Insights
Publications

Blurring The Line Between Foreign and Domestic: The Expansion of Search Warrant Powers Overseas

5/10/2017 Articles

A dispute in California federal court over whether Google must turn over documents stored overseas in response to a search warrant may have major implications for white collar practitioners and their clients. Last week Google asked a California federal judge to review an order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler that required the company to produce content stored outside the United States in response to a warrant. U.S. District Judge William Alsup will hear Google’s motion for de novo review of the order on June 22. In the order at issue, Judge Beeler denied Google’s motion to quash a warrant issued pursuant to the Stored Communications Act (SCA), 18 U.S.C. § 2703. The SCA, in part, requires the disclosure of customer communications or records by internet service providers pursuant to a warrant. The warrant sought documents related to specific Google email accounts, including subscriber information, evidence of specified crimes, and information about the account holders’ true identities, locations, and assets. Google produced information it stored domestically, but argued that the warrant could not reach information stored abroad. Google argued that its legal team in the United States were the only personnel authorized to access and produce the communications, which could be accessed from within the United States. Matter of Search of Content that is Stored at Premises Controlled by Google, No. 16-MC-80263-LB, 2017 WL 1487625, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2017).

Despite acknowledging that Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure regarding search warrants limits their territorial reach to federal districts, that the SCA does not specify whether its warrant provision applies outside the United States, and that there is a presumption against the SCA’s extraterritorial application, the Court held that Google must “produce all content responsive to the search warrant that is retrievable from the United States, regardless of the data’s actual location.” Id. at *1, 4. Judge Beeler reasoned that the “disclosure is a domestic application of the SCA,” as the “conduct relevant to the focus—and what the SCA seeks to regulate—is disclosure of the data in the service provider’s possession.” Because Google is located in the district and subject to the court’s jurisdiction, and the warrant was directed at “the only place where [Google] can access and deliver the information that the government seeks,” the warrant could reach documents stored overseas. Id. at *4. In ordering so, Judge Beeler followed the dissenters in the Second Circuit’s decision, Matter of Warrant to Search a Certain E-Mail Account Controlled & Maintained by Microsoft Corp., 829 F.3d 197, 203 (2d Cir. 2016).

Google is now relying on the Microsoft case to argue that Judge Beeler’s order was an unlawful extraterritorial application of the Stored Communications Act. In the Microsoft case, the Second Circuit held that the government could not compel production of Microsoft’s email account data stored in Dublin, Ireland. The Second Circuit reasoned that “[a]s the term is used in the Constitution, a warrant is traditionally moored to privacy concepts applied within the territory of the United States” and that the Stored Communications Act’s legislative history “supports [the] conclusion that Congress intended to invoke the term ‘warrant’ with all of its traditional, domestic connotations.” Id. at 212-13. Thus, even though Microsoft admitted that it could “collect” the information stored in Ireland from certain of its U.S. offices and bring that data into the U.S., forcing it to do so would be unlawful. Id. at 203, 222. The government plans to appeal the Second Circuit decision to the Supreme Court.

For white collar practitioners, this circuit split is one to watch. The notion that warrants traditionally carry domestic territorial limitations is a critical protection based on Fourth Amendment privacy concerns. If the law were expanded to allow warrants to automatically reach information stored abroad on the basis that it is accessible from the United States, this could have wide-ranging implications for companies and individuals subject to government investigations. The government may begin to demand that evidence stored in overseas repositories be turned over as a matter of course. As technology continues to blur the lines between what is foreign and domestic, the physical location of stored electronic data may become an inquiry of the past. The search warrant, already one of the most powerful tools the government has at its disposal, could become vastly more effective at helping the government make its case.

Firm Highlights

Publication

A Primer for Corporate Directors: Maximizing Internal Investigation Effectiveness and Efficiency

In corporate America and across the globe, allegations of wrongdoing within companies are increasingly common, and the high cost of internal investigations continues apace.  In 2021, in an anonymous survey of more than 1,330...

Read More
Publication

Nonprofit Basics: Document Retention Policies and Subpoenas, and a Conversation With Aviva Gilbert on Why Good Policies Matter

Welcome to EO Radio Show – Your Nonprofit Legal Resource . This Nonprofit Basics episode covers record retention policies, document destruction schedules, and why they matter. You may have noticed that the IRS Form...

Read More
Publication

Maximizing Internal Investigation Effectiveness & Efficiency

In corporate America and across the globe, allegations of wrongdoing within companies are increasingly common, and the high cost of internal investigations continues apace. Companies are now also routinely investigating allegations beyond violations of...

Read More
Publication

Cybersecurity Regulation: Key Takeaways From an Unusual FTC Order That Will Follow CEO for a Decade

The FTC recently issued a proposed order that would settle an enforcement action against Drizly, LLC and its co-founder and CEO, James Rellas, arising from data breaches in 2018 and 2020 that affected over...

Read More
Publication

The Humility To Prepare and the Confidence To Pull It off With Doug Young

Mike Herring interviews past ACTL President Doug Young in this episode of  Trial Tested: A Podcast by the American College of Trial Lawyers . S3E6: The Humility To Prepare and the Confidence To Pull It off With...

Read More
News

Sarah Good Appointed to California State Bar Board of Trustees

Read More
Publication

Uber’s Former Chief Security Officer Found Guilty of Obstruction For Coverup of Data Breaches

On October 5, 2022, after a monthlong jury trial, former Uber Chief Information Security Officer Joseph Sullivan was found guilty of obstructing proceedings of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and misprision of a felony...

Read More
News

Farella Names Carolina de Armas and Hilary Krase As Leadership Council on Legal Diversity Pathfinders

Carolina de Armas and Hilary Krase
Read More
News

Aviva Gilbert Named a Leadership Council on Legal Diversity Fellow

Aviva Gilbert Headshot at Farella Braun + Martel
Read More
Publication

Internal Investigations for Nonprofits: A Means of Identifying and Addressing Misconduct Before the Regulators Come Calling

The worst nightmare for most nonprofit board members is a complaint that sparks an investigation of misconduct at the organization. The ember may have been burning for some time before the board becomes aware...

Read More