Insights
Publications

Facebook Suspends Apps That Scrape Data From Its Platform Following Cambridge Analytica Scandal

September 20, 2019 Articles

Facebook announced today that it has suspended tens of thousands of apps from interoperating with the Facebook platform alleging misuse of Facebook members’ personal data. This is a continuation of the Cambridge Analytica saga that has plagued Facebook since the 2016 presidential election. Earlier this year, the FTC levied a record-breaking $5 billion fine on Facebook for its misuse of member personal information.

After announcing this recent round of app developer terminations, at least one app developer trapped in Facebook’s dragnet has cried foul and filed a complaint claiming that it did nothing wrong. Stating that it only uses publicly available information from Facebook and that Facebook had thoroughly vetted its application as part of its various partner programs, and arguing further that Facebook is a monopolist using "scorched earth” tactics, the app developer is demanding that it be allowed to continue accessing data from Facebook.

The new case is likely to build from the hiQ Labs v. LinkedIn precedent, in which hiQ Labs, a venture capital-backed app developer represented by Farella Braun + Martel, obtained a preliminary injunction preventing LinkedIn from terminating its access to LinkedIn member public profile information. hiQ raised sufficient questions as to whether LinkedIn could utilize the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, an anti-hacking statute from the eighties, to restrict hiQ's access to member profiles that the profile owner had expressly designated public. Furthermore, hiQ raised sufficient questions as to whether LinkedIn’s motives in terminating hiQ were anti-competitive and constituted an intentional interference with hiQ’s economic relationships. In light of these questions and the irreparable harm that LinkedIn’s actions would cause hiQ, the court enjoined LinkedIn to allow hiQ to continue accessing member public profiles on the LinkedIn platform.

The Ninth Circuit recently affirmed the injunction against LinkedIn. See opinion, here.

Firm Highlights

Publication

Who 'Owns' a Secret? Whether Trade Secret Licensees Have Standing to Sue in California

If the eye-popping damages awards in several recent lawsuits are any indication, companies are increasingly coming to see their private information as one of their most valuable assets—and California juries apparently agree. For example...

Read More
Publication

Securing Against Trade Secret Pitfalls and Dangers Arising From Employee Mobility Situations

Published on ACCDocket.com . By Walt Norfleet, Smiths Group plc and Eugene Y. Mar, Farella Braun + Martel LLP Picture this: Your company is in a highly competitive industry with several leading players heavily supported...

Read More
Publication

What California’s New Security Law Means to Your Business

Commonsense IoT security steps that startups and small business should consider to comply with California’s new law California recently enacted a new law, Senate Bill 327, that requires companies that make Internet of Things...

Read More
Publication

3 Trends in Criminal Trade Secret Prosecution

Criminal trade secret prosecutions are on the rise nationwide and in the Northern District of California, especially cases relating to alleged theft by Chinese nationals and entities. According to a 2017 report by the...

Read More
News

Jeff Fisher Named Among California’s 2019 Top Trade Secrets Lawyers by the Daily Journal

SAN FRANCISCO, October 9, 2019: Farella Braun + Martel is proud to announce that Jeffrey M. Fisher was named among the “Top Trade Secrets Lawyers” in California by the Daily Journal . Fisher has...

Read More
Publication

Practices to Protect Trade Secrets in Failed Acquisitions and Customer Relationships

Published on  ACCDocket.com . By Walt Norfleet, Smiths Group plc and Eugene Y. Mar, Farella Braun + Martel LLP In part one of this three-part series on best practices for protecting trade secrets and guarding...

Read More
Event

Litigating Civil and Criminal Trade Secret Cases: Trends, Best Practices, and Lessons Learned

Trade secret litigation is on the rise, both civil litigation and follow-on criminal prosecution for trade secret theft. Companies are grappling with how to protect their valuable information and minimize risk in their technological...

Read More
Publication

How Defense Strategies Can Go Awry When Pursuing Concurrent PTAB Relief in Financial Services Patent Litigation

United States Automobile Association (USAA), a financial services company that provides insurance, banking, investment, and retirement products and services for members of the military and their families, filed a surprising patent infringement complaint against Wells Fargo...

Read More
News

Benchmark California 2020 Ranks Farella Among Top Litigation Firms

Doug Young named among Top 20 Trial Lawyers in California SAN FRANCISCO, October 16, 2019: Farella Braun + Martel continues to be ranked among the top litigation firms by Benchmark California 2020, a guide...

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Ranked Among “Best Law Firms” by U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers

Read More