Insights
Firm News

Judge Finds Grounds to Sue California Insurance Commissioner for Refusing to Investigate Industry Fraud in Recent Wildfire Claims

April 1, 2019 Announcement

Lawsuit Alleges Insurance Industry Has Illegally Used Unlicensed Out-of-State Adjusters to Cheat Victims of 2017 and 2018 Wildfires

SAN FRANCISCO, April 1, 2019: A judge is permitting a survivor of the 2017 Tubbs Fire and an advocate for wildfire victims to sue the California Department of Insurance for letting unlicensed out-of-state insurance adjusters work illegally in California and cheat thousands of recent wildfire victims.

San Francisco Superior Court Judge Ethan Schulman ruled that the suit Eisenberg v. Jones alleges facts showing that insurance companies and claims-adjusting companies lied about the employment status of several thousand unlicensed out-of-state adjusters to bypass California’s strict licensing requirements, enabling them to mislead wildfire victims and to deprive them of their full insurance payments.

“Fire survivors like me have been victimized twice—first by the fires, and then by bad insurance adjusters,” says plaintiff Jeff Sengstack, who recently broke ground on the rebuilding of his Santa Rosa home.

“We need all the help we can get from the Department of Insurance, and when it comes to cracking down on unlicensed out-of-state adjusters, we’re not getting that help,” Sengstack said.

He noted that Judge Schulman’s order was clear on insurers’ responsibility. It states: “This is an allegation that these companies are engaged in fraudulently misrepresenting the status of people who are working for them, on a large scale.”

The 2017 and 2018 California wildfires were the most destructive in state history, burning 32,000 structures and killing 120 people.

The ruling allows Sengstack and Sonoma County attorney Jon Eisenberg, both represented by the San Francisco law firm Farella Braun + Martel, to go forward with their claim that former Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones broke the law last year by refusing to hold a statutorily-required hearing on the fraudulent scheme.

“It was shocking and dismaying that former Commissioner Jones would allow this massive insurance industry deception to happen,” says Eisenberg, who lost his home in the 1991 Oakland Fire and has been providing free legal assistance to victims of the 2017 and 2018 California wildfires. “I’m hopeful that new Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara will soon put a stop to it.”

The lawsuit will now go forward against Commissioner Lara, who took office on January 7 but has not yet initiated the statutorily-required hearing on the fraudulent scheme. The lawsuit seeks a court order requiring him to do so.

“All recent and future wildfire victims will benefit from this lawsuit,” says Neil Goteiner, the Farella partner representing plaintiffs. “Someone has to look out for them.”


Contacts
Cheryl Loof
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
415.954.4433 / [email protected]

Neil Goteiner 
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
415.954.4485 / [email protected]

Jon Eisenberg
Law Office of Jon B. Eisenberg
707.395.0111/ [email protected]

Firm Highlights

News

Farella Braun + Martel Earns 2023 U.S. News – Best Lawyers® "Best Law Firms" Rankings

Read More
News

Kelly Matayoshi Receives 2022 Barristers Diversity Award

Read More
News

Farella Receives American Antitrust Institute 2022 Antitrust Enforcement Award

Northern California legal powerhouse Farella Braun + Martel is proud to announce that it has received a 2022 Antitrust Enforcement Award for “Outstanding Antitrust Litigation Achievement in Private Law Practice” from the American Antitrust...

Read More
News

Tony Schoenberg Receives Award of Merit From Bar Association of San Francisco

Farella Braun + Martel is proud to announce that partner Tony Schoenberg has received an Award of Merit from the Bar Association of San Francisco (BASF) at the association’s Annual Membership Luncheon today. The...

Read More
Publication

Litigation Trends In the Private Equity and Venture Capital Space

In today's Upside episode, we explore fiduciary duty in the venture capital context. Can owners of a venture capital management company act in ways that explicitly disadvantage their business partners? Can they agree to...

Read More
News

Section 230's Broad Liability Shield Seen as Living on Borrowed Time

Erik Olson spoke to Communications Litigation Today for the article, "Section 230's Broad Liability Shield Seen as Living on Borrowed Time," discussing the implications of the coming SCOTUS decision in Gonzalez .  In the...

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Recognized in Benchmark Litigation 2023

Farella Braun + Martel continues to be ranked among the top litigation firms in California in the  Benchmark Litigation  2023 guide. Farella was ranked “Highly Recommended” for Dispute Resolution in California and earned a...

Read More
Publication

What Recent Rulings in 'hiQ v. LinkedIn' and Other Cases Say About the Legality of Data Scraping

LinkedIn obtained a permanent injunction on Dec. 6 in its six-year-old lawsuit against data scraping company hiQ Labs, which LinkedIn quickly cheered as a “final, decisive victory” that established an “important legal precedent.” While...

Read More
Publication

SB 54: Shifting the Burden to Producers To Address California's Plastic Pollution

California's SB 54: Plastics Pollution Prevention and Packaging Producer Responsibility Act  (Public Resources Code § 41821.5) adopts the “extended producer responsibility model” (or “circular economy framework”), which makes manufacturers of single-use plastic products and packaging responsible...

Read More
Publication

One Pending Supreme Court Case Could Change the Internet as We Know It: Gonzalez v. Google and Tech Platforms’ Liability

The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Gonzalez v. Google , a high-stakes case appealed from the Ninth Circuit about the scope of protection Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act affords technology companies against...

Read More