Experience
Roz v. Nestle Waters North America, Inc.
In addition to retail sales of bottled water, Nestle Waters, dba Arrowhead, also makes recurring monthly deliveries to home and office customers (i.e., water coolers). Plaintiffs brought a class action under a new California statutory scheme that regulates “automatic renewal contracts” – i.e., contracts where a credit card is charged on a repeated basis for continued deliveries of goods or services. Precedent in this area was limited because the statute is relatively new. In September 2017, the court denied class certification; plaintiff sought to try the case in order to preserve the right to appeal, and the case was set for trial in December 2017. After a pretrial ruling interpreted the statute to reject most of plaintiffs’ claims, the plaintiff agreed to dismiss with prejudice for a waiver of costs.
Brazil v. Dell Inc.
We defended Dell in a federal court consumer class action alleging false advertising and misrepresentations concerning product discounts and asserting claims for alleged violations of the Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200 et seq., the False Advertising Law (“FAL”), Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17500 et seq., the Consumer Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1750 et seq., intentional and negligent misrepresentation, unjust enrichment and breach of contract.
/Passle/65737bea961a63814fd9b845/SearchServiceImages/2026-06-19-03-48-26-954-6a34bc0a684e960d09d13168.jpg)
/Passle/65737bea961a63814fd9b845/SearchServiceImages/2026-06-20-23-45-25-405-6a372615e813fba7e6a66440.jpg)
/Passle/65737bea961a63814fd9b845/SearchServiceImages/2026-06-22-18-20-26-701-6a397cea8540ef4ca2addc56.jpg)
/Passle/65737bea961a63814fd9b845/MediaLibrary/Images/2025-07-21-23-30-54-976-687ecdae3c5c081e6e9e0d61.jpg)