Insights
Publications

New California Law Allows Employers to Cure Two Wage Statement Violations Within Limited Period

10/13/2015 Articles

Governor Jerry Brown has signed into law AB 1506, a bill that will allow employers to cure two types of technical itemized wage-statement violations to avoid the risk of costly Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) suits. This law, which takes effect immediately, will benefit employers who take appropriate and timely steps to cure such technical violations. 

The PAGA authorizes an aggrieved employee to bring a civil action to recover specified civil penalties that would otherwise be assessed and collected by the Labor and Workforce Development Agency (LWDA) on behalf of the employee and other current or former employees for the violation of various Labor Code provisions. The PAGA gives the employer the right to cure certain violations before the employee may bring a civil action.

Before AB 1506, alleged violations of Labor Code § 226(a)—mandating the content of payroll statements—were enumerated among the violations lacking opportunity to cure. AB 1506 amends the PAGA so that employers may cure two specific wage statement violations: (1) not including the pay period dates as required by Section 226(a)(6), and (2) not including the correct name and address of the employer as required by Section 226(a)(8). The bill leaves violations of the other seven Section 226(a) requirements (e.g., inclusion of hours worked, applicable hourly rates, net and gross wages, deductions) as not subject to cure. 

Employers may now cure these two violations within 33 days after the employee sends written notice of the alleged violations to the LWDA and employer. Violations are only considered cured upon a showing that the employer has provided a fully compliant, itemized wage statement to each aggrieved employee for each pay period for the three-year period prior to the date of the written notice. The bill limits the employer’s right to cure alleged violations to once in a 12-month period. That 12-month limitation parallels the 12-month statute of limitations period for PAGA actions generally.

The legislative summary cites the bill’s author and proponents as explaining, “[T]his reform would provide the appropriate balance of allowing an employer to correct unintentional errors for minor violations without the threat of a multi-million dollar lawsuit that could put the employer out of business, while still protecting the employee’s ability to obtain accurate information.”

Employers who receive PAGA notices from current or prospective litigants should inspect the notice for wage statement claims based on either a failure to include the pay period dates or the name and address of the employer. If any allegations are based on either of those violations, employers should immediately review their wage statement practices for all employees and take appropriate steps to cure any violations within 33 days.

Firm Highlights

Publication

Important Changes and the Impact of California Industry-Specific Minimum Wage Laws

In the ever-evolving landscape of California labor laws, the minimum wage has once again taken center stage. With the recent state-wide increase to $16 per hour, the Golden State continues to lead the nation...

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Welcomes Benjamin Buchwalter to Growing Employment Group

Read More
Publication

Employment Law Symposium Recordings & Articles

Employers Face Significant New Requirements for Severance Agreements and Non-Competes  (Recording) Conducting Effective, Defensible Investigations (With Lessons Learned from Summary Judgment & Trial)  (Recording) California Employment Law Updates: What to Look Out for in...

Read More
Publication

Navigating California's Evolving Legal Landscape Governing Leaves of Absence

California’s employment laws are no stranger to change, and recent years have witnessed the introduction or modification of various protected leaves by employees. In this article, we will delve into three significant leave categories...

Read More
Publication

Navigating California's New Rebuttable Presumption Law

The ever-evolving landscape of employment laws in California has introduced a notable change with the implementation of a new law that establishes a rebuttable presumption of retaliation in some circumstances. This law, which took...

Read More
Publication

Employment Law Update for Nonprofits With Holly Sutton

Welcome to  EO Radio Show - Your Nonprofit Legal Resource . Charities, foundations, and their founders often request help addressing employment practices and compliance questions. In this episode, host Cynthia Rowland is joined by Holly...

Read More
Publication

Navigating Cannabis in the Workplace: A Guide for California Corporations

The landscape surrounding cannabis in the workplace is rapidly evolving, posing challenges for California corporations and businesses to establish effective policies and procedures. As the use of cannabis, both medical and recreational, becomes more...

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Earns 2024 Best Law Firms® Rankings

Read More
Publication

Navigating California's Workplace Violence Prevention Law

California has introduced a new requirement compelling most employers to implement a workplace violence prevention policy by July 1, 2024. The implications of this law are significant, prompting the need for human resource executives...

Read More
News

Ripple Effects of the Supreme Court’s 2023 Decision on Affirmative Action

Kelly Matayoshi was quoted in the article "Ripple Effects of the Supreme Court’s 2023 Decision on Affirmative Action" in the Bar Association of San Francisco's fall issue of  San Francisco Attorney Magazine . Read...

Read More