Insights
Publications

What to Do When Commercial Leases End Up in Bankruptcy

December 28, 2020 Articles
Development Magazine

The COVID-19 pandemic is forcing many businesses to close, leaving landlords in the lurch.

The COVID-19 pandemic continues to shake up the nation’s economy. Long-standing companies such as JC Penney, J. Crew, Neiman Marcus, Modell’s Sporting Goods, Brooks Brothers, Lord & Taylor, Men’s Wearhouse, GNC, California Pizza Kitchen, 24 Hour Fitness, and Gold’s Gym have filed for bankruptcy. Unfortunately, it is highly likely that many more companies, large and small, will file for bankruptcy protection in the coming months.

For landlords of commercial real estate, these bankruptcies can have significant impacts on their rights and remedies under their leases. When confronted with a tenant who has filed for bankruptcy or may be considering it, understanding the basics of those effects is helpful.

Know the Code

The treatment of leases in bankruptcy is governed by the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. When a bankruptcy petition is filed, Section 362 of the code dictates that an “automatic stay” immediately applies. This prevents all actions against the debtor or their property. It also generally means that a landlord cannot take any actions to enforce their rights under a lease, such as sending a notice demanding the payment of rent or other lease obligations incurred before the bankruptcy filing or pursuing an eviction action.

Section 365 of the code governs the assumption, assignment (following assumption), or rejection of a debtor’s real property leases. The general rule is that the debtor must continue to pay rent and other obligations under a lease after petitioning for bankruptcy, until the rejection of the lease, but not delinquent rent and other lease obligations accruing prior to the bankruptcy (which instead are addressed through the bankruptcy claims process). However, the bankruptcy court may permit deferral of such payments until 60 days after filing.

Indeed, in a number of recent retail bankruptcy cases (including Pier 1, 24 Hour Fitness, and Modell’s Sporting Goods), courts have permitted debtors to defer payment of their postbankruptcy lease obligations because they suffered revenue shortfalls following shelter-in-place and similar governmental restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Generally speaking, a tenant has 120 days after a bankruptcy filing to decide whether to assume or reject its real property leases. Following a motion by the debtor or the landlord, a bankruptcy court has the discretion to extend this 120-day period by up to 90 days; however, any further extension requires the consent of the landlord. A lease that is not assumed or rejected within the relevant time period (or confirmation of a Chapter 11 plan if earlier), is deemed rejected, and the tenant is required to immediately vacate the premises.

If the debtor assumes a lease, they are required to cure all lease defaults from before and after the bankruptcy petition, including any delinquent rent and other obligations (with some exceptions for incurable nonmonetary defaults). The debtor also must provide “adequate assurance of future performance” under the lease. There are special requirements if the leased property is in a shopping center, including assurance that any percentage rent due under the lease will not decline substantially; continued compliance with radius, location, use, and exclusivity provisions; and no disruption to the shopping center’s tenant mix or balance.

Once a lease is assumed, any ongoing obligations must be paid in a timely manner, with any unpaid amounts treated as an “administrative expense” of the bankruptcy estate. These generally must be paid in full in order for the debtor to exit bankruptcy under the code.

Importantly, if an assignee satisfies the conditions for lease assumption, a debtor may assign an assumed lease despite provisions of the applicable lease that restrict or condition the tenant’s ability to assign. However, if the leased property is in a shopping center, then the financial condition and operating performance of the proposed assignee must be similar to that of the debtor at the time they became a tenant.

Into the Breach

If the debtor rejects a lease, it is deemed a breach. This allows the landlord to terminate the lease and retake possession of the premises. In addition, the landlord can assert a claim against the bankruptcy estate for damages resulting from the lease rejection. State laws govern the initial calculation of these figures.

However, Section 502 of the code caps such damages at an amount equal to the “rent reserved by such lease, without acceleration, for the greater of one year, or 15%, not to exceed three years, of the remaining term of such lease.” If the landlord’s damages under state law are less than the code’s cap, then they simply have a claim equal to damages under state law. “Rent reserved” for purposes of calculating the cap generally includes base rent, percentage rent, real estate taxes, insurance, and common area maintenance (CAM) charges, especially if the latter three categories are described as “rent” or “additional rent.” After exhausting any security deposit, the landlord’s claim for rejection damages is treated as a “general unsecured claim” under the code, which typically ends up being paid a fraction of the amount owed.

Other issues that may arise in a particular situation include treatment of “stub rent,” which is the portion of rent remaining when a tenant files bankruptcy in the middle of the month; application of security deposits; recovering guaranties or letters of credit securing a lease; and preferential transfer claims for lease payments received shortly before bankruptcy.

Further complicating matters, U.S. bankruptcy courts do not view these issues uniformly. For example, while some courts require debtors to fully pay prorated stub rent, CAM, and property taxes attributable to the portion of the month following a bankruptcy filing, other courts only require payments that fall due after the bankruptcy.

Firm Highlights

News

Farella Partners in Development of La Cocina Municipal Marketplace

Farella Braun + Martel served as the pro bono legal partner to La Cocina in the development of La Cocina Municipal Marketplace in San Francisco’s Tenderloin neighborhood. The nation’s first women-led food hall will...

Read More
News

Farella Advises MedMen to Win San Francisco Cannabis Retail Store Approval

Northern California legal powerhouse Farella Braun + Martel provided national premium cannabis retailer MedMen Enterprises Inc.  with land use and permitting advice to win approval to open a new retail store on Union Street...

Read More
Publication

Prop. 19 Passed, Here Is What You Need to Know

Proposition 19, which passed last month, has important consequences for all real property owners in California. It is important to act quickly before Proposition 19's effective date of February 16, 2021. Proposition 19 has...

Read More
News

Amy Briggs Inducted to American College of Coverage Counsel

Read More
News

Quinn Arntsen Named to North Bay Business Journal’s Forty Under 40

Read More
Publication

Hidden Liens in Custom Crush Relationships: How to Avoid Being Caught Between Creditors

Custom crush is an effective method for vintners to start and grow their label and brand without requiring the capital intensive investment of a dedicated winery. When evaluating potential custom-crush facilities and providers, wine...

Read More
Publication

Eviction Moratorium Updates for California Commercial and Residential Landlords

Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, a variety of eviction moratoriums have been enacted by the local, state, and federal governments. The California state moratorium has recently been extended and modified, and it...

Read More
Publication

Bankruptcy Provisions in COVID Relief Legislation Impacting PPP Loans, Commercial Leases and Preference Claims

With the COVID-19 pandemic stretching on into another year, businesses continue to experience adverse effects. Bankruptcy filings, especially among retailers, were higher than average in 2020, and it is likely that more companies large...

Read More
News

Farella Assists Developers Win San Francisco Transbay Parcel F Tower Approval

Northern California legal powerhouse Farella Braun + Martel represented the joint venture of Hines, Urban Pacific Development, and Goldman Sachs to secure approval for the construction of a 61-story, 800-foot tall mixed-use tower adjacent...

Read More
Publication

The Pitfalls of Boilerplate Lease Agreements

Quinn Arntsen was featured in a GlobeSt Q&A on the pitfalls of boilerplate lease agreements. There are several provisions landlords should insist upon when renegotiating leases. But there are also several common pitfalls including...

Read More