Insights
Publications

Trial Pros: Farella Braun's Karen Kimmey

5/10/2016 Articles

Law360, New York (May 10, 2016, 10:28 AM ET) --

 

Karen Kimmey is a partner and trial lawyer at Farella Braun & Martel LLP in San Francisco. She handles a variety of commercial disputes, with particular emphasis on complex contract, fraud, unfair competition and negligence claims. She also has experience in class actions, intellectual property and products liability matters, defending clients in the biotechnology, software, manufacturing and entertainment industries. She is frequently called in to take over on matters from other law firms as they approach trial and require courtroom expertise.

 

Kimmey’s recent experience includes serving as national coordinating counsel in a series of products liability claims relating to residential gas delivery materials; obtaining a unanimous verdict in a three-week patent trial that upheld the validity of her client’s technology patents; obtaining full relief for a major biotechnology company in an arbitration of a technology licensing dispute, including an award of attorneys’ fees; and serving as lead counsel to a real estate investor in complex, multi-state litigation involving claims of fraud, breach of fiduciary duty and violations of RICO.

 

Q: What’s the most interesting trial you've worked on and why?

 

A: Early in my career, I was part of the trial team in a four-month long commodities fraud class action trial. Because class actions so rarely go to trial and our theories were somewhat novel, we were forging new ground daily. As a junior associate working with our most optimistic partner and our most pessimistic partner, I was never sure whether we were about to win or about to get our heads handed to us. We ultimately settled in the middle of the night before closing arguments.

 

Q: What’s the most unexpected or amusing thing you've experienced while working on a trial?

 

A: In a recent trial, I was sent down to prepare a third-party witness we expected to be helpful to us, and I anticipated putting on the stand the next day. A few minutes into the meeting, it became clear to me that the party had completely switched positions. We had to quickly figure out a strategy to prove our case without that witness while trying not to tip off the other side to what had happened.

 

Q: What does your trial prep routine consist of?

 

A: Like most lawyers, I like to feel in control and very well prepared. I generally do a mental walk-through of what I expect to happen at each stage of the trial and try to anticipate the different ways the case could go. For example, I will often have colleagues play the role of a hostile witness and encourage them to surprise me (by varying from their deposition testimony, by volunteering something I hadn’t expected, etc.), so that I can have a strategy in place. At the end of the day, however, it is impossible to anticipate everything that might happen at trial — that’s what makes trial so exciting. So, once I feel well-prepared, I make a point of finding at least a few minutes to take a walk, listen to music or do something else that clears my head and helps me relax enough to be able to respond to whatever may be thrown at me.

 

Q: If you could give just one piece of advice to a lawyer on the eve of their first trial, what would it be?

 

A: Remember that every trial has to tell a human story. Even if it is a complicated business or technical case, jurors will bring to the case their own experience of human nature. Be able to tell your story in a few simple sentences that resonate with them. Practice telling that story to others (friends, family) in simple terms and then work your trial strategy to make sure everything is consistent with that theme. And then remember to breathe, and enjoy it. There is nothing like the satisfaction you can get from fighting for your client in the courtroom.

 

Q: Name a trial attorney, outside your own firm, who has impressed you and tell us why.

 

A: I have been privileged to work with a number of wonderful trial lawyers. In particular, I have enjoyed partnering on matters with lawyers from other firms, including recently Bill Goines of Greenberg Traurig and George Riley of O’Melveny. Bill has a natural, credible style in the court, and George is razor sharp with an ability to explain a complex patent dispute in understandable terms.

 

Firm Highlights

News

Judges Are Trying to Squeeze in More Trial Dates to Clear Court Backlogs

Farella partner and trial lawyer Karen Kimmey spoke to The Recorder  for the article, "Judges Are Trying to Squeeze in More Trial Dates to Clear Court Backlogs," discussing how lawyers are changing how they prepare for trial...

Read More
Publication

Litigation Trends In the Private Equity and Venture Capital Space

In today's Upside episode, we explore fiduciary duty in the venture capital context. Can owners of a venture capital management company act in ways that explicitly disadvantage their business partners? Can they agree to...

Read More
Event

The Fine Print: A Litigator’s Perspective on Boilerplate Contract and Insurance Provisions

Join Carly Alameda and Amy Briggs in the discussion on "The Fine Print: A Litigator’s Perspective on Boilerplate Contract and Insurance Provisions" to the ACC Bay Area Chapter. Corporate counsel are often tasked with negotiating...

Read More
News

Tony Schoenberg Receives Award of Merit From Bar Association of San Francisco

Anthony P. Schoenberg headshot
Read More
Publication

What Recent Rulings in 'hiQ v. LinkedIn' and Other Cases Say About the Legality of Data Scraping

LinkedIn obtained a permanent injunction on Dec. 6 in its six-year-old lawsuit against data scraping company hiQ Labs, which LinkedIn quickly cheered as a “final, decisive victory” that established an “important legal precedent.” While...

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Partner Sarah Good Appointed to California State Bar Board of Trustees

Read More
Publication

One Pending Supreme Court Case Could Change the Internet as We Know It: Gonzalez v. Google and Tech Platforms’ Liability

The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Gonzalez v. Google , a high-stakes case appealed from the Ninth Circuit about the scope of protection Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act affords technology companies against...

Read More
Publication

SB 54: Shifting the Burden to Producers To Address California's Plastic Pollution

California's SB 54: Plastics Pollution Prevention and Packaging Producer Responsibility Act  (Public Resources Code § 41821.5) adopts the “extended producer responsibility model” (or “circular economy framework”), which makes manufacturers of single-use plastic products and packaging responsible...

Read More
News

Kelly Matayoshi Receives 2022 Barristers Diversity Award

Read More
Event

The Fine Print: A Litigator’s Perspective on Boilerplate Contract and Insurance Provisions

Join Carly Alameda and Amy Briggs for the ACC Bay Area Chapter program "The Fine Print: A Litigator’s Perspective on Boilerplate Contract and Insurance Provisions."  Corporate counsel are often tasked with negotiating, finalizing, and managing...

Read More