Insights
Publications

Facebook Suspends Apps That Scrape Data From Its Platform Following Cambridge Analytica Scandal

September 20, 2019 Articles

Facebook announced today that it has suspended tens of thousands of apps from interoperating with the Facebook platform alleging misuse of Facebook members’ personal data. This is a continuation of the Cambridge Analytica saga that has plagued Facebook since the 2016 presidential election. Earlier this year, the FTC levied a record-breaking $5 billion fine on Facebook for its misuse of member personal information.

After announcing this recent round of app developer terminations, at least one app developer trapped in Facebook’s dragnet has cried foul and filed a complaint claiming that it did nothing wrong. Stating that it only uses publicly available information from Facebook and that Facebook had thoroughly vetted its application as part of its various partner programs, and arguing further that Facebook is a monopolist using "scorched earth” tactics, the app developer is demanding that it be allowed to continue accessing data from Facebook.

The new case is likely to build from the hiQ Labs v. LinkedIn precedent, in which hiQ Labs, a venture capital-backed app developer represented by Farella Braun + Martel, obtained a preliminary injunction preventing LinkedIn from terminating its access to LinkedIn member public profile information. hiQ raised sufficient questions as to whether LinkedIn could utilize the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, an anti-hacking statute from the eighties, to restrict hiQ's access to member profiles that the profile owner had expressly designated public. Furthermore, hiQ raised sufficient questions as to whether LinkedIn’s motives in terminating hiQ were anti-competitive and constituted an intentional interference with hiQ’s economic relationships. In light of these questions and the irreparable harm that LinkedIn’s actions would cause hiQ, the court enjoined LinkedIn to allow hiQ to continue accessing member public profiles on the LinkedIn platform.

The Ninth Circuit recently affirmed the injunction against LinkedIn. See opinion, here.

Firm Highlights

Publication

Litigation Management Checklist in the Time of COVID-19

We are all experiencing unprecedented challenges right now, both personally and professionally. To ease some of your legal team’s anxieties, we have put together a litigation-specific checklist with the measures we recommend taking, which...

Read More
Publication

Practices to Protect Trade Secrets in Failed Acquisitions and Customer Relationships

Published on  ACCDocket.com . By Walt Norfleet, Smiths Group plc and Eugene Y. Mar, Farella Braun + Martel LLP In part one of this three-part series on best practices for protecting trade secrets and guarding...

Read More
Publication

What California’s New Security Law Means to Your Business

Commonsense IoT security steps that startups and small business should consider to comply with California’s new law California recently enacted a new law, Senate Bill 327, that requires companies that make Internet of Things...

Read More
Publication

How Defense Strategies Can Go Awry When Pursuing Concurrent PTAB Relief in Financial Services Patent Litigation

United States Automobile Association (USAA), a financial services company that provides insurance, banking, investment, and retirement products and services for members of the military and their families, filed a surprising patent infringement complaint against Wells Fargo...

Read More
News

Sushila Chanana Named to 2020 Leadership Council on Legal Diversity Fellows Program

SAN FRANCISCO, February 13, 2020: Farella Braun + Martel is proud to announce that Sushila Chanana has been named a member of the 2020 class of Fellows participating in a landmark program created by...

Read More
News

Gov't Drops IP Theft Charges Against Ex-Jawbone Workers

Law360 reported that the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California in San Jose moved to dismiss all trade-secret-theft charges against the remaining four defendants in what was originally a six-defendant case...

Read More
Publication

Securing Against Trade Secret Pitfalls and Dangers Arising From Employee Mobility Situations

Published on ACCDocket.com . By Walt Norfleet, Smiths Group plc and Eugene Y. Mar, Farella Braun + Martel LLP Picture this: Your company is in a highly competitive industry with several leading players heavily supported...

Read More
News

Daily Journal Names Farella Lawyers Among Top IP Lawyers in California

Farella Braun + Martel is proud to announce that partners Jeffrey M. Fisher and James L. Day were named to the 2020 list of “Top Intellectual Property Lawyers” in California by the Daily Journal...

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Announces 2020 Partner Elevations

SAN FRANCISCO/ST. HELENA, Calif., January 21, 2020: Northern California legal powerhouse Farella Braun + Martel is pleased to announce the election of senior associates Evan Abrams, Lauren Galbraith, and Alex Reese to the partnership...

Read More
Publication

Trade Secret Hygiene for Current Employees

Published on  ACCDocket.com . By Walt Norfleet, Smiths Group plc and Eugene Y. Mar, Farella Braun + Martel LLP In the first two parts of this series on best practices in protecting trade secrets, we...

Read More