Compelling Employees to Arbitration Suddenly Has Less of an Upside
On July 17, the California Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in Adolph v. Uber Techs Inc., as to whether employees still have standing to sue for "non-individual" PAGA claims when they have been compelled to arbitrate their individual Labor Code claims. The Court in a 7-0 vote answered yes: aggrieved employees still have standing — foreclosing employers' ability to extinguish PAGA claims by compelling underlaying Labor Code claims to individual arbitration.
Read the full article here.
/Passle/65737bea961a63814fd9b845/SearchServiceImages/2025-08-14-19-20-27-441-689e36fbdd7e65ae66d27767.jpg)
/Passle/65737bea961a63814fd9b845/SearchServiceImages/2025-06-06-20-31-48-699-68435034c52746b4fe8f99c8.jpg)
/Passle/65737bea961a63814fd9b845/SearchServiceImages/2026-05-19-15-54-13-763-6a0c87a5b535ef3db095ce50.jpg)
/Passle/65737bea961a63814fd9b845/SearchServiceImages/2026-05-28-00-46-03-279-6a17904bed2469179d548bbf.jpg)
/Passle/65737bea961a63814fd9b845/SearchServiceImages/2026-01-30-01-53-26-333-697c0f16b3240c729b280715.jpg)
/Passle/65737bea961a63814fd9b845/SearchServiceImages/2026-01-12-22-00-50-674-69656f125262d0a2d84e72d9.jpg)