Insights
Publications

AB 491 Gives Nonprofits Flexibility During an Emergency

9/19/2013 Articles

The California Legislature recently passed AB 491, giving corporations, including nonprofits, flexibility to conduct ordinary business during an emergency such as a natural catastrophe, an enemy attack, an act of terrorism, or a state of emergency declared by the Governor. The new Bill provides certainty to nonprofits that actions taken in good faith during an emergency will be binding and will not give rise to liability.  Additionally, the Bill allows California nonprofits to adopt emergency bylaws in advance to manage the ordinary business of the nonprofit during an emergency.  This is a good time and opportunity for California nonprofits of all types (public benefit, mutual benefit, and religious corporations) to take a fresh look at their governance provisions and what might happen in an emergency, whether the default provisions of the new law are desirable or helpful, and whether any other emergency provisions are more appropriate for their circumstances.   

Actions Permitted
Even without the adoption of emergency bylaws, the Bill provides protections for a nonprofit to permit it to continue its ordinary business during an emergency.  Previously, during an emergency, a nonprofit board might be unable to act, or would risk a challenge if it acted during an emergency without the approval of the minimum number of required directors. Under AB 491, the board of directors may:

  • Relax notice requirements for a board meeting,
  • Permit officers to serve as directors to achieve a quorum,
  • Modify lines of succession, and
  • Relocate the nonprofit’s principal business office.

Importantly, AB 491 provides that actions taken by the board in good faith during an emergency are binding and may not be used to impose liability on a director, officer, employee, or agent.

However, the Bill does not allow a nonprofit to take any action that would require a vote of members, or that would thwart actions for which the required vote has already been taken. The nonprofit also cannot take any action not in its ordinary course of business, or exercise emergency powers after the emergency has ended, though, interestingly, the Bill does not specify how to determine when the emergency has ended.

Adoption of Bylaws
AB 491 authorizes a nonprofit to adopt bylaws to manage its ordinary business during an emergency, so long as they do not conflict with its Articles of Incorporation.  These bylaws can specify procedures for calling a board meeting, quorum requirements for a board meeting, and designation of additional or substitute directors.  Corporate action taken in good faith in accordance with the emergency bylaws will bind the nonprofit, and may not be used to impose liability.  Alternatively, a nonprofit may choose to adopt emergency bylaws that require it to conform to the same procedures in effect in the absence of an emergency.  In other words, some organizations may want to override the new default emergency powers.

Unanswered Questions
AB 491 raises interesting questions about how these provisions interact with existing provisions directed specifically at nonprofits.  For example:

  • Does this supersede the requirement that no more than 49% of directors may be interested persons?
  • How does this interact with IRS requirements relating to board composition for certain types of organizations?
  • Do the emergency bylaws supersede existing bylaws regarding qualifications for directors?  Should they?
  • Would actions taken under emergency bylaws be effective if an insider transaction is approved in a manner that does not meet the Treasury Regulations governing compensation of insiders?

Nonprofits should pay careful attention to these issues when drafting emergency bylaws to ensure that actions taken during an emergency will be binding.

Firm Highlights

Event

Unplugged: The Renewable Energy Speaker Series - The IRA's Environmental Justice Incentive Programs

Join Farella Braun + Martel and the Environmental Law Institute for the relaunch Unplugged: The Renewable Energy Speaker Series with Farella’s John Ugai and guest speakers Miana Campbell with U.S. Department of Energy, Maria Castillo with...

Read More
Publication

New PFAS Federal Drinking Water Standards Create Major Liability and Litigation Risk

The United States Environmental Protection Agency has released a final regulation setting individual drinking water maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for five per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). These MCLs are incredibly stringent due to EPA’s stated concerns...

Read More
Publication

New PFAS Listing Under Superfund Will Lead to Major Expansion of Liability

On April 19, 2024, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) announced its final rule designating perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) as hazardous substances under Section 102(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation...

Read More
Event

AI and Privacy: What Every Company Needs to Do Today

Sushila Chanana and Benjamin Buchwalter will discuss "AI and Privacy: What Every Company Needs to Do Today' at the ACC 2024 Privacy Summit.  This session will introduce basics of AI governance, such as ownership...

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Earns San Francisco Green Business Recertification

Read More
News

Burdened by Debt, Savvy SF Office Owners Get Creative

Restructuring, insolvency, and creditors rights partner Gary Kaplan provided expert commentary in The San Francisco Standard article, "Burdened by Debt, Savvy SF Office Owners Get Creative." In the article, Gary explained that in most cases...

Read More
Publication

California Regulation of Charitable Fundraising Platforms Part 2 - Reporting Due Diligence, Recordkeeping, and Disclosure Rules

Welcome to  EO Radio Show - Your Nonprofit Legal Resource . This episode covers the provisions of California’s Charitable Fundraising Platforms law (Gov. Code, § 12599.9) relevant to all covered charitable fundraisers and fundraising...

Read More
News

EPA Designates PFOA and PFOS as Hazardous Substances

Don Sobelman provided expert commentary in the  Chemical & Engineering News article "EPA Designates PFOA and PFOS as Hazardous Substances." Excerpt from the article: Lawyers are warning anyone purchasing an industrial site where PFOA...

Read More
Publication

California’s Estrada Decision and Impact on Employers and PAGA Claims

Following Estrada v. Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc. , the California Supreme Court’s employee-friendly Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) ruling earlier this year, employers must remain more diligent than ever to prevent and mitigate costly...

Read More
News

Farella Awards 2024 Diversity Scholarships to Bay Area Law Students

Farella Braun + Martel’s Diversity, Equity, Inclusion + Belonging Committee is pleased to announce the recipients of our 2024 Diversity Scholarship grants totaling $45,000 to Bay Area first-year law students Marcus Albino, Saamia Haqiq...

Read More