Insights
Publications

Choosing Federal or State Court in Consumer Class Actions

1/4/2008 Articles
Federal or State Court in Consumer Class Actions - PDF

Northern California ABTL REPORT
Summer 2007
by Thomas Mayhew

A key decision to be made early in many business cases, whether by the plaintiff on where to file or by the defendant on whether to remove, is whether to have the case heard in state or federal court. The onetwo punch of Proposition 64 - requiring class certification for cases under California Business & Professions Code sections 17200 and 17500 et seq. - and the Class Action Fairness Act ("CAFA") - authorizing federal court jurisdiction based on minimal diversity in any case with $5 million in dispute and a defendant corporation outside California - means that more business litigators than ever before need to address this decision. This article describes some of the strategic considerations that go into making that choice.

Resources

Firm Highlights

News

Farella Braun + Martel Attorneys Recognized in The Best Lawyers in America© 2020

Read More
News

Carly Alameda and Eugene Mar Named to Benchmark Litigation’s 40 & Under Hotlist 2019

Farella Braun + Martel partners  Carly O. Alameda and Eugene Y. Mar have been named to Benchmark Litigation ’s “ 40 & Under Hotlist” for 2019. The list honors partners 40 or younger who...

Read More
News

40 Farella Braun + Martel Attorneys Named to 2019 Northern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars

SAN FRANCISCO, July 8, 2019: Forty Farella Braun + Martel attorneys across practice areas were named to the Super Lawyers and Rising Stars lists of top attorneys in Northern California for 2019. Farella attorneys...

Read More
Publication

3 Trends in Criminal Trade Secret Prosecution

Criminal trade secret prosecutions are on the rise nationwide and in the Northern District of California, especially cases relating to alleged theft by Chinese nationals and entities. According to a 2017 report by the...

Read More
News

A Major Victory for hiQ Labs, Ninth Circuit Upholds Its Right to Access Publicly Available LinkedIn Data

In a blockbuster ruling, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed startup hiQ Labs, Inc.’s preliminary injunction (PI) against LinkedIn granted by Judge Edward Chen of the United States District Court for the Northern...

Read More
News

Farella Adds Technology Industry Group Depth

Read More
News

Ninth Circuit Upholds Data Miner's Injunction Against LinkedIn

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit sided with data analytics company hiQ Labs, Inc. and upheld an injunction barring LinkedIn from blocking it from accessing information made publicly available by the professional networking site’s users...

Read More