Publications

IP and Employment Implications of the Defend Trade Secrets Act to be Discussed at May 24-25 Roundtable Programs

5/5/2016 Articles

Farella Braun + Martel’s Intellectual Property and Employment groups will host roundtable discussions in San Francisco (on May 24) and Palo Alto (on May 25) to discuss the implications of the DTSA and its likely impact on trade secret litigation, including what changes companies and their lawyers should consider to their internal policies and practices as a result of this new legislation. An invitation with specific details on these programs will be in your inbox in the coming weeks.

President Obama is expected to sign into law in the next few days the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA), which was previously overwhelmingly approved by both houses of Congress. The DTSA provides trade secret owners with a new and potentially more powerful strategic option to bring trade secret lawsuits under the new federal law, which includes several key differences from the provisions of the Uniform Trade Secret Act laws prevailing in most states (including California). The DTSA provides for the first time a civil cause of action under federal law for trade secret misappropriation, allowing trade secret plaintiffs to bring suits directly in federal court on claims for theft of trade secret information. While Forbes has hailed the DTSA as the “biggest IP development in years,” it does not preempt state trade secret misappropriation laws or the right for plaintiffs to continue to choose to bring suit in state rather than federal court.

The DTSA presents a number of important questions for companies, individual employees and attorneys to understand, including some that may take the courts years to resolve. These include:

  • The interpretation and implications of the DTSA’s ex parte seizure provisions, which is a remedy not available under current state laws;
  • The degree and manner in which federal courts will require trade secret holders to specifically identify the trade secrets they claim have been misappropriated prior to taking any discovery, as is required for example under California’s version of the Uniform Trade Secret Act;
  • Whether plaintiffs choosing to bring suits under the DTSA in federal court will find it easier or more difficult to prevail, and identification of the key factors driving the strategic decision of whether to choose to proceed under the DTSA rather than just under state trade secret law;
  • The jurisdictional questions likely to arise if there are both federal and state claims asserted over the same issues, including the extent federal courts will allow trade secret holders to assert various common law causes of action that state trade secret laws preempt but the DTSA does not;
  • The changes employers should consider to written employment policies and employment and nondisclosure agreements; and
  • Will the DTSA result in a flood of new trade secret litigation brought for illegitimate or anti-competitive reasons or result in more “trolling” trade secret lawsuits at a time when protecting innovation through patents has become more difficult.

Firm Highlights

Publication

Undergoing Bankruptcy Proceedings? Here’s How to Make Sure PII Maintains Its Value

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, some businesses are considering potential liquidation or restructuring through bankruptcy. Companies in this situation should keep privacy concerns in mind, because the handling of personal data in bankruptcy proceedings...

Read More
Publication

Artificial Intelligence Can’t Patent Inventions: So What?

The USPTO’s  recent landmark decision  ( 16/524,350 ) concluding artificial intelligence (AI) cannot be a named patent inventor perhaps sparked fears of super-robots inventing critical technologies that, alas, receive no patent protection. If an...

Read More
News

52 Farella Braun + Martel Attorneys Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2021

Read More
News

Benchmark Litigation 2021 Ranks Farella Among Top Litigation Firms in California

SAN FRANCISCO, October 12, 2020: Farella Braun + Martel continues to be ranked among the top litigation firms in California in the  Benchmark Litigation  2021 guide. Farella was ranked “Highly Recommended” for Dispute Resolution...

Read More
News

Farella Braun Files Amicus Brief in Support of Humanitarian Organizations in Ninth Circuit Appeal of WhatsApp v. NSO

SAN FRANCISCO, December 23, 2020: Northern California legal powerhouse Farella Braun + Martel today submitted an amicus brief in support of civil society organizations in the NSO Group v. WhatsApp appeal pending before the...

Read More
News

Farella Provides Amicus Support in Case Challenging Denial of CARES Act Funds to Incarcerated Individuals and Their Families

SAN FRANCISCO, August 31, 2020: Farella Braun + Martel, along with co-counsel the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Northern California, filed an amici curiae brief in support of the plaintiffs’ motion for a...

Read More
Publication

Privacy During Bankruptcy Proceedings: Why It Matters

During these particularly trying times resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, businesses of all sizes have been concerned about the future. As a result, considering potential liquidation or restructuring through bankruptcy is inevitably starting to...

Read More