Insights
Publications

California’s Approach to Eviction Moratoriums

August 8, 2021 Articles
CIRE Magazine

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a variety of eviction moratoriums enacted by local, state, and federal governments in the United States. The California state moratorium was recently extended and modified, giving residential landlords the ability to opt out of a newly created rental assistance program. In addition, commercial eviction moratoriums enacted by many cities and counties remain in effect or have recently expired, including in San Francisco, Oakland, Alameda County, Contra Costa County, and Santa Clara County.

Residential eviction moratoriums have garnered significant attention since first appearing in March 2020. Federal eviction moratoriums, such as the Centers for Disease Control's order, have also raised questions about the constitutionality of such protections and whether statutory authority exists to issue such sweeping protections. Neither federal eviction moratoriums nor California's statewide moratoriums have extended protection from evictions beyond residential tenants.

While the state and federal moratoriums apply to residential tenancies, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed Executive Order N-28-20 in March 2020, authorizing individual cities and counties to halt evictions of commercial renters impacted by COVID-19 as well. Newsom has extended this order numerous times. The latest extension permits cities and counties throughout California to halt evictions of commercial tenants through September 30.

Bay Area municipalities have responded to Newsom's executive order by enacting eviction moratoriums that apply to commercial tenancies, many of which are still in effect. However, local eviction moratoriums vary greatly in scope and time of expiration. Therefore, it's essential for commercial landlords and tenants to familiarize themselves with any commercial eviction moratorium enacted in your city and county.

In San Francisco, the commercial eviction moratorium suspended the right of an owner to evict a covered commercial tenant who misses a rent payment during the moratorium period. The ordinance defined covered commercial tenants as any person or entity (including a subtenant) with the right to exclusive possession of commercial space provided that person or entity is registered to do business in San Francisco and has combined worldwide gross receipts for 2019 equal to or below $25 million. However, it did not cover tenants (other than 501(c)(3) nonprofit entities) that occupy space in property that is zoned or approved for office use. Finally, the ordinance only applied to evictions of covered tenants for nonpayment where the missed rent payment is both:

  1. Due between March 16, 2020, and September 30, 2021.
  2. Because of financial impacts resulting from COVID-19.

When a tenant qualified under the San Francisco moratorium, the landlord must give the tenant written notice and an opportunity to repay any missed rent during a forbearance period after the moratorium expires before attempting to recover possession of the premises. The forbearance period varied depending on the number of full-time equivalent employees (FTE) the tenant has. In other words, the earliest possible eviction for nonpayment of rent was the end of the moratorium period (September 30) plus the applicable forbearance period.

Moreover, so-called “Tier 1” tenants — that is, tenants with 10 or fewer FTEs — had the option to terminate their leases early if they are unable to pay rent due to COVID-19-related financial impacts. Commercial landlords may have been able to recover possession early (i.e., before the end of the forbearance period) if the landlord owns less than 25,000 SF of gross floor area and can demonstrate that a significant financial hardship is created by the inability to evict.

Alameda County's commercial eviction moratorium, which expired June 30, had the greatest scope of those explored in this article. The county's moratorium applied to any affected business, defined as any tenant that has experienced a qualifying loss. Therefore, Alameda County's was not limited to small businesses and nonprofits.

Alameda County's commercial eviction moratorium demonstrates the importance that landlords and tenants understand all applicable local eviction moratoriums. The moratorium covered “all commercial tenants/properties in the unincorporated area (Ashland, Castro Valley, Cherryland, San Lorenzo, Fairview, Sunol, and parts of East County).” Accordingly, the county's moratorium did not apply to tenants and properties in a city, in which case the county directs tenants and landlords to look to the appropriate city's moratorium. In contrast, some counties enacted a commercial eviction moratorium that includes all cities within the county — unincorporated or not — such as Marin County.

Oakland is one of several cities within Alameda County to enact a commercial eviction moratorium (along with Alameda, Albany, Berkeley, Hayward, Newark, and Union City). Oakland's commercial eviction moratorium covers small business tenants, defined as a business having fewer than 100 employees, average annual gross receipts of $15 million or less, and a principal office located in California. Under Oakland's moratorium, a commercial tenant cannot be evicted if documented nonpayment of rent was caused by “a substantial decrease in income (including, but not limited to, a decrease due to a reduction in hours or consumer demand)” caused by COVID-19 or governmental response to COVID-19. The moratorium extends through the end of the local emergency as declared by the City of Oakland last March, which presently does not have a defined end date. Notably, Oakland's commercial eviction moratorium covers all 501(c)(3) nonprofit entities, regardless of size. Accordingly, Oakland's moratorium ensures that no nonprofit will be evicted for nonpayment of rent due to a substantial decrease in income caused by COVID-19.

