Plan Ahead for New Stormwater Permit Requirements Taking Effect on July 1

1/27/2015 Articles

Published in the North Bay Business Journal.

After 13 years of deliberation and drafting, the new California Industrial General Stormwater Permit takes effect on July 1, 2015.  The new Permit requires major changes in the way that businesses engaged in industrial activities plan for, monitor and control stormwater pollution. Companies should prepare for these changes to put themselves on the best footing when the new Permit takes effect.  As they say, “the devil is in the details,” but here is a quick overview of the major changes in the new Permit and the key issues companies should start thinking about.


New Stormwater Plan Requirements


Companies must update their Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPPs) by July 1, 2015.  The new Permit specifies “minimum” Best Management Practices (BMPs) that must be discussed in the SWPPP and implemented at the facility.  Minimum BMPs are commonly known as “non-structural controls”, and include good housekeeping, training, and equipment maintenance.  To the extent that minimum BMPs do not adequately control stormwater pollution, the SWPPP must also include appropriate “advanced” BMPs.  These are generally “structural controls,” such as berms, engineered covers for material and equipment, and treatment technologies. 


Monitoring Changes


The new Permit does away with the old Permit’s requirement for sampling stormwater during the “wet season.”  Going forward, facilities must collect four stormwater samples a year, two during July 1 to December 31, and two during January 1 to June 30.  The Permit describes the pollutants that a facility must monitor for based on its industrial classification.  However, the Permit also specifies additional monitoring requirements based on whether the receiving water that the facility discharges to is designated as “impaired” under the Clean Water Act for one or more pollutants.  If the facility discharges a pollutant that the receiving water is impaired for, the facility must monitor for that pollutant too.


Use of Numeric Action Levels


The biggest change to the new Permit is the incorporation of Numeric Action Limits (NALs) to gauge the effectiveness of a facility’s BMPs to control stormwater pollution.  These are not binding permit limits that will result in a violation if the facility exceeds them.  However, exceeding an NAL does require a facility to take an “Exceedance Response Action” as specified in the Permit to improve existing BMPs or implement new BMPs.  For certain pollutants (pH, oil and grease, and total suspended solids), the Permit specifies an “instantaneous” NAL that triggers action if exceeded in any one of the four required annual samples.  The Permit also specifies “average” NALs for all pollutants (other than pH), that trigger action if exceeded based on the samples collected during the year. 


All facilities will start at “baseline” when the new Permit takes effect on July 1.  If an instantaneous or average NAL for a pollutant is exceeded in a year, the facility will be designated as “Level 1” for that pollutant and take prescribed steps to prepare a report and modify their BMPs and SWPPP.  If the facility has no further exceedances for that pollutant, it will drop back down to baseline status.  However, if a Level 1 facility has a subsequent exceedance of an NAL for the same pollutant, then it moves up to a permanent “Level 2” designation for that pollutant, triggering more onerous assessment and implementation requirements. 


Getting SMARTS


Businesses should also be aware that all Permit-related documents, including the SWPPP, monitoring results, and action plans, must be posted on a publicly accessible and searchable online database run by the State Water Board, congenially known as SMARTS.  Facilities that have been able to fly below the radar and avoid public scrutiny will no longer be able to do so.


Plan Ahead


For companies that already comply with the current stormwater Permit, the general requirements of the new Permit should be familiar.  However, given the substantial changes in the new Permit, facilities should consider preparing for compliance sooner than later. 


In particular, a facility’s SWPPP must meet the new Permit’s requirements on July 1, the day the new Permit takes effect.  There is no grace period, so a facility must revise its SWPPP before then. 


While updating the SWPPP, the facility should also consider reviewing prior monitoring results to determine if it is at risk of exceeding of an NAL for one or more pollutants if similar results are obtained under the new Permit.  This will provide an opportunity to identify activities or areas that are problematic for stormwater management and to take steps improve existing BMPs or devise new ones to reduce pollutant levels before the new Permit takes effect and improve the chance of not moving up from baseline to Level 1 status after the first year.


Facilities may also consider taking a step back to evaluate whether measures can be taken to become exempt from the Permit.  A “no exposure” exemption is available if the facility can demonstrate that all industrial activities at the site take place under cover such that no stormwater comes into contact with raw materials, industrial activities or finished products.  Another option is to demonstrate that the Permit does not apply because the facility is engineered to contain all stormwater and therefore not discharge, or that stormwater discharged from the site does not discharge to a “water of the United States.”  Both exemptions require a facility to submit documentation to the State Water Board in support of the claim.


It is often heard said that “what is old becomes new again.”  In the case of the new Industrial General Stormwater Permit, the changes are extensive and significant, such that existing compliance practices may no longer be sufficient.  Take heed and plan ahead. 


Mathew Swain is a senior associate in the environmental law department at Farella Braun + Martel, a law firm with offices in San Francisco and St. Helena. He can be reached at [email protected] or 415-954-4464.

Firm Highlights


Marine Plastic Pollution: How Global Extended Producer Responsibility Can Help

Nearly nine million tons of plastic waste flow into our oceans each year, arriving in many ways—ranging from polluted rivers and waterways to the wastewater from our washing machines. Once in the ocean, this pervasive...

Read More

What California Wineries Need to Know Now to Prepare for Fire Season

California is at the start of another dry year, with increased likelihood that the North Bay will experience another active fire season. Fires are always a risk and they are always unpredictable — preparing...

Read More

New Proposition 65 Warning Requirements for Cannabis and Hemp-Derived Products

Donald Sobelman and Wendy Hernandez discuss "New Proposition 65 Warning Requirements for Cannabis and Hemp-Derived Products." Proposition 65 requires “clear and reasonable” warnings in California for products containing chemicals on the State’s list of...

Read More

Supreme Court Ruling Expands Reach of Clean Water Act NPDES Permitting

Read the article on California Ag Net , here . In April, the United States Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling clarifying the reach of the federal Clean Water Act. The Court decided that a...

Read More

New Statewide Winery Order: What Wineries Need to Know

Join Buzz Hines and John Ugai, along with guest speakers, Timothy Simpson and Mehran Ebrahimi from GSI Environment Inc, in the discussion on "New Statewide Winery Order: What Wineries Need to Know." The new...

Read More

Farella Lawyers Recognized by Lawdragon as Leading U.S. Environmental & Energy Lawyers

Partners James Colopy and Robert Hines and Of Counsel James Bruen were selected by  Lawdragon  for inclusion in its inaugural “500 Leading U.S. Environmental & Energy Lawyers” list recognizing lawyers who are shaping the future...

Read More

The Winding Trail Home: Marin County Secures Key Multi-Use Trail Access Decision

With Marin County’s Mt. Tamalpais often considered the birthplace of mountain biking, it should not be surprising that the County finds itself at the forefront of California’s battle over multi-use trail access and consequently...

Read More

Key PFAS Regulatory Standards Set in California

In support of California’s efforts to investigate and evaluate the presence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the environment, the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board) has released interim...

Read More

New Screening Levels for Key PFAS Chemicals Will Spur Regulatory Action at Contaminated Sites

In support of the State Water Resources Control Board’s (State Board) efforts to investigate and evaluate the public health effects of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board...

Read More

New EPA Clean Water Act Rule Attempts to Streamline Permitting Process

Earlier this week, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency finalized the “Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification Rule” (Rule). The Rule comes with significant procedural and substantive changes to the certification process for infrastructure projects. Under...

Read More