Publications

Judicial Council Ends Statewide Eviction and Foreclosure Moratorium; Local Orders Remain in Effect

August 18, 2020 Articles

On August 13, 2020, the Judicial Council of California (a body representing the California State Courts) voted to allow two previously enacted emergency rules, one halting evictions and the other halting foreclosures, to expire on September 1, 2020. The vote does not impact City and County moratoriums, which remain in effect in numerous jurisdictions.

The Judicial Council had previously passed the two emergency rules on April 6, 2020, in response to Governor Gavin Newsom issuing an executive order granting the Judicial Council the authority to take necessary action to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. The first rule prohibited the issuance of summons in “unlawful detainer” actions (commonly referred to as eviction proceedings) unless the case involved public health or safety concerns. The second rule pertained to judicial foreclosures, and halted all pending judicial foreclosures, paused the statute of limitations for filing foreclosure actions, and extended the deadlines lenders have for exercising rights related to such actions.

The result of the two rules was that, starting April 6, 2020, landlords were effectively unable to evict tenants who failed to pay rent or remained in their premises past the lease term, and lenders were effectively unable to foreclose on borrowers who failed to make loan payments. Some jurisdictions, such as San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Alameda County, already had eviction moratoriums, but the Judicial Council rules made the restrictions applicable statewide.

Originally, the rules were set to expire 90 days after Governor Newsom declared the COVID-19 state of emergency over, which has not yet happened. However, as the pandemic stretched on, and state agencies and local governments relaxed shelter-in-place restrictions, the Judicial Council decided that the continued implementation of the emergency rules would be an overreach by the judicial branch. More specifically, that this had become a legislative matter and should be addressed by the executive and legislative branches. In a statement, Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye, who leads the Judicial Council, said “The duty of the judicial branch is to resolve disputes under the law and not to legislate. I urge our sister branches to act expeditiously to resolve this looming crisis.” The current legislative session is scheduled to end August 31, 2020, so there is limited time for the State Legislature to take action on this matter, although multiple bills are under consideration.

As a result of the August 13, 2020 vote, starting September 2, 2020, landlords will be able to commence eviction proceedings and lenders will be able to commence judicial foreclosures if permitted under local rules. It is important to remember that, while the emergency Judicial Council rules will no longer be in effect, numerous local governments still have eviction moratoriums in place.

Firm Highlights

News

Burdened by Debt, Savvy SF Office Owners Get Creative

Restructuring, insolvency, and creditors rights partner Gary Kaplan provided expert commentary in The San Francisco Standard article, "Burdened by Debt, Savvy SF Office Owners Get Creative." In the article, Gary explained that in most cases...

Read More
News

EPA Designates PFOA and PFOS as Hazardous Substances

Don Sobelman provided expert commentary in the  Chemical & Engineering News article "EPA Designates PFOA and PFOS as Hazardous Substances." Excerpt from the article: Lawyers are warning anyone purchasing an industrial site where PFOA...

Read More
Publication

New PFAS Federal Drinking Water Standards Create Major Liability and Litigation Risk

The United States Environmental Protection Agency has released a final regulation setting individual drinking water maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for five per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). These MCLs are incredibly stringent due to EPA’s stated concerns...

Read More
Publication

California’s Estrada Decision and Impact on Employers and PAGA Claims

Following Estrada v. Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc. , the California Supreme Court’s employee-friendly Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) ruling earlier this year, employers must remain more diligent than ever to prevent and mitigate costly...

Read More
Event

AI and Privacy: What Every Company Needs to Do Today

Sushila Chanana and Benjamin Buchwalter will discuss "AI and Privacy: What Every Company Needs to Do Today' at the ACC 2024 Privacy Summit.  This session will introduce basics of AI governance, such as ownership...

Read More
Publication

California Regulation of Charitable Fundraising Platforms Part 2 - Reporting Due Diligence, Recordkeeping, and Disclosure Rules

Welcome to  EO Radio Show - Your Nonprofit Legal Resource . This episode covers the provisions of California’s Charitable Fundraising Platforms law (Gov. Code, § 12599.9) relevant to all covered charitable fundraisers and fundraising...

Read More
News

Farella Awards 2024 Diversity Scholarships to Bay Area Law Students

Farella Braun + Martel’s Diversity, Equity, Inclusion + Belonging Committee is pleased to announce the recipients of our 2024 Diversity Scholarship grants totaling $45,000 to Bay Area first-year law students Marcus Albino, Saamia Haqiq...

Read More
Event

20th Annual Western Boot Camp on Environmental Law

Linda Gilleran is teaching the Energy Law session at the Environmental Law Institute's 20th Annual Western Boot Camp on Environmental Law.

Read More
Event

Unplugged: The Renewable Energy Speaker Series - The IRA's Environmental Justice Incentive Programs

Join Farella Braun + Martel and the Environmental Law Institute for the relaunch Unplugged: The Renewable Energy Speaker Series with Farella’s John Ugai and guest speakers Miana Campbell with U.S. Department of Energy, Maria Castillo with...

Read More
Publication

New PFAS Listing Under Superfund Will Lead to Major Expansion of Liability

On April 19, 2024, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) announced its final rule designating perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) as hazardous substances under Section 102(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation...

Read More