Publications

Insurance Coverage Against Patent Infringement Suits by Non-Practicing Entities

11/26/2012 Articles

Looking for a possible new strategy to protect yourself against patent infringement lawsuits filed by non-practicing entities (NPEs)? There is an innovative new potential option to evaluate as part of your strategy to manage the threat and expense of NPE litigation.

In response to the continued rising tide of patent infringement lawsuits filed by NPEs, RPX Corporation and Aon Risk Solutions have recently announced that they will begin offering small and medium-size companies up to $2.5 million in insurance coverage against NPE lawsuits. The insurance is currently available only to U.S. based companies with $1 billion or less in annual revenue. Although RPX has long offered defensive patent licensing strategies to help companies combat NPEs, this is the first time that it has offered insurance aimed at protecting defendants from NPEs.

Numerous academics and legal market observers have noted the sharp rise in NPE lawsuits in recent years. For example, a 2012 study from Boston University School of Law found that NPE lawsuits are “growing rapidly” and that such suits imposed an estimated $29 billion in legal costs in 2011 alone.[1] The study further found that much of the burden of NPE lawsuits falls on small and medium-size companies: 82% of defendants in NPE cases are companies that generate less than $100 million in annual revenue.[2]

Not only are NPEs targeting companies of many different sizes, they are also expanding beyond traditional high-technology companies. For example, a 2012 study by PatentFreedom shows that although NPEs have historically targeted well-known technology companies more than others, NPEs are gradually shifting focus away from those top companies and broadening the range of targets they pursue.[3]

NPE lawsuits can pose a significant threat and create great uncertainty for smaller companies. A 2011 PricewaterhouseCoopers study of patent litigation shows that median damages awards in patent litigation have varied between $2 and $10 million in the past six years.

It is difficult to assess the value of this new insurance product in light of the lack of publicly available information about the terms of coverage and cost. Further information can be obtained by contacting RPX.


[1]           James Bessen and Michael J. Meurer, The Direct Costs from NPE Disputes 2 (Boston University School of Law, Working Paper No. 12-34), available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2091210.

[2]           Id.

[3]           See PatentFreedom, Exposure by Industry, available at https://www.patentfreedom.com/about-npes/industry/.

Firm Highlights

Publication

Navigating California's New Rebuttable Presumption Law

The ever-evolving landscape of employment laws in California has introduced a notable change with the implementation of a new law that establishes a rebuttable presumption of retaliation in some circumstances. This law, which took...

Read More
Publication

Important Changes and the Impact of California Industry-Specific Minimum Wage Laws

In the ever-evolving landscape of California labor laws, the minimum wage has once again taken center stage. With the recent state-wide increase to $16 per hour, the Golden State continues to lead the nation...

Read More
News

Brookfield Forecloses on 2,150-Unit Veritas Portfolio With Uncontested $464M Bid

Restructuring, insolvency, and creditors rights partner Gary Kaplan provided expert commentary in The Real Deal  article, "Brookfield forecloses on 2,150-unit Veritas portfolio with uncontested $464M bid." Read the full article  here  (subscription may be...

Read More
News

Scraping Battles: Meta Loses Legal Effort to Halt Harvesting of Personal Profiles

Alex Reese spoke to Matt Fleischer-Black of  Cybersecurity Law Report about the Meta v. Bright Data decision and its impact on U.S. scraping case law. Read the article here (paywall or trial).

Read More
Publication

Navigating California's Workplace Violence Prevention Law

California has introduced a new requirement compelling most employers to implement a workplace violence prevention policy by July 1, 2024. The implications of this law are significant, prompting the need for human resource executives...

Read More
News

Winston Liaw Named a Leadership Council on Legal Diversity Fellow

Northern California legal powerhouse Farella Braun + Martel is proud to announce that Winston Liaw has been named a Leadership Council on Legal Diversity (LCLD) Fellow for 2024. Winston joins a select group of...

Read More
Publication

Navigating California's Evolving Legal Landscape Governing Leaves of Absence

California’s employment laws are no stranger to change, and recent years have witnessed the introduction or modification of various protected leaves by employees. In this article, we will delve into three significant leave categories...

Read More
Publication

Navigating Cannabis in the Workplace: A Guide for California Corporations

The landscape surrounding cannabis in the workplace is rapidly evolving, posing challenges for California corporations and businesses to establish effective policies and procedures. As the use of cannabis, both medical and recreational, becomes more...

Read More
News

Farella 2024 Partner Elevations: Cynthia Castillo and Greg LeSaint

Northern California legal powerhouse Farella Braun + Martel is pleased to announce the election of two lawyers to partnership effective Jan. 1: Cynthia Castillo and Greg LeSaint. “We are thrilled to elevate Cynthia and...

Read More
News

Lawdragon Names 7 Farella Lawyers Among “Leaders in Environmental Law”

Northern California legal powerhouse Farella Braun + Martel is pleased to announce that seven lawyers were selected to The Lawdragon Green 500: 2024 Leaders in Environmental Law . Farella lawyers selected for inclusion: Sarah...

Read More