Insights
Publications

California Governor Enacts Special Paycheck Rules For Temporary Workers And Criminal Penalties For Falsified Timesheets

9/9/2008 Articles

Although Governor Schwarzenegger had vowed not to sign any new legislation until a budget agreement is reached, two new wage and hour laws will take effect on January 1, 2009.

Paycheck Rules for Temporary Workers

As most employers are aware, when an employee is involuntarily terminated, California law requires that their final paycheck be issued on their last day of work.  The California Supreme Court had held that this rule could be imposed when a temporary worker completed a single-day assignment, even if the worker might receive intermittent future assignments.  (Smith v. L'Oreal, 39 Cal. 4th 77 (2006)).  Senate Bill 940, signed earlier this session, effectively reverses that Court decision, clarifying that the end of a temporary assignment for such workers does not qualify as a termination or "discharge," and thus the payment of final wages is not required.  At the same time, the law imposes certain protections for the benefit of temp workers:  they must be paid weekly, and no later than the regular payday of the calendar week following the performance of services.  If non-clerical temp workers are assigned to a client on a "day-to-day" basis, meaning that they either report to the agency in the morning before traveling to the client, or report back to the agency at the end of the day, the worker must be paid on a daily basis.  Temporary workers assigned to a client in a trade dispute must also be paid on a daily basis.   The law makes clear, however, that when temp workers are permanently "discharged" from their employer, rather than simply in-between projects, they must be paid in the same timetable as other workers.  If involuntarily terminated, final wages are due on their last day of work and, likewise, if they resign, they must be paid within 72 hours of their final day or on the last day of work, whichever is later.  Failure to provide finial wages in accordance with the statute continues to expose the employer to liability for up to 30 days of continued wages.

Temporary/contract staffing companies should examine their payroll practice and the new amendment to Labor Code section 201.3, to assure they are in compliance by January 1, 2009.  In fact, any employers using occasional or temporary workers should re-examine the scheduling and payment methods for these employees so as to avoid inadvertent violation of this new law, and consult counsel with any questions on how the new law may apply to their workforce.

Legal Penalties for Falsified Timesheets

In a second bill signed into law this session, California has strengthened the legal penalties for timesheet falsification by employers.  Although we typically associate timesheet fraud with unscrupulous employees, recent high profile cases have exposed employers that have attempted to avoid wage claims by requiring their employees to sign timecards which allegedly under-reported their hours worked, or which falsely stated that employees had been provided with required meal and rest breaks.  Under A. B. 2075, which amends Labor Code Section 206.5, it will become illegal on January 1, 2009 for an employer to require an employee, as a condition of being paid, to sign a false statement of hours worked. Violation of the law is a misdemeanor, and employers would remain potentially liable for penalties relating to unpaid overtime or missed breaks.

While this new law may prove to be a strong weapon against dishonest operators, it also presents a potential trap for unwary employers.  Any employer that requires employees to verify and affirm their hours worked through an automated timekeeping system should be certain that its managers and Human Resources professionals are trained on the need to verify those time sheets, and are aware of the need to investigate any claim by an employee that the timesheet is inaccurate.  Failure to do so could now lead to criminal accusations since many automated timekeeping systems will not process a time sheet until an employee has verified the hours worked.  In sum, this new law presents a good reason for employers to review their time keeping and pay systems to be sure that employees do not feel coerced into signing false time cards in order to be paid wages due.

Firm Highlights

Publication

The Election Season Is Upon Us: Guidance for Managing Political Expression in the California Workplace

In a year of extraordinary events, this election has been more divisive and controversial than any other in recent history. Many employers are grappling with how they should manage political expression in the workplace...

Read More
News

Employers Deal With Workers’ Lost Vaccination Cards

Holly Sutton was interviewed by SHRM for the article, "Employers Deal With Workers’ Lost Vaccination Cards." Read the article here .

Read More
Publication

Employment Law Issues to Consider Before Including Work Made for Hire Clauses in Contractor Agreements

For most employers, it is important to own the intellectual property rights in written and/or graphic work commissioned from independent contractors.  But including a Work Made for Hire Clause (“WMFH Clause”) in an independent...

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Elevates Five to Partner

Read More
Publication

Law Updates for California Employers: COVID Sick Leave Obligations, Meal-Period Rules, COBRA Benefits

New legislation and a recent court decision have significant implications for California employers. Certain California employers must now provide supplemental paid sick leave to employees who miss work for specified reasons related to the...

Read More
Publication

California Employers Face Various New Laws in January 2021

The California Legislature passed and Governor Newsom signed several new laws covering topics ranging from COVID-19 to leaves of absence to data reporting. Most of these laws take effect January 1, so now is a...

Read More
Event

Returning to the Office: Legal and Practical Considerations for Keeping Your Team Safe

Join Ashley Breakfield (moderator) with panelists Holly Sutton and Tom Cashin from Shorenstein, in the discussion on “Returning to the Office: Legal and Practical Considerations for Keeping Your Team Safe.”  COVID-19 shelter-in-place mandates caused employers to...

Read More
Event

Management Anti-Harassment Training for Exempt Organization Professionals

California employment law requires employers in every industry, including  exempt organizations to create a workplace safe from harassment, discrimination, bullying, and sexual predation. The responsibility for this mandatory training falls on employers, and when...

Read More
News

Farella Names Rebecca Stephens and Nadia Arid As LCLD 2021 Pathfinders

Farella Braun + Martel is proud to announce that senior associate Rebecca Stephens and associate Nadia Arid were selected to be members of the 2021 class of Leadership Council on Legal Diversity (LCLD) Pathfinders...

Read More
Publication

Equal Pay Data Reporting, An Asset for the Strategic Employer

Holly Sutton with Farella Braun + Martel, and co-speaker Erin Hastings with Seiler, discuss "Equal Pay Data Reporting, an Asset for the Strategic Employer." California’s recently passed SB973 requires certain employers to collect and...

Read More