Insights
Publications

EPA Proposes Clarification on CERCLA’s “All Appropriate Inquiry” Standard

6/20/2014 Articles

Step by step, inch by inch.  Slowly but diligently, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has been working to clarify what standards and practices may be used for conducting “all appropriate inquiries” (AAI) under the federal Superfund law, or the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act “CERCLA.”  Prospective purchasers of contaminated property are eagerly awaiting a final rule that will clarify what standards apply to Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, the “gold standard” for identifying the potential presence of hazardous substances on, under or around a property prior to acquisition.

In a proposed rule published in the Federal Register on June 17, 2014, EPA seeks to amend its current AAI Rule to reflect that ASTM International’s current E1527-13 “Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process” should be used in lieu of ASTM’s prior E1527-05 Standard in order to satisfy CERCLA’s AAI requirements.  EPA has given the public 30 days to comment on the proposed rule, with comments due by July 17, 2014.  Depending on the comments it receives, EPA indicates that it “may” publish a final rule to remove the existing reference to the ASTM E1527-05 Standard in the AAI Rule.  This final rule, if promulgated, would take effect one year later, in approximately mid-2015.  Until then, EPA has made it clear that parties conducting Phase I Environmental Site Assessments may continue to utilize either ASTM Standard – E1527-05 or E1527-13 – to comply with AAI requirements.

By way of background, prospective purchasers seeking liability relief under CERCLA’s landowner liability protections (i.e., innocent landowners, bona fide prospective purchasers and contiguous property owners), as well as recipients of EPA Brownfields grants for conducting site assessments, must comply with various standards and practices for conducting AAI. When EPA promulgated its AAI Rule in 2005, EPA expressly acknowledged at that time that prospective purchasers conducting due diligence could use the procedures included in ASTM Standard E1527-05 to comply with AAI requirements.  In 2013, ASTM updated its 2005 Phase I Standard by providing, among other things, clarifications to its definition of “Recognized Environmental Conditions,” new requirements for assessing vapor release and migration conditions, and additional procedures for conducting agency file reviews. While the E1527-13 Standard is expected to enhance the identification of historical releases and recognized environmental conditions at a property as compared against the prior E1527-05 Standard, environmental consultants generally acknowledge that it will be more costly and time consuming to perform Phase I assessments using the updated 2013 Standard as opposed to using the 2005 Standard. 

In earlier rulemakings in August 2013 and December 2013, EPA recognized both 2005 and 2013 ASTM Standards as satisfying AAI requirements, creating confusion among the regulated community and consulting industry as to which standard should be used in conducting Phase I assessments. With this current proposed rulemaking, EPA now seeks to promote the use of ASTM’s updated E1527-13 Standard and “reduce any confusion associated with the regulatory reference to a historical standard that is no longer recognized by its own promulgating organization as meeting its standards for good customary business practice.” However, until EPA issues a final rule removing the E1527-05 reference from the AAI Rule, confusion will likely continue regarding the appropriate ASTM Standard to use for performing Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, as prospective purchasers and their consultants will still have the option of using the E1527-05 Standard to meet their AAI obligations. 

So, what ASTM Standard should prospective purchasers use to satisfy their AAI obligations? Conducting a Phase I based on the E1527-05 Standard is still acceptable, and may be less time consuming and less costly to perform as compared to using the E1527-13 Standard. However, prospective purchasers should keep in mind that other parties involved in their transactions (e.g., investors, lenders, prospective tenants) may be expecting or even requiring a more rigorous environmental assessment to be performed based on ASTM’s updated E1527-13 Standard.

Firm Highlights

Publication

New EPA Clean Water Act Rule Attempts to Streamline Permitting Process

Earlier this week, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency finalized the “Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification Rule” (Rule). The Rule comes with significant procedural and substantive changes to the certification process for infrastructure projects. Under...

Read More
Publication

New Screening Levels for Key PFAS Chemicals Will Spur Regulatory Action at Contaminated Sites

In support of the State Water Resources Control Board’s (State Board) efforts to investigate and evaluate the public health effects of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board...

Read More
Event

LSI's PFAS Contamination and Regulation in California Virtual Conference

Sarah Bell will be speaking at LSI's virtual conference on PFAS Contamination and Regulation in California live webinar, "PFAS and Hazardous Materials Cleanup Laws." Details: CWA violations, CERCLA designations, and NRD claims as potential game...

Read More
Publication

Supreme Court Ruling Expands Reach of Clean Water Act NPDES Permitting

Read the article on California Ag Net , here . In April, the United States Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling clarifying the reach of the federal Clean Water Act. The Court decided that a...

Read More
Publication

Key PFAS Regulatory Standards Set in California

In support of California’s efforts to investigate and evaluate the presence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the environment, the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board) has released interim...

Read More
News

52 Farella Braun + Martel Attorneys Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2021

Read More
News

EPA’s New Guidance Mandate Leaves Superfund Cleanup Less Certain

Sarah Bell commented in the Bloomberg Law article "EPA’s New Guidance Mandate Leaves Superfund Cleanup Less Certain."    Read the full article here .

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Ranked Among “Best Law Firms” by U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers

SAN FRANCISCO, November 5, 2020: Farella Braun + Martel earned national and regional rankings across a number of practice areas in the U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers® release of the “Best...

Read More
Publication

The Winding Trail Home: Marin County Secures Key Multi-Use Trail Access Decision

With Marin County’s Mt. Tamalpais often considered the birthplace of mountain biking, it should not be surprising that the County finds itself at the forefront of California’s battle over multi-use trail access and consequently...

Read More
News

EPA Narrows States’ Veto Power Over Infrastructure Projects

Environmental Law Partner Sarah Bell spoke to Bloomberg Law about EPA rule (RIN: 2040-AF86 ), which aims to discourage coastal states from relying on part of the Clean Water Act to block fossil fuel...

Read More