Contra Costa County's commercial eviction moratorium was similar to Oakland's as it pertains to small business qualification factors and the protections afforded thereunder. Contra Costa County's moratorium expired on September 30, 2021.

Santa Clara County's commercial eviction moratorium, which also expired June 30, demonstrated the extent to which local moratoriums vary. Unlike San Francisco and Oakland, Santa Clara County's Ordinance relied on the U.S. Small Business Administration's (SBA) definitions of small businesses based on industry. The SBA's size standards vary by industry based on the number of employees or annual receipts. Furthermore, in contrast to the increased protection offered to nonprofit entities under San Francisco and Oakland's eviction moratoriums, Santa Clara County's moratorium did not exempt nonprofits from its small business qualification limitations. In Santa Clara County, a commercial tenant could not be evicted if nonpayment of rent was caused by “substantial income loss and/or substantial out-of-pocket medical expenses that are directly related to your failure to pay rent as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.” Small business tenants under the ordinance have up to six months after the moratorium expires or terminates to repay at least 50 percent of the past-due rent. Tenants have up to 12 months after the moratorium expires or terminates to repay in full the past-due rent. Santa Clara County extended the moratorium through August 18, 2021, from the previous expiration date of April 30, 2021.

If you are a commercial landlord in California, you should familiarize yourself with any commercial eviction moratorium enacted in your city and county. Additionally, you should be aware of whether or not you have tenants that qualify for the moratorium and be prepared for the possibility that they may seek to take advantage of it. Finally, compare the applicable county versus city moratorium that applies in your situation. There may be instances in which a city's moratorium affords more (or less) protection than does the applicable county's moratorium. Similarly, commercial tenants experiencing financial hardship due to the pandemic should familiarize themselves with their local commercial eviction moratorium as it may provide important protections.

Firm Highlights

News

Farella Represents Far Niente Winery in its Acquisition of Provenance Vineyards

Northern California legal powerhouse Farella Braun + Martel represented Napa Valley luxury wine producer Far Niente Family of Wineries & Vineyards in its acquisition of the Provenance Vineyards real estate in Rutherford, Calif. from Treasury...

Read More
Publication

Returning to the Office: Legal and Practical Considerations for Keeping Your Team Safe

Farella's Ashley Breakfield (moderator) and Holly Sutton, along with guest speaker Tom Cashin from Shorenstein, discuss “Returning to the Office: Legal and Practical Considerations for Keeping Your Team Safe.” COVID-19 shelter-in-place mandates caused employers to close their...

Read More
News

Farella Welcomes Christopher Rendall-Jackson to Energy + Infrastructure and Real Estate Industry Groups

Headshot of Chris Rendall-Jackson
Read More
Publication

Fire Season Preparedness: What Wineries Should Do Now - Video

Farella's Quinn Arntsen and MaryJo Lopez with guest speaker Christopher Thompson of Napa Communities Firewise Foundation discuss "Fire Season Preparedness: What Wineries Should Do Now." California is at the start of another dry year...

Read More
News

What’s Ahead for California Wine Industry With Laws and Regulations - Q&A

More than wine, area lawyers specializing in the wine business have been forced in the past year to take on a number of critical issues. That includes regulations that were put in place to help...

Read More
Publication

Eviction Moratoriums and Commercial Leasing: Current Issues

Farella's Tony Schoenberg and Jonah Trotz with guest speakers Marsha Ramsey and Margaret Duskin of Cushman & Wakefield discuss "Eviction Moratoriums and Commercial Leasing: Current Issues." The pandemic has had wide ranging impacts on...

Read More
News

51 Farella Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2022 and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch

Forty-six Farella Braun + Martel lawyers were selected by their peers for inclusion in the 2022 edition of The Best Lawyers in America © .  Five Farella lawyers were named to Best Lawyers: Ones to...

Read More
News

Ashley Breakfield Appointed to 2022 CREW SF Board of Directors

Read More
Publication

How Changes to California’s Fire Regulations Could Affect North Coast Housing Projects

Both the Board of Forestry and the State Senate are considering changes to state fire regulations that would affect real estate development in California. The first set of changes can be found in the...

Read More
Publication

What California Wineries Need to Know Now to Prepare for Fire Season

California is at the start of another dry year, with increased likelihood that the North Bay will experience another active fire season. Fires are always a risk and they are always unpredictable — preparing...

Read More