Insights
Publications

Growers Can Lien on Distressed Wineries

5/19/2014 Articles

Published in the North Bay Business Journal

A lot goes into the making of great wine, and when a winery becomes financially unstable, there are a lot of competing interests that need to be satisfied, including the banks that provide the winery with financing, the growers that provide the winery with grapes, the employees who provide services to the wine maker and the company that bottles and/or stores the wine.

If you are a grower of grapes that you supply to a winery for making wine, you may be in a better position to ensure payment than other parties, but you must be sure to take steps to protect your interests.

Under California law, every producer of farm products (including grapes) who sells “product” to a licensed processor automatically has a lien on all of the product sold and all processed items made from the product until the grower is paid in full for its product.

‘Perfected’ but ‘fully secured’?

The grower’s lien is “perfected” — valid against third parties — automatically upon delivery of the grapes to the processor (winery), without the need for filing or recording any document or providing any notice to third parties.

Furthermore, a grower’s lien extends to all product and processed items in the possession of the processor. That includes wine that is stored in a warehouse by the winery), and no segregation of a particular grower’s product is required.

Therefore, unless the winery segregates the grapes received from different growers — for example, using only one grower’s grapes in the winery’s cabernet sauvignon — the grower’s lien extends to all the wine in the winery’s “possession” that contains any of that grower’s grapes.

However, simply because a grower’s lien extends to all the winery’s finished product containing the grower’s grapes does not necessarily mean the grower is “fully secured.” If the total amount of multiple grower’s liens exceeds the total value of the finished product, the growers will share in the collateral pro rata, regardless of when the grapes were delivered. In other words, it is not first come, first served.

Extends to finished wine?

It is also important to note that once the grapes or wine leave the winery’s possession, the grower’s lien is extinguished, and it is currently unclear in California whether the grower would have a continuing lien in the proceeds from the sale of the finished wine. Although a winery that sells farm products, including wine, without paying the grower that provided the grapes is subject to criminal liability and may face suspension or revocation of its producer’s license, this may not be sufficient to stop the sale or transfer of the wine.

Therefore, a grower would be wise to make every effort to enforce its lien — including by attempting to obtain an injunction or temporary restraining order — to prevent a winery in distress from selling any of the wine before the grower gets paid.

Power through enforcement

A grower’s lien generally has priority over all other liens or claims, except labor claims for services rendered to the winery after delivery of the grapes and warehouse liens for any warehouse that may be storing the winery’s wine. Although the producer’s lien is considered a preferred lien in California, if a grower goes unpaid for its grapes and seeks to enforce its lien, generally the grower’s only option is to initiate a lawsuit to reclaim the grapes, juice or wine from the winery. In many instances, this can be cost-prohibitive.

If not cost-prohibitive, however, enforcement of a grower’s lien can be a powerful tool. Once a lawsuit is initiated, a grower can seek a preliminary injunction and/or temporary restraining order to prevent the winery from selling or otherwise transferring the grapes or wine, which would have the effect of extinguishing the lien. And once the claim is reduced to a judgment, the grower can execute on the judgment by levying on the grapes and or wine. That means, having the sheriff seize the wine and sell it to pay off the grower.

Reveal the ‘secret lien’

Because a grower’s lien arises automatically upon delivering the grapes to the winery, it is considered a “secret lien.” That means other creditors may not be aware of the lien, including other growers. As a result, a secured lender may be able to foreclose on all the winery’s collateral without the growers who provided the grapes ever being notified.

Therefore, growers dealing with a slow-paying winery would be wise to have the winery affirmatively grant the grower a security interest in the wine in a written agreement, and also file a UCC-1 financing statement to provide notice to third-parties of their lien.

Firm Highlights

Event

The Advocates’ Society Spring Symposium: The Advocate Making a Difference

Douglas Young is the keynote speaker at The Advocates’ Society Spring Symposium: The Advocate Making a Difference on April 28. The Advocates' Society and the American College of Trial Lawyers invite you to attend the...

Read More
Publication

Pandemic Restriction Challenges Face Uphill Battle in California

On Dec.16, 2020, in Midway Venture LLC v. County of San Diego, the San Diego Superior Court preliminarily enjoined enforcement of two COVID-19-related California public health restrictions as applied to two adult entertainment businesses...

Read More
News

Nevada Links Wins Summary Judgment Motion in Case Brought by United States

Northern California legal powerhouse Farella Braun + Martel successfully defended Nevada Links, Inc., the owner of a championship golf course in Las Vegas, Nevada, in a $100 million lawsuit brought by the United States...

Read More
Publication

Landlord-Tenant Dispute Resolution

Farella's Real Estate Webinar Series features Tony Schoenberg discussing "Landlord-Tenant Disputes and Challenges." The laws governing landlord-tenant relationships are complicated. Understanding your rights and legal obligations will help you protect yourself, your rental business, and...

Read More
Publication

Jurors, Justice and Technology

Douglas Young, Farella partner and president of the American College of Trial Lawyers, spoke with podcast host Howard Miller about requirements in jury selection and technology for jury and non-jury trials. Listen to the...

Read More
Publication

New Year, New CMS Price Transparency Rule For Hospitals

Transparency in health care pricing can help patients make informed decisions, increase competition, and drive down the cost of health care. Accordingly, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has promulgated a new...

Read More
Publication

Cannabis Disputes: How to Minimize Your Litigation Risks

Farella's Cannabis Industry Education Series features Tony Schoenberg and Cynthia Castillo discussing "Cannabis Disputes: How to Minimize Your Litigation Risks." The laws regulating the cannabis industry are quickly changing and evolving. Many disputes are a...

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Shortlisted for Three 2021 Benchmark Litigation Awards

Northern California legal powerhouse Farella Braun + Martel has been shortlisted for three 2021 Benchmark Litigation awards. The firm was shortlisted for “San Francisco Firm of the Year” and in the California White-Collar Crime...

Read More
News

Douglas Young Appointed Special Master in Wit v. United Behavioral Health

Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California has appointed Douglas R. Young to serve as special master in the Wit v. United Behavioral...

Read More
News

Sarah Good Appointed to California State Bar's Ad Hoc Commission on the Discipline System

Read More