Publications

Congressional Action May Open The Door To A New Wave Of Fraud and False Claims Act Litigation

5/18/2009 Articles

Driven by increasing pressure to halt financial fraud and prevent misuse of government stimulus money, as well as continued concern about reported government contractor and Medicare abuses, Congress is revamping the False Claims Act for use as a serious fraud-fighting weapon. 

On May 6, the "Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act" (FERA) passed the House and it is expected to be signed into law by President Obama soon. 

FERA contains provisions extending the coverage of the FCA to any false or fraudulent claim for government money or property, whether or not the claim is presented to a government official or employee, whether or not the government has title to the money, whether or not a contract exists, whether or not the claimant specifically intended to defraud the government, and -- in the case of reverse false claims -- whether or not any statement about the obligation is submitted to the government at all.  FERA also codifies the lower materiality standard ("natural tendency to influence") recently affirmed by the Supreme Court in the Brouseau case and broadens the definition of a government "claim" to include any request for money "to be spent or used on the Government's behalf or to advance a Government program or interest." 

The net effect of the pending FERA changes is a sweeping increase in the power of the government and private whistleblowers to pursue alleged fraud using the FCA. 

Other pending legislation -- particularly the "False Claims Act Clarification Act of 2009" -- also aims to increase the tools available to investigate and prosecute financial fraud.  These congressional efforts are likely to usher in a new era of increasing fraud and False Claims Act litigation by both the government and private plaintiffs. 

Given the pending changes to the FCA, it is more important than ever that companies receiving government money educate their employees regarding the Act and institute strict internal controls to safeguard against the submission of inaccurate claims or statements to the government.  Combined with regular FCA monitoring, the money and time spent on these internal efforts represent the best way to avoid the much more costly consequences of becoming a FCA target in the government's new war on fraud.

About the Author:  Stephanie Skaff is a partner in the firm's Business Litigation Group and is well-known for her experience litigating high-profile fraud and False Claims Act cases.  Ms. Skaff served as co-lead counsel in connection with a multi-million dollar false claims action involving the construction of the San Francisco International Airport and, prior to that, helped negotiate what continues to be the largest recovery to date under the California False Claims statute -- a $187.5 million settlement of a fraud and false claim action against a large national bank on behalf of a qui tam plaintiff, the State of California and numerous California cities, counties and local government agencies.  Ms. Skaff's current false claim practice focuses on advising companies on FCA compliance and defending against FCA claims brought by the government and/or private plaintiffs.  Ms. Skaff may be reached at [email protected].

Firm Highlights

Publication

Artificial Intelligence Can’t Patent Inventions: So What?

The USPTO’s  recent landmark decision  ( 16/524,350 ) concluding artificial intelligence (AI) cannot be a named patent inventor perhaps sparked fears of super-robots inventing critical technologies that, alas, receive no patent protection. If an...

Read More
News

Farella Provides Amicus Support in Case Challenging Denial of CARES Act Funds to Incarcerated Individuals and Their Families

SAN FRANCISCO, August 31, 2020: Farella Braun + Martel, along with co-counsel the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Northern California, filed an amici curiae brief in support of the plaintiffs’ motion for a...

Read More
Publication

Undergoing Bankruptcy Proceedings? Here’s How to Make Sure PII Maintains Its Value

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, some businesses are considering potential liquidation or restructuring through bankruptcy. Companies in this situation should keep privacy concerns in mind, because the handling of personal data in bankruptcy proceedings...

Read More
News

Farella Braun Files Amicus Brief in Support of Humanitarian Organizations in Ninth Circuit Appeal of WhatsApp v. NSO

SAN FRANCISCO, December 23, 2020: Northern California legal powerhouse Farella Braun + Martel today submitted an amicus brief in support of civil society organizations in the NSO Group v. WhatsApp appeal pending before the...

Read More
News

52 Farella Braun + Martel Attorneys Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2021

Read More
News

Benchmark Litigation 2021 Ranks Farella Among Top Litigation Firms in California

SAN FRANCISCO, October 12, 2020: Farella Braun + Martel continues to be ranked among the top litigation firms in California in the  Benchmark Litigation  2021 guide. Farella was ranked “Highly Recommended” for Dispute Resolution...

Read More
Publication

Privacy During Bankruptcy Proceedings: Why It Matters

During these particularly trying times resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, businesses of all sizes have been concerned about the future. As a result, considering potential liquidation or restructuring through bankruptcy is inevitably starting to...

Read More