Publications

COVID Relief Granted to Opportunity Zone Investors

July 13, 2020 Articles
Financial Investor

Opportunity Zones are economically-distressed communities designated under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act to provide private investors that deploy capital there with certain tax advantages, provided those investors, and funds, comply with a vast array of time-sensitive deadlines designed to ensure that economic development in the targeted low-income communities occurs in a timely fashion. Enter the COVID-19 pandemic and its ability to delay even the most diligent and well-intentioned investor or fund manager. This national health crisis negatively impacted investors’ appetite for this asset class, given compliance concerns. In response, the Treasury Department issued Notice 2020-39 to provide relief from those deadlines that are particularly difficult to satisfy in the midst of a pandemic.

1.Extension of 180-day Investment Period

Taxpayers defer recognizing capital gains under the Opportunity Zone program if they invest those gains in a Qualified Opportunity Fund within 180 days of when they would be recognized. The notice extends the time period of any taxpayer whose 180 day period expires between April 1, 2020 and December 30, 2020, to December 31, 2002. As a result, investors have more time to explore potential investment opportunities to determine which, if any, make sense given the current economic climate. Funds also have a larger pool of qualified investors to pitch to, as they can now reach out to investors who realized capital gains as late as October of 2019.

2. Reasonable Cause for Failing 90 Percent Test

Investment of capital gains must be made in a Qualified Opportunity Fund, which holds 90% of its assets in the form of certain businesses, or business property, located, or used, in an Opportunity Zone. This 90% test is measured by averaging the percentage of qualified property held by the fund six months after it is formed, or elects to be a Qualified Opportunity Fund, and the last day of its taxable year. If this 90% investment standard is not satisfied, the Qualified Opportunity Fund must pay a penalty for each month that it fails to meet the standard, unless it can establish that it failed to meet the standard due to reasonable cause.

The notice provides that any fund that fails to satisfy the 90% investment standard on a testing date that falls between April 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020, is automatically deemed to have failed the test for reasonable cause. As a result, any Qualified Opportunity Fund may wait to deploy its capital until June 30, 2021, when the economy may be more stable.

3. 30 Month Substantial Improvement Period

Certain tangible property counts toward satisfying the 90% investment standard if it is used in a trade or business, and it is substantially improved within any 30-month period beginning after the date it is acquired. In order to be deemed to be “substantially improved,” the improvements must double the adjusted basis of such property.

The notice tolls the 30-month substantial improvement period between April 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020, thus extending the period in which to improve the property by up to nine months so that developer may stay compliant in light of construction delays.

4. Working Capital Safe Harbor

A Qualified Opportunity Fund often invests in a Qualified Opportunity Fund Businesses, which generally are active trades or businesses with certain ties to an Opportunity Zone, such owning or leasing at least 70% of its assets in the zone and having at least 50% of its gross income derived from conduct in the zone. The business must hold less than 5% of the average of the aggregate unadjusted bases of its property in the form of certain passive assets known as nonqualified financial property, excluding reasonable working capital assets. Under the current rules, a safe harbor exists that allows businesses to treat working capital assets as “reasonable” when, among other things, a written plan is in place that provides for the expenditure of such assets within 31 months (up to 62 months if certain additional requirements are satisfied). If the business is located in a Federally declared disaster area, an additional 24 months is allowed to expend these working capital assets. Satisfaction of this safe harbor also allows the business to treat any working capital held as cash as qualified property towards satisfying the 70% test.

The notice confirms that, as a result of the President’s emergency (rather than disaster) declaration on March 13, 2020, any Qualified Opportunity Zone Business holding working capital assets under a safe harbor arrangement established before December 31, 2020, is entitled to an additional 24 months to expend such assets. Thus, any such business now has up to 55 months to spend cash held under a working capital safe harbor arrangement.

5. 12 Month Reinvestment Period for Qualified Opportunity Funds

If a Qualified Opportunity Fund sells its qualifying property or receives a return of capital distribution with respect to its qualified investment in other businesses, the sale proceeds or distributions count towards satisfying the 90% investment standard if the fund reinvests them in other qualifying property within twelve months. If any plan to reinvest the proceeds in qualifying property is delayed due to a Federally declared disaster, the fund is entitled to an additional 12 months to reinvest the proceeds, provided that the fund invests the proceeds in the manner originally intended before the disaster.

The notice provides that if any Qualified Opportunity Fund’s 12-month reinvestment period includes January 20, 2020, it has an additional 12 months to reinvest sale proceeds, provided the proceeds are reinvested in the same manner as originally intended. This grants relief to only those limited funds who sold property prior to January 20, 2020.

Essentially, Notice 2020-39 grants relief that may alleviate investor concerns regarding whether a long-term investment in an economically-distressed community in the midst of this crisis is prudent, and permits fund managers an opportunity to remain compliant with the program during this pandemic.

Firm Highlights

Publication

New PFAS Federal Drinking Water Standards Create Major Liability and Litigation Risk

The United States Environmental Protection Agency has released a final regulation setting individual drinking water maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for five per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). These MCLs are incredibly stringent due to EPA’s stated concerns...

Read More
News

EPA Designates PFOA and PFOS as Hazardous Substances

Don Sobelman provided expert commentary in the  Chemical & Engineering News article "EPA Designates PFOA and PFOS as Hazardous Substances." Excerpt from the article: Lawyers are warning anyone purchasing an industrial site where PFOA...

Read More
Publication

California Regulation of Charitable Fundraising Platforms Part 2 - Reporting Due Diligence, Recordkeeping, and Disclosure Rules

Welcome to  EO Radio Show - Your Nonprofit Legal Resource . This episode covers the provisions of California’s Charitable Fundraising Platforms law (Gov. Code, § 12599.9) relevant to all covered charitable fundraisers and fundraising...

Read More
Publication

New PFAS Listing Under Superfund Will Lead to Major Expansion of Liability

On April 19, 2024, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) announced its final rule designating perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) as hazardous substances under Section 102(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation...

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Earns San Francisco Green Business Recertification

Read More
Event

AI and Privacy: What Every Company Needs to Do Today

Sushila Chanana and Benjamin Buchwalter will discuss "AI and Privacy: What Every Company Needs to Do Today' at the ACC 2024 Privacy Summit.  This session will introduce basics of AI governance, such as ownership...

Read More
News

Burdened by Debt, Savvy SF Office Owners Get Creative

Restructuring, insolvency, and creditors rights partner Gary Kaplan provided expert commentary in The San Francisco Standard article, "Burdened by Debt, Savvy SF Office Owners Get Creative." In the article, Gary explained that in most cases...

Read More
Publication

California’s Estrada Decision and Impact on Employers and PAGA Claims

Following Estrada v. Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc. , the California Supreme Court’s employee-friendly Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) ruling earlier this year, employers must remain more diligent than ever to prevent and mitigate costly...

Read More
News

Farella Awards 2024 Diversity Scholarships to Bay Area Law Students

Farella Braun + Martel’s Diversity, Equity, Inclusion + Belonging Committee is pleased to announce the recipients of our 2024 Diversity Scholarship grants totaling $45,000 to Bay Area first-year law students Marcus Albino, Saamia Haqiq...

Read More
Event

Unplugged: The Renewable Energy Speaker Series - The IRA's Environmental Justice Incentive Programs

Join Farella Braun + Martel and the Environmental Law Institute for the relaunch Unplugged: The Renewable Energy Speaker Series with Farella’s John Ugai and guest speakers Miana Campbell with U.S. Department of Energy, Maria Castillo with...

Read More