Insights
Publications

New California Employment Laws Effective January 1, 2013

12/5/2012 Articles

This fall, the California Legislature and Governor passed a number of changes to California employment laws, most of which take effect on Jan. 1. Below is a summary of the changes most likely to have a practical impact on employers.

Contractual Salaries for Non-Exempt Employees. On occasion, employers with workers who regularly work a fixed number of overtime hours have opted to pay non-exempt employees a set salary that was intended to cover the workers' pre-agreed overtime hours in addition to standard pay for eight hours. In 2011, a California court of appeal approved just such a written contract, which paid a non-exempt employee a fixed salary that included a certain number of overtime hours built in at a time-and-a-half rate. AB 2103 ends that practice by mandating that, where an employer pays a non-exempt employee a fixed salary, that salary shall constitute compensation for no more than eight hours in a work day and 40 hours in a work week, notwithstanding any agreement to the contrary. Any time worked beyond those periods must be additionally compensated at overtime premium rates. Under California Law, employers must pay non-exempt employees overtime premiums for work exceeding eight hours in a work day or 40 hours in a work week.

Exceptions to Commission Contract Requirement. In 2011, the Legislature passed a bill requiring a written contract any time an employee is to be compensated, in whole or in part, by commissions. The law is set to take effect on January 1, 2013. With the amendments made this year by AB 2675, the statute now provides three exceptions to that rule: (1) short-term productivity bonuses such as are paid to retail clerks; (2) temporary incentives that increase commissions already stated in a written contract (for example, temporary increases to commission rates based on sales promotions at car dealerships); and (3) bonus and profit-sharing plans, as long as they are not a fixed percentage of sales or profits.

Personnel File Inspection. Currently, California law requires that employers provide employees an opportunity to inspect their personnel file within a reasonable period of the employees' request. AB 2674 expands that right in two ways: (1) it clarifies that the inspection right applies to former as well as current employees; and (2) it requires employers to provide a copy of the file rather than simply an opportunity to inspect. Previously, employers needed only to provide copies of documents signed by the employee. Employees must make their requests in writing; employers have 30 days to comply.

Religious Dress and Grooming Practices. AB 1964 requires employers to accommodate religious dress and grooming practices (e.g., head scarves, religious jewelry, beards, etc.), but also clarifies that segregating an employee from other employees or the public is not a reasonable religious accommodation.

Breastfeeding Protected From Discrimination. Under the Labor Code, employers are already obligated to accommodate lactating mothers with break time and a private area for expressing milk. AB 2386 expands the Fair Employment and Housing Act's definition of "sex" for purposes of discrimination protections to include "breastfeeding or medical conditions related to breastfeeding."

Protection of Social Media Passwords. AB 1844 prohibits employers from requesting user names, passwords or other information regarding social media accounts from employees or applicants. The law expressly does not prohibit an employer from inquiring into an employee's use of social media in the context of investigations into "workplace misconduct," though it does not define that term. It also permits employers to require that employees divulge passwords and other information regarding employer-owned equipment and accounts, though again that ownership issue is likely to be complex. Employers should note that the new statute's definition of "social media" is quite broad and includes text messages, email, blogs, photo accounts and online services such as Facebook and Twitter.

Local Minimum Wage Requirements. San Jose recently became the second city in California – and only the fifth in the nation — to set its own minimum wage. Beginning 90 days after the election results are certified (most likely March 2013), employers who maintain a facility in San Jose or who have a business license from the city must pay employees working in San Jose no less than $10 per hour. San Francisco's minimum wage will go up to $10.55 per hour on Jan. 1. Both cities require employers to post a notice of the current wage rate.

Firm Highlights

News

52 Farella Braun + Martel Attorneys Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2021

Read More
Publication

Reopening Wine Businesses: Employee and Consumer Data Privacy

Farella's Wine Industry Education Series features Nate Garhart and Jaya Bajaj discussing "Reopening Wine Businesses: Employee and Consumer Data Privacy." The shelter-in-place orders prevented in-person tastings from happening, throwing a curve ball to the wine...

Read More
Publication

Employment Law Updates for Nonprofits in the New Normal

Farella's Nonprofit Education Series features Rebecca Stephens and Jaya Bajaj discussing "Employment Law Updates for Nonprofits in the New Normal." Nonprofit organizations are subject to both state and federal employment laws and regulations. The...

Read More
Publication

Guidance on Directive to Defer Payroll Tax Obligations Leaves Unanswered Questions

On August 8, 2020, the President directed the Secretary of the Treasury to authorize the deferment of certain payroll tax withholding, depositing, and payment obligations otherwise incurred on wages and compensation paid between September...

Read More
News

Benchmark Litigation 2021 Ranks Farella Among Top Litigation Firms in California

SAN FRANCISCO, October 12, 2020: Farella Braun + Martel continues to be ranked among the top litigation firms in California in the  Benchmark Litigation  2021 guide. Farella was ranked “Highly Recommended” for Dispute Resolution...

Read More
Publication

The Election Season Is Upon Us: Guidance for Managing Political Expression in the California Workplace

In a year of extraordinary events, this election has been more divisive and controversial than any other in recent history. Many employers are grappling with how they should manage political expression in the workplace...

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Ranked Among “Best Law Firms” by U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers

SAN FRANCISCO, November 5, 2020: Farella Braun + Martel earned national and regional rankings across a number of practice areas in the U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers® release of the “Best...

Read More
Publication

Employment Laws: Understanding Your Rights and Obligations as a Cannabis Employer

Farella's Cannabis Industry Education Series features Rebecca Stephens discussing "Employment Laws: Understanding Your Rights and Obligations as a Cannabis Employer." Cannabis businesses are subject to both state and federal employment laws and regulations. The past few...

Read More
Publication

California Expands Family and Medical Leave Law to Cover Small Employers

California Governor Gavin Newsom recently signed SB 1383, which expands employees’ leave entitlements under California’s Family Rights Act and New Parent Leave Act. Effective January 1, 2021, these leave provisions will apply to employers with...

Read More
Publication

7 Tips for Creating a COVID-19 Essential Business Travel Policy

As states are relaxing COVID-19-related restrictions, employers should remain cautious about business travel. California’s public health orders still limit travel to an “urgent matter” or that which is “essential to your permitted work.” Given...

Read More