Upcoming Changes to California Housing Laws – AB 1482 Tenant Protection Act

October 28, 2019 Articles

The Governor recently signed into law several housing-related bills adopted during the 2019-2020 state legislative session. At the start of the session, approximately 200 housing-related bills were introduced, mostly from Bay Area legislators. Many of these proposals were part of the “CASA Compact,” a multi-year, multi-stakeholder effort to address the housing crisis from a Bay Area regional standpoint. The CASA Compact framework is based around three principal outcomes: (1) production of housing at all levels of affordability; (2) preserving existing affordable housing; and (3) protecting vulnerable households from housing instability and displacement. At the end of the legislation session, about a dozen housing bills survived the process and ended up on the Governor’s desk. Ahead of the January 1, 2020 effective date for these bills, we will share you with the details behind some of the upcoming changes in housing law through a series of updates, with this first one focused on tenant protections.

Tenant Protection Act (AB 1482)

Assembly Bill 1482, introduced by Assemblyman David Chiu (D-San Francisco), will put two notable statewide tenant protections in place until the bill automatically sunsets on January 1, 2030: (1) extend just cause eviction protections to tenants living in residential properties not currently covered by just cause eviction laws; and (2) prohibit owners from increasing rent by more than 5%, plus the rate of inflation, or 10% (whichever is less) more than once per 12-month period for tenants who have occupied the same unit for more than 12 months.

Just Cause Eviction Protections

Currently, fewer than 20 jurisdictions within California have just cause eviction laws in place. In the absence of a local rent control ordinance or a fixed-term lease, landlords are permitted to terminate a tenancy unilaterally without stating a reason, and are only subject to advanced notice (30 days for tenants who have occupied the premises for less than one year, or 60 days for tenants who have occupied the premises for one year or more).

AB 1482 will prohibit landlords from terminating a residential tenancy without just cause and providing written notice of the just cause if a tenant has occupied the property for at least 12 months. “Just cause” includes either “at-fault just cause” or “no-fault just cause.”

At-fault just causes include, but are not limited to:

  • default in payment of rent;
  • a breach of a material term of the lease;
  • criminal activity by the tenant on the residential real property;
  • assigning or subletting the premises in violation of the tenant’s lease; or
  • using the premises for an unlawful purpose.

No-fault just causes include, but are not limited to:

  • intent by the property owner (or the owner’s spouse, domestic partner, children, grandchildren, parents, or grandparents) to occupy the residential property (owner move-in eviction);
  • withdrawal of the residential real property from the rental market; or
  • intent to demolish or to substantially remodel the residential real property.

Prior to terminating a tenancy for just cause that is curable, AB 1482 requires that the landlord first gives notice to the tenant with an opportunity to cure. Additionally, the new law requires under a no-fault just cause termination that the property owner do either one of two things: (A) assist the tenant with relocation by providing a direct payment to the tenant; or (B) waive in writing the payment of rent for the final month of the tenancy. The amount of the relocation assistance or rent waiver shall be equal to one month of the tenant’s rent that was in effect when the owner issued the tenancy termination notice.

It should also be noted that residential real property subject to a local ordinance requiring just cause for termination, whether the ordinance has already been adopted or is adopted in the future, will only be subject to either the requirements under AB 1482, or the local ordinance if it is “more protective,” but will not be subject to both state and local law regarding just cause evictions concurrently.

Rent Increases

Under AB 1482, a landlord is not permitted to, over the course of any 12-month period, increase the rental rate for a dwelling or a unit by more than 5%, plus the rate of inflation, or 10%, whichever is lower, of the lowest rental rate charged for that dwelling or unit at any time during the 12 months prior to the effective date of the increase. Additionally, landlords are not permitted to increase rent in more than two increments over that 12-month period.

AB 1482 does not institute any rent restrictions on vacant units. For any new tenancy, landlords can establish the initial rent. The rent increase restriction under AB 1482 applies only after the initial rental rate has been established.


AB 1482 provides several exemptions from the new law, including:

  • *single-family owner-occupied residences and condominiums, including a residence in which the owner-occupant rents or leases no more than two units or bedrooms (including, but not limited to, an accessory dwelling unit or a junior accessory dwelling unit);
    • *single-family homes are not listed as an exemption under the rent increase portion of the bill. However, single-family homes and condominiums are exempted from rent control restrictions under existing state law (the Costa-Hawkins Act).
  • a duplex in which the owner occupied one of the units as the owner’s principal place of residency at the beginning of the tenancy, so long as the owner continues in occupancy;
  • new housing that has been issued a certificate of occupancy within the last 15 years;
  • transient and tourist hotels;
  • housing accommodations in a nonprofit hospital, religious facility, extended care facility, licensed residential care facility for the elderly;
  • dormitories owned and operated by an institution of higher education or a kindergarten and grades 1 to 12, inclusive, school; and
  • housing restricted by deed, regulatory restriction, or other recorded document as affordable housing for households of very low, low, or moderate income.

For more on AB 1482, click here. Stay tuned, as we will next cover the Housing Crisis Act of 2019 (Senate Bill 330).

Firm Highlights


Napa County Land Use Update: What You Should Know About Developments in the Local and State Regulatory Arena (Webinar)

Speakers, Katherine Philippakis, Rick Tooker, and Rachel Lenihan discuss "Napa County Land Use Update: What You Should Know About Developments in the Local and State Regulatory Arena." As property owners plan new or expanded...

Read More

Farella Represents Miller Family on Sale of The Silverado Vineyards

Wine Grapevine Image
Read More

Getting With The Program: How Opportunity Zone Investors Can Navigate Tax Benefits

Investing in the future of an economically distressed community can be rewarding in more ways than one. Not only are investors supporting the growth of an underserved community, but there can also be significant financial benefits...

Read More

Julie Treppa Elected Fellow of American College of Tax Counsel

Julie Treppa headshot
Read More

Farella Attorneys Named to 2022 Northern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars

Thirty-four Farella Braun + Martel lawyers were named to the Super Lawyers and Rising Stars lists of top attorneys in Northern California for 2022. Super Lawyers: Carly Alameda – Business Litigation George Argyris &ndash...

Read More

Farella Names Ashley Breakfield and Cynthia Castillo As Leadership Council on Legal Diversity Pathfinders

Farella Braun + Martel is proud to announce that senior associates  Ashley Breakfield and Cynthia Castillo were selected to be members of the 2022 class of Leadership Council on Legal Diversity (LCLD) Pathfinders. The...

Read More

50 Farella Lawyers in 2023 The Best Lawyers in America® and the Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America™; 4 Lawyer of the Year Awards

Read More

Katherine Philippakis Named Among the Top Women Lawyers in California by Daily Journal

Farella Braun + Martel is proud to announce the selection of partner Katherine Philippakis to the Daily Journal ’s 2022 list of California’s "Top Women Lawyers." The annual list honors the achievements of leading...

Read More

Website lawsuits, events regulations, environmental rules: What’s new in California wine business law

Katherine Philippakis submitted commentary for the North Bay Business Journal article, "Website lawsuits, events regulations, environmental rules: What’s new in California wine business law." Read the full article here .

Read More

Farella Client MedMen Enterprises Inc. Opens Second San Francisco Retail Store

Farella Braun + Martel provided MedMen Enterprises Inc. , a leading cannabis retailer with operations across the nation, with land use and permitting advice to win approval to open its MedMen Union Street retail...

Read More