Insights
Publications

Insurance Coverage Against Patent Infringement Suits by Non-Practicing Entities

11/26/2012 Articles

Looking for a possible new strategy to protect yourself against patent infringement lawsuits filed by non-practicing entities (NPEs)? There is an innovative new potential option to evaluate as part of your strategy to manage the threat and expense of NPE litigation.

In response to the continued rising tide of patent infringement lawsuits filed by NPEs, RPX Corporation and Aon Risk Solutions have recently announced that they will begin offering small and medium-size companies up to $2.5 million in insurance coverage against NPE lawsuits. The insurance is currently available only to U.S. based companies with $1 billion or less in annual revenue. Although RPX has long offered defensive patent licensing strategies to help companies combat NPEs, this is the first time that it has offered insurance aimed at protecting defendants from NPEs.

Numerous academics and legal market observers have noted the sharp rise in NPE lawsuits in recent years. For example, a 2012 study from Boston University School of Law found that NPE lawsuits are “growing rapidly” and that such suits imposed an estimated $29 billion in legal costs in 2011 alone.[1] The study further found that much of the burden of NPE lawsuits falls on small and medium-size companies: 82% of defendants in NPE cases are companies that generate less than $100 million in annual revenue.[2]

Not only are NPEs targeting companies of many different sizes, they are also expanding beyond traditional high-technology companies. For example, a 2012 study by PatentFreedom shows that although NPEs have historically targeted well-known technology companies more than others, NPEs are gradually shifting focus away from those top companies and broadening the range of targets they pursue.[3]

NPE lawsuits can pose a significant threat and create great uncertainty for smaller companies. A 2011 PricewaterhouseCoopers study of patent litigation shows that median damages awards in patent litigation have varied between $2 and $10 million in the past six years.

It is difficult to assess the value of this new insurance product in light of the lack of publicly available information about the terms of coverage and cost. Further information can be obtained by contacting RPX.


[1]           James Bessen and Michael J. Meurer, The Direct Costs from NPE Disputes 2 (Boston University School of Law, Working Paper No. 12-34), available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2091210.

[2]           Id.

[3]           See PatentFreedom, Exposure by Industry, available at https://www.patentfreedom.com/about-npes/industry/.

Firm Highlights

Publication

It Wasn’t Me, It Was the AI: Intellectual Property and Data Privacy Concerns With Nonprofits’ Use of Artificial Intelligence Systems

In today's rapidly changing technological landscape, artificial intelligence (AI) is making headlines and being discussed constantly. To be sure, AI provides a powerful tool to nonprofits in creating content and exploiting for countless cost-effective...

Read More
News

Winston Liaw Named a Leadership Council on Legal Diversity Fellow

Northern California legal powerhouse Farella Braun + Martel is proud to announce that Winston Liaw has been named a Leadership Council on Legal Diversity (LCLD) Fellow for 2024. Winston joins a select group of...

Read More
Publication

Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence: AI Copyright Law and Fair Use on Trial

On Sept. 25, 2023, Judge Stephanos Bibas (sitting by designation in the District of Delaware), determined that fact questions surrounding issues of fair use and tortious interference required a jury to decide media conglomerate...

Read More
Publication

Copyright Law for Influencers and Brands: How Content Creators and Companies Hiring Them Can Navigate Copyright Law for a Successful Partnership

In recent years, the advent of the social media “influencer” has revolutionized advertising. Companies often partner with influencers to market their products, hoping to tap into the influencer’s devoted audience. Likewise, influencers create certain content...

Read More
News

JPMorgan Chase Accuses TransUnion of Stealing 'Trade Secrets'

Intellectual property practice chair Eugene Mar provided expert commentary to American Banker for the article "JPMorgan Chase Accuses TransUnion of Stealing 'Trade Secrets'." In the article, he said: "By filing this as a trade...

Read More
Publication

Is the Copyright Threat to Generative AI Overhyped? Implications of Kadrey v. Meta

In November 2023, Meta successfully had nearly all of the claims against it dismissed in the Kadrey v. Meta Platforms, Inc. suit, a victory with potential implications for other technology companies with generative AI tools...

Read More
News

Scraping Battles: Meta Loses Legal Effort to Halt Harvesting of Personal Profiles

Alex Reese spoke to Matt Fleischer-Black of  Cybersecurity Law Report about the Meta v. Bright Data decision and its impact on U.S. scraping case law. Read the article here (paywall or trial).

Read More
Publication

Hsu Untied Interview With Dan Callaway

Dan Callaway, a partner specializing in intellectual property litigation, was a guest on Hsu Untied , an award-winning podcast hosted and produced by Richard Hsu featuring entrepreneurs, venture capitalists, best-selling authors, and more.  During...

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Earns 2024 Best Law Firms® Rankings

Read More
Publication

Will the Supreme Court Limit Copyright Damages? Implications of Warner Chappell Music, Inc. et al. v. Sherman Nealy et al.

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Warner Chappell Music, Inc. et al. v. Sherman Nealy et al. (Case No. 22-1078) on February 21, 2024. On the surface, the case presents the opportunity...

Read More