Insights
Firm News

Farella Braun + Martel Files Lawsuit to Hold Down Healthcare Costs

April 8, 2014 Announcement

Complaint alleges that Sutter engages in anticompetitive practices that result in overcharges of nearly 40% to employers for the same services offered by competing hospitals.   

San Francisco (April 8, 2014):  Farella Braun + Martel LLP today joined several other law firms in filing a class action complaint against Sacramento-based Sutter Health, alleging that Sutter engages in anticompetitive conduct in violation of the California Cartwright Act and the state Unfair Competition Law.  

“This is an important case for everyone concerned with the high cost of healthcare.  Sutter’s illegal actions have caused healthcare costs in San Francisco and throughout Northern California to be approximately 38% higher than the cost for the same medical services in Southern California, where Sutter has no hospitals,” said Farella lead attorney John L. Cooper.   

The case, UFCW & Employers Benefits Trust v. Sutter Health, et al., Case No. 14-538451, (Link to Complaint) was filed on behalf of a class of “Self-Funded Payors,” also known as self-insured entities, which provide healthcare benefits to their employees.  These employers are typically larger businesses that paid Sutter’s higher prices when their employees used the services of any of Sutter’s 27 general acute care hospitals in Northern California.   

According to the complaint, Sutter has violated the law by prohibiting employers from knowing in advance the cost of particular procedures and from offering their employees incentives to choose Sutter’s lower-priced competitors..  Sutter’s practices maintain inflated prices insulated from competition by other hospitals.  Sutter also forces healthcare insurance providers to include all Sutter hospitals in their provider networks regardless of employer and patient preferences for only certain Sutter hospitals.  Together, these contracting practices unlawfully restrain competition and constitute price tampering in violation of California’s antitrust and unfair competition laws.  

The lawyers at Farella representing the plaintiffs include John L. Cooper, Roderick M. Thompson, Christopher C. Wheeler, Alex Reese, and Janice W. Reicher.  Richard L. Grossman of Pillsbury & Coleman is the lead attorney for the class, which is also represented by attorneys at Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll and Davis Cowell & Bowe. 

Farella Braun + Martel represents clients throughout the United States and abroad in sophisticated business transactions and complex commercial, civil and criminal litigation. Farella lawyers are known for their imaginative legal solutions, dynamism and intellectual creativity. With an unwavering service ethic and interdisciplinary team approach, the firm is committed to advancing clients' objectives in the most effective, coordinated and efficient manner. Founded in 1962, Farella is headquartered in San Francisco and maintains an office in the Napa Valley focused on the wine industry. www.fbm.com 

Contacts: 
Melinda Hepp / Traci Stuart   
Blattel Communications    
415.397.4811     
[email protected] / [email protected]

Cheryl Loof
Farella Braun + Martel
415.954.4433
[email protected]

Resources

Firm Highlights

Publication

Landlord-Tenant Dispute Resolution

Farella's Real Estate Webinar Series features Tony Schoenberg discussing "Landlord-Tenant Disputes and Challenges." The laws governing landlord-tenant relationships are complicated. Understanding your rights and legal obligations will help you protect yourself, your rental business, and...

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Shortlisted for Three 2021 Benchmark Litigation Awards

Northern California legal powerhouse Farella Braun + Martel has been shortlisted for three 2021 Benchmark Litigation awards. The firm was shortlisted for “San Francisco Firm of the Year” and in the California White-Collar Crime...

Read More
Publication

Jurors, Justice and Technology

Douglas Young, Farella partner and president of the American College of Trial Lawyers, spoke with podcast host Howard Miller about requirements in jury selection and technology for jury and non-jury trials. Listen to the...

Read More
News

Douglas Young Appointed Special Master in Wit v. United Behavioral Health

Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California has appointed Douglas R. Young to serve as special master in the Wit v. United Behavioral...

Read More
Publication

Complying With the TCPA After the Facebook Supreme Court Decision

Many cannabis dispensaries rely heavily on text messaging marketing programs to reach their customers and to create loyalty in an increasingly competitive market. While text messaging programs may be an effective marketing tool, they...

Read More
News

Nevada Links Wins Summary Judgment Motion in Case Brought by United States

Northern California legal powerhouse Farella Braun + Martel successfully defended Nevada Links, Inc., the owner of a championship golf course in Las Vegas, Nevada, in a $100 million lawsuit brought by the United States...

Read More
Publication

Pandemic Restriction Challenges Face Uphill Battle in California

On Dec.16, 2020, in Midway Venture LLC v. County of San Diego, the San Diego Superior Court preliminarily enjoined enforcement of two COVID-19-related California public health restrictions as applied to two adult entertainment businesses...

Read More
News

Farella Names Rebecca Stephens and Nadia Arid As LCLD 2021 Pathfinders

Farella Braun + Martel is proud to announce that senior associate Rebecca Stephens and associate Nadia Arid were selected to be members of the 2021 class of Leadership Council on Legal Diversity (LCLD) Pathfinders...

Read More
Publication

How Antitrust and Unfair Competition Laws Affect Platform Providers’ Relationships With ISVs, API Developers, and Scrapers

A wide variety of business and consumer platforms host mutually beneficial ecosystems. But these ecosystems are also fraught with antitrust risk that arises when platforms try to terminate or modify the terms of third-party...

Read More
Publication

New Year, New CMS Price Transparency Rule For Hospitals

Transparency in health care pricing can help patients make informed decisions, increase competition, and drive down the cost of health care. Accordingly, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has promulgated a new...

Read More