Insights
Publications

Subdivision Map Act Extension Bill (AB 333) Provides Relief from Map Deadlines

7/27/2009 Articles

Beware other changes that can affect your project

In recognition of the difficulty developers are having in obtaining construction financing for entitled projects, Gov. Schwarzenegger signed an urgency measure (AB 333) that will extend the life of tentative maps and vesting tentative maps that had not expired by July 15, 2009.

Specifically, AB 333 automatically extends by 2 years the life of vesting tentative and tentative maps in California that would otherwise have expired before January 1, 2012. This 2-year extension is in addition to any other extension such maps may be entitled to under the Subdivision Map Act (Cal. Govt. Code § 66410 et seq) or other laws. AB 333 provides much needed relief from map deadlines that could have otherwise killed projects (or required them to be re-entitlement) prior to the start of construction.

It is important to note that the legislation only affects unexpired vesting tentative and tentative maps. It does affect the validity or duration of other entitlements that may also have been obtained for the same project as the tentative map. This means that conditional use approvals, building permits and design review approvals remain subject to applicable local regulation. It is worthwhile to check with the local agencies that issued those approvals to see if, like the State of California, they may have adopted regulations that extend the deadlines for starting or completing work.  If not, it is important to start early to obtain discretionary extensions.

Be aware that AB 333 also made other changes that may have potentially negative consequences for your project. First, AB 333 amended the period that a final map is protected from the imposition of new conditions (e.g., on building permits) from 5 years to 3 years after recordation. Second, AB 333 also clarified that the now 3-year prohibition on new conditions does not prevent cities and counties from imposing new impact fees any time after a map is approved.

Given these changes to the term of entitlements, it is worthwhile to assess how your project is affected by the additional extensions provided by AB 333 as well as the increased exposure to additional conditions.

Firm Highlights

News

Farella Braun + Martel Attorneys Recognized in The Best Lawyers in America© 2020

Read More
Publication

California's Changing Approach to Housing Policy

Hardly a day goes by without news headlines reminding us that California is in the midst of a severe housing crisis. As with any crisis situation, questions abound. How did we get here? How...

Read More
Publication

How Napa County Seeks to Streamline the Winery Permit Process

Recently, local members of the wine industry in Napa County have been actively engaged with county government in discussions regarding ways to streamline the winery use permit process. Frustrated with the cost and lengthy...

Read More
Publication

California Legislators Tackle Affordable Housing with Flurry of Proposed Bills

The California legislative session is currently underway, and several bills related to housing creation are being considered through the committee hearing process. Legislators representing San Francisco and other Bay Area cities and counties have...

Read More
News

40 Farella Braun + Martel Attorneys Named to 2019 Northern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars

SAN FRANCISCO, July 8, 2019: Forty Farella Braun + Martel attorneys across practice areas were named to the Super Lawyers and Rising Stars lists of top attorneys in Northern California for 2019. Farella attorneys...

Read More
Publication

San Francisco COPA Program Rules Released

The Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development (MOHCD) released program rules for the Community to Purchase Act (COPA) on September 3, 2019. The recently enacted COPA program (codified in Chapter 41B of the...

Read More
Publication

Attorney General Finds Impact Fees on Density Bonus Projects Invalid

In response to questions from a variety of cities across the state regarding the application of “public benefit fees” to density bonus projects, the State Attorney General’s Office published an opinion on April 9...

Read More
Publication

Keeping Tabs on Energy Efficiency – New Benchmarking Requirements for San Francisco

Read More