for more nuanced geographic designations. While the statute previously allowed the designation of a “county of origin,” the new bill allows the cultivators to designate a “county, city, or city and county of origin.” As with the prior versions of the statute, it only allows a cultivator to use a particular designation if 100 percent of the cannabis is produced within the designated region.
  • Second, it prohibits a cannabis cultivator from falsely promoting a cannabis product as having been produced in a particular region, or from using any marketing or advertising that is likely to mislead consumers about the type of cannabis it contains.
  • Finally, it expressly excludes from the appellation program those cannabis products that are grown indoors (such as in a greenhouse) or use certain practices such as the application of artificial light. 

SB 67 required that the CDFA finish developing this process by no later than January 21, 2021. After that date, groups of cultivators seeking to establish an Appellation of Origin may submit a petition to the CDFA which contains a “general description and location of the proposed geographical area” that would be subject to the appellation. The description must contain a number of specific items, including:

(1) a description and evidence of distinctive geographical features that affect regional cannabis cultivation,

(2) an identification of the proposed appellation’s standard, practice, and cultivar requirements, and

(3) a description of cannabis cultivation in the region, including its “legacy, history, and economic importance.”  

While implementation is still a few months out, cultivators interested in a regional appellation would be wise to begin planning now, along with other cultivators and stakeholders within their region, to define and prepare their petitions.

Firm Highlights

Publication

SEC Expands Definition of “Accredited Investor” – Here Are 5 Key Takeaways

The SEC recently adopted amendments to Rule 501(a) of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933 that expand the definition of “accredited investor” by adding new categories of eligibility based on professional knowledge...

Read More
Publication

Top 10 Practical Business Implications Arising From the Passage of the CPRA

California’s Proposition 24 passed as expected, and the new California Privacy Rights Act will change the privacy landscape created by the California Consumer Protection Act (CCPA), which went into effect only months ago. While...

Read More
Publication

Cannabis IP: Using Intellectual Property to Protect Your Assets and Grow Your Business

Nate Garhart and Ashley Roybal-Reid discuss "Cannabis IP: Using Intellectual Property to Protect Your Assets and Grow Your Business." Intellectual property (IP) is a critical issue in the cannabis industry. Creating and protecting cannabis products...

Read More
Publication

Alternatives to Bankruptcy in the Cannabis Sector

Recreational or medicinal cannabis is now legal in 35 states and the District of Columbia. But cannabis is still a  Schedule I controlled substance  under the federal Controlled Substances Act, which presents a host...

Read More
Publication

Cannabis and Hemp-Derived Products Subject to New Prop. 65 Warning Requirements in California

California’s regulatory framework for cannabis and hemp-derived products, including CBD, continues to evolve, most recently via updated Proposition 65 warning requirements that came into full effect Jan. 3, 2021. As of that date, anyone...

Read More
Event

New Proposition 65 Warning Requirements for Cannabis and Hemp-Derived Products

Donald Sobelman and Wendy Hernandez will discuss "New Proposition 65 Warning Requirements for Cannabis and Hemp-Derived Products." Proposition 65 requires “clear and reasonable” warnings in California for products containing chemicals on the State’s list...

Read More
Publication

Cannabis Advertisements Prohibited on California Interstates and State Cross-Border Routes

You may have recently received a notice from the Bureau of Cannabis Control, the California Department of Food and Agriculture, and/or the California Department of Public Health regarding billboard advertisements featuring cannabis products and...

Read More
News

Election Brings Questions for Cannabis SPACs

Drew Goodwin commented in The Deal article "Election Brings Questions for Cannabis SPACs."

Read More
News

Jeffrey Hamilton Named a 2021 Leadership Council on Legal Diversity Fellow

Read More
Publication

Cannabis Industry, Including CBD Products, Subject to New Proposition 65 Warning Requirements

Updated Proposition 65 warning requirements for cannabis products came into effect on January 3, 2021. As of that date, anyone offering for sale cannabis products in California—including hemp-derived CBD products—must provide an appropriate warning...

Read More