Insights
Publications

California Supreme Court Protects Supervisors From Retaliation Liability

3/6/2008 Articles

This week, the California Supreme Court held that individual managers may not be held personally liable for retaliation under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA).  In Jones v. The Lodge at Torrey Pines Partnership, No. S151022 (Mar. 3, 2008), plaintiff Scott Jones had sued his supervisor, Jean Weiss, and his employer, The Lodge at Torrey Pines, alleging that he had been subjected to sexual orientation harassment.  Jones also claimed that after he complained about the harassment, Weiss retaliated against him by excluding him from meetings and company events, issuing unwarranted written reprimands, and eventually forcing his resignation.

At trial, the case went to the jury with two causes of action: a claim for sexual orientation discrimination against The Lodge, and a claim for retaliation against The Lodge and also against Weiss, as an individual.  The jury awarded Jones $1,395,000 against The Lodge and $155,000 against Weiss personally.  The trial judge overturned the verdict, in part on the ground that an individual defendant - Weiss - could not be liable for retaliation under FEHA.  The California Court of Appeal, however, reinstated the jury's verdict by ruling that FEHA did provide liability against individual supervisors for retaliation.  The Court of Appeal recognized established case law holding that individual supervisors could not be liable for alleged discrimination under the FEHA but found that the FEHA retaliation statute was differently worded in a manner that appeared to authorize individual supervisory liability. 

In a contentious, 4-3 opinion, the California Supreme Court majority rejected this distinction.  The Supreme Court reasoned that the same restrictions that had protected individual supervisors from liability for discrimination claims should also apply to retaliation claims.  The majority barred personal liability because such retaliation claims against individual supervisors "arise out of the performance of necessary personnel management duties."  Therefore, the court reasoned, allowing personal liability would create a conflict of interest for supervisors, who would have to face making a personnel decision that might be best for the company but could create personal risk for them in the form of a retaliation claim.  The court also cited the difficulty in determining which supervisor was responsible for the alleged retaliation, because many personnel decisions are made by several people.  The court held that these reasons "apply equally" if not "even more forcefully" to retaliation claims than to discrimination claims.  The majority saw no reason the California Legislature would make individual supervisors personally liable for retaliation but not for discrimination, and found no support for such a distinction in the legislative history of the statute.  In any case, the court noted, individual supervisors are unlikely to be able to pay plaintiffs large judgments. 

Employers and employees should remember that individual employees (whether or not supervisory) remain liable for workplace harassment.  Supervisors may now, however, make employment decisions without fear of personal liability for either discrimination or retaliation.  The risk of such liability is limited to the employing entity, which is able to institute appropriate human resources and legal safeguards.

Firm Highlights

Publication

Reopening Wine Businesses: Employee and Consumer Data Privacy

Farella's Wine Industry Education Series features Nate Garhart and Jaya Bajaj discussing "Reopening Wine Businesses: Employee and Consumer Data Privacy." The shelter-in-place orders prevented in-person tastings from happening, throwing a curve ball to the wine...

Read More
Publication

7 Tips for Creating a COVID-19 Essential Business Travel Policy

As states are relaxing COVID-19-related restrictions, employers should remain cautious about business travel. California’s public health orders still limit travel to an “urgent matter” or that which is “essential to your permitted work.” Given...

Read More
News

Coronavirus: Can tech allay the dangers of the Bay Area office of the future?

Rebecca Stephens spoke to the San Francisco Chronicle about legal considerations that could potentially hinder a return to physical work as much as technological ones. Link to the article: https://www.sfchronicle.com/business/article/Coronavirus-Can-tech-allay-the-dangers-of-the-15246378.php

Read More
News

52 Farella Braun + Martel Attorneys Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2021

Read More
Publication

Employment Law Updates for Nonprofits in the New Normal

Farella's Nonprofit Education Series features Rebecca Stephens and Jaya Bajaj discussing "Employment Law Updates for Nonprofits in the New Normal." Nonprofit organizations are subject to both state and federal employment laws and regulations. The...

Read More
Publication

California Expands Family and Medical Leave Law to Cover Small Employers

California Governor Gavin Newsom recently signed SB 1383, which expands employees’ leave entitlements under California’s Family Rights Act and New Parent Leave Act. Effective January 1, 2021, these leave provisions will apply to employers with...

Read More
Publication

Guidance on Directive to Defer Payroll Tax Obligations Leaves Unanswered Questions

On August 8, 2020, the President directed the Secretary of the Treasury to authorize the deferment of certain payroll tax withholding, depositing, and payment obligations otherwise incurred on wages and compensation paid between September...

Read More
News

Benchmark Litigation 2021 Ranks Farella Among Top Litigation Firms in California

SAN FRANCISCO, October 12, 2020: Farella Braun + Martel continues to be ranked among the top litigation firms in California in the  Benchmark Litigation  2021 guide. Farella was ranked “Highly Recommended” for Dispute Resolution...

Read More
Event

14th Annual ABA Section of Labor and Employment Law Conference

Holly Sutton is a panelist on the 14th Annual ABA Section of Labor and Employment Law Conference live webinar, "Political Speech at Work: What is Fair and What is Foul." Details: Some believe that...

Read More
Publication

Employment Laws: Understanding Your Rights and Obligations as a Cannabis Employer

Farella's Cannabis Industry Education Series features Rebecca Stephens discussing "Employment Laws: Understanding Your Rights and Obligations as a Cannabis Employer." Cannabis businesses are subject to both state and federal employment laws and regulations. The past few...

Read More