Insights
Firm News

Farella Braun + Martel Represents Zep Solar in Patent Infringement Lawsuit Against Westinghouse Solar, Light Way, Others

December 22, 2011 Announcement

SAN FRANCISCO, December 22, 2011: Farella Braun + Martel LLP is Zep Solar Inc.’s counsel in a patent infringement lawsuit against Westinghouse Solar, Inc. (“Westinghouse” NASDAQ: WEST), Light Way Solar and three other parties, which was filed yesterday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Zep Solar, developers of the first PV module-integrated installation platform, maintains that the defendants infringed on a critical patent (US #7,592,537) that covers many of its innovative and highly successful products, including its coveted “Interlock” product.

Zep Solar News Release

Jeffrey Fisher, Farella’s Intellectual Property Department Chair, is one of the lead attorneys in the lawsuit and has long served as Zep Solar’s counsel in patent litigation matters. In this case, the suit alleges that Westinghouse and the other defendants wrongfully used patents that make up the Zep Compatible™ platform. Zep Solar is seeking enhanced damages for willful infringement and has prayed for injunctive relief barring Westinghouse and the other defendants from infringing Zep’s Patent through the licensing, manufacturing, importation and sale or use of Westinghouse’s PV modules and installation hardware, including the Westinghouse Solar Power Systems AC-230/235 product family, Andalay Groove components and others.

“It’s an intensely competitive solar market out there, and Zep Solar has developed revolutionary products and services that have not only secured it a leading stance in the marketplace but have challenged competitors to raise the bar,” said Fisher. “Unfortunately, Westinghouse has blatantly used Zep Solar’s intellectual property in their products to better compete, and we are determined to prove infringement of these critical patents.”

In addition to Fisher, Senior IP Litigation Partner Rod Thompson and IP Litigation Associates Deepak Gupta, Marc Tarlock and Morgan Jackson comprise the Zep litigation team in this and related litigation pending in U.S. District Court and before the International Trade Commission.

Farella Braun + Martel represents clients throughout the United States and abroad in sophisticated business transactions and high-stakes commercial, civil and criminal litigation. Founded in 1962, the firm is headquartered in San Francisco and maintains an office in the Napa Valley focused on the wine industry. Farella Braun + Martel lawyers are known for their imaginative legal solutions, dynamism and intellectual creativity. With an unwavering service ethic and interdisciplinary team approach, the firm is committed to advancing clients' objectives in the most effective, coordinated and efficient manner. Farella Braun + Martel is a green business. www.fbm.com

Contacts:

Melinda Hepp / Traci Stuart  
Blattel Communications
415.397.4811 
[email protected] / [email protected]

Cheryl Loof                                      
Farella Braun + Martel LLP               
415.954.4433                                     
[email protected]

# # #

Firm Highlights

Publication

Breaking up the Patent Monopoly for the Benefit of Batteries

The patent monopoly is at odds with the global need for battery storage technology. As the world mobilizes towards climate change solutions, companies with battery patents will face increasing pressure to share this critical...

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Elevates Five to Partner

Read More
Publication

How Antitrust and Unfair Competition Laws Affect Platform Providers’ Relationships With ISVs, API Developers, and Scrapers

A wide variety of business and consumer platforms host mutually beneficial ecosystems. But these ecosystems are also fraught with antitrust risk that arises when platforms try to terminate or modify the terms of third-party...

Read More
Publication

Artificial Intelligence Can’t Patent Inventions: So What?

The USPTO’s  recent landmark decision  ( 16/524,350 ) concluding artificial intelligence (AI) cannot be a named patent inventor perhaps sparked fears of super-robots inventing critical technologies that, alas, receive no patent protection. If an...

Read More
Event

Cannabis IP: Using Intellectual Property to Protect Your Assets and Grow Your Business

Join Nate Garhart and Ashley Roybal-Reid in the discussion on "Cannabis IP: Using Intellectual Property to Protect Your Assets and Grow Your Business." Intellectual property (IP) is a critical issue in the cannabis industry...

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Ranked Among “Best Law Firms” by U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers

SAN FRANCISCO, November 5, 2020: Farella Braun + Martel earned national and regional rankings across a number of practice areas in the U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers® release of the “Best...

Read More
Publication

Insights Into the First Patent Trial in Waco, Texas - MV3 Partners v. Roku

A 7-person jury in Waco, Texas, recently returned its verdict in the first patent trial held before Judge Albright: defense verdict, no finding of infringement. In the MV3 Partners v. Roku dispute, MV3 Partners...

Read More
News

3 Things To Know After Busy WDTX Patent Judge's 1st Trial

Eugene Mar spoke to Law360 about the  MV3 Partners LLC v. Roku Inc.  case in the article, " 3 Things To Know After Busy WDTX Patent Judge's 1st Trial." In the article, Eugene said he's...

Read More
Publication

Three Steps Licensees Can Take to Protect Their IP Rights in Bankruptcy

During periods of widespread economic disruption such as the present, operating businesses must be able to identify and respond to threats to the financial health of their contracting counterparts in order to protect key...

Read More
News

Farella Braun Files Amicus Brief in Support of Humanitarian Organizations in Ninth Circuit Appeal of WhatsApp v. NSO

SAN FRANCISCO, December 23, 2020: Northern California legal powerhouse Farella Braun + Martel today submitted an amicus brief in support of civil society organizations in the NSO Group v. WhatsApp appeal pending before the...

Read More