Publications

New Law Requires California Employers to Provide Paid Sick Leave

9/16/2014 Articles

California Governor Jerry Brown has signed into law the Healthy Workplaces, Healthy Families Act of 2014.  The new law requires almost all California employers to provide paid sick time to most full-time and part-time employees, or face fines and other penalties.  Employers must begin complying with the law by July 1, 2015.  California is the second state (after Connecticut) to require paid sick leave. 

Sick Time Requirement

Effective July 1, 2015, California employers will be required to provide paid time off for:

  1. Diagnosis, care, or treatment of an existing health condition of an employee or an employee’s family member (including grandparent, sibling, registered domestic partner, and foster or adopted child/parent); and
  2. An employee who is the victim of domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking.

This law applies to public and private employers of all sizes in California.  Unlike other medical-leave laws and ordinances, it does not exempt small businesses from its coverage.  Importantly, employees may be entitled to paid sick leave in circumstances not covered by their existing family leave entitlements since the covered medical conditions and definition of “family member” are more expansive than those in the federal and state family leave laws.

The sick time requirement does not apply to workers subject to collective bargaining agreements that provide specified minimum pay and benefit levels, in-home supportive services providers, and certain airline employees.

Accrual and Use of Sick Time

The law requires the accrual of paid sick leave at a rate of at least one hour for every 30 hours worked.  The sick time must be provided to all employees who work over 30 days per year, regardless of whether they are full-time or part-time, exempt or non-exempt.  Exempt employees are presumed to have a 40-hour workweek for accrual purposes unless the employees’ normal workweek is less than 40 hours, in which case the employees will accrue paid sick leave based on their normal workweek.

Employees will be entitled to use accrued paid sick leave beginning after their 90th day of employment. 

Unused sick time must carry over from year to year; however, employers may cap (1) employees’ use of sick time at 24 hours/3 days per year; and (2) accrual of sick time at 48 hours/6 days. 

Instead of tracking accruals and carryover, however, the statute permits employers to provide the full allotment of sick leave at the beginning of each year.  Also, an employer may elect to “lend” sick leave to an employee before it is accrued.

Payment

Sick time is generally paid at the employees’ hourly rate.  However, if the employee had varied hourly rates during the 90 days before taking the sick leave, or is paid commissions, piece rates, or salary, the sick time must be paid at a rate calculated by dividing the employees’ total wages over the past 90 days (excluding overtime pay) by the total hours worked over those same 90 days.

Unlike paid vacation time, unused sick time does not need to be paid when the employee separates from employment, whether by termination, resignation, or retirement.  But, if an employee is rehired within a year, previously accrued sick time must be reinstated.

Information Requirements

Information about accrued and used sick time must be included as part of each employee’s itemized wage statement.  Employers must also include certain new language in the notice to new hires.  The statute also includes workplace posting requirements to inform workers of their right to take paid sick time.

Employers must keep accurate sick time records for 3 years, along with other payroll records.  The Labor Commissioner will have access to these records, and employers must make the records available to their employees.

Enforcement and Penalties

Violations of the sick time law may result in reinstatement, back pay, payment of sick days unlawfully withheld, and additional administrative penalties.  If sick days are unlawfully withheld, employers may be subject to penalties up to $4,000.  If a violation results in “other harm to the employee or person, such as discharge from employment,” an additional administrative penalty up to $4,000 will apply.  Employers that do not promptly comply with the law may be subject to further penalties. 

The Labor Commissioner or Attorney General may bring a civil action against the employer in court, with legal and equitable relief available plus attorney fees, costs, and interest.

Existing Sick Time Policies Probably Sufficient

If an employer already has a sick time policy that meets or exceeds the above requirements, or if it provides undifferentiated paid time off (PTO) in lieu of sick leave, no changes need to be made.  Note, however, that employers who provide undifferentiated PTO in lieu of sick leave must pay all of the PTO upon termination, despite the fact that the new law does not require such payment for differentiated sick leave. 

Even for employers that do not need to make changes to their policies, the new posting and record-keeping requirements will still apply.  The California Labor Commissioner will release a template to use for the posting purposes. 

Firm Highlights

Event

20th Annual Western Boot Camp on Environmental Law

Linda Gilleran is teaching the Energy Law session at the Environmental Law Institute's 20th Annual Western Boot Camp on Environmental Law.

Read More
Event

AI and Privacy: What Every Company Needs to Do Today

Sushila Chanana and Benjamin Buchwalter will discuss "AI and Privacy: What Every Company Needs to Do Today' at the ACC 2024 Privacy Summit.  This session will introduce basics of AI governance, such as ownership...

Read More
Event

Unplugged: The Renewable Energy Speaker Series - The IRA's Environmental Justice Incentive Programs

Join Farella Braun + Martel and the Environmental Law Institute for the relaunch Unplugged: The Renewable Energy Speaker Series with Farella’s John Ugai and guest speakers Miana Campbell with U.S. Department of Energy, Maria Castillo with...

Read More
News

Farella Awards 2024 Diversity Scholarships to Bay Area Law Students

Farella Braun + Martel’s Diversity, Equity, Inclusion + Belonging Committee is pleased to announce the recipients of our 2024 Diversity Scholarship grants totaling $45,000 to Bay Area first-year law students Marcus Albino, Saamia Haqiq...

Read More
Publication

California Regulation of Charitable Fundraising Platforms Part 2 - Reporting Due Diligence, Recordkeeping, and Disclosure Rules

Welcome to  EO Radio Show - Your Nonprofit Legal Resource . This episode covers the provisions of California’s Charitable Fundraising Platforms law (Gov. Code, § 12599.9) relevant to all covered charitable fundraisers and fundraising...

Read More
Publication

New PFAS Listing Under Superfund Will Lead to Major Expansion of Liability

On April 19, 2024, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) announced its final rule designating perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) as hazardous substances under Section 102(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation...

Read More
Publication

California’s Estrada Decision and Impact on Employers and PAGA Claims

Following Estrada v. Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc. , the California Supreme Court’s employee-friendly Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) ruling earlier this year, employers must remain more diligent than ever to prevent and mitigate costly...

Read More
Publication

New PFAS Federal Drinking Water Standards Create Major Liability and Litigation Risk

The United States Environmental Protection Agency has released a final regulation setting individual drinking water maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for five per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). These MCLs are incredibly stringent due to EPA’s stated concerns...

Read More
News

EPA Designates PFOA and PFOS as Hazardous Substances

Don Sobelman provided expert commentary in the  Chemical & Engineering News article "EPA Designates PFOA and PFOS as Hazardous Substances." Excerpt from the article: Lawyers are warning anyone purchasing an industrial site where PFOA...

Read More
News

Burdened by Debt, Savvy SF Office Owners Get Creative

Restructuring, insolvency, and creditors rights partner Gary Kaplan provided expert commentary in The San Francisco Standard article, "Burdened by Debt, Savvy SF Office Owners Get Creative." In the article, Gary explained that in most cases...

Read More