News

Farella Braun + Martel Files Lawsuit to Hold Down Healthcare Costs

April 8, 2014 Announcement

Complaint alleges that Sutter engages in anticompetitive practices that result in overcharges of nearly 40% to employers for the same services offered by competing hospitals.   

San Francisco (April 8, 2014):  Farella Braun + Martel LLP today joined several other law firms in filing a class action complaint against Sacramento-based Sutter Health, alleging that Sutter engages in anticompetitive conduct in violation of the California Cartwright Act and the state Unfair Competition Law.  

“This is an important case for everyone concerned with the high cost of healthcare.  Sutter’s illegal actions have caused healthcare costs in San Francisco and throughout Northern California to be approximately 38% higher than the cost for the same medical services in Southern California, where Sutter has no hospitals,” said Farella lead attorney John L. Cooper.   

The case, UFCW & Employers Benefits Trust v. Sutter Health, et al., Case No. 14-538451, (Link to Complaint) was filed on behalf of a class of “Self-Funded Payors,” also known as self-insured entities, which provide healthcare benefits to their employees.  These employers are typically larger businesses that paid Sutter’s higher prices when their employees used the services of any of Sutter’s 27 general acute care hospitals in Northern California.   

According to the complaint, Sutter has violated the law by prohibiting employers from knowing in advance the cost of particular procedures and from offering their employees incentives to choose Sutter’s lower-priced competitors..  Sutter’s practices maintain inflated prices insulated from competition by other hospitals.  Sutter also forces healthcare insurance providers to include all Sutter hospitals in their provider networks regardless of employer and patient preferences for only certain Sutter hospitals.  Together, these contracting practices unlawfully restrain competition and constitute price tampering in violation of California’s antitrust and unfair competition laws.  

The lawyers at Farella representing the plaintiffs include John L. Cooper, Roderick M. Thompson, Christopher C. Wheeler, Alex Reese, and Janice W. Reicher.  Richard L. Grossman of Pillsbury & Coleman is the lead attorney for the class, which is also represented by attorneys at Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll and Davis Cowell & Bowe. 

Farella Braun + Martel represents clients throughout the United States and abroad in sophisticated business transactions and complex commercial, civil and criminal litigation. Farella lawyers are known for their imaginative legal solutions, dynamism and intellectual creativity. With an unwavering service ethic and interdisciplinary team approach, the firm is committed to advancing clients' objectives in the most effective, coordinated and efficient manner. Founded in 1962, Farella is headquartered in San Francisco and maintains an office in the Napa Valley focused on the wine industry. www.fbm.com 

Contacts: 
Melinda Hepp / Traci Stuart   
Blattel Communications    
415.397.4811     
[email protected] / [email protected]

Cheryl Loof
Farella Braun + Martel
415.954.4433
[email protected]

Resources

Firm Highlights

Publication

Data Centers Are “Critical Infrastructure,” and That May Help Mitigate Business Impacts From COVID-19

With millions of Americans staying at home during the COVID-19 crisis, news outlets and internet infrastructure companies are all reporting significant increases in internet usage.  For example, Cloudflare data from mid-March showed an 18...

Read More
News

Eight Farella Braun + Martel Lawyers Listed in Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch 2021

SAN FRANCISCO/ST. HELENA, CA, August 20, 2020: Eight Farella Braun + Martel lawyers were listed in the inaugural Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch . This recognition is awarded to attorneys who are earlier in...

Read More
Publication

Monetizing University Patent Portfolios During the Economic Downturn

Colleges and universities may be leaving money on the table with under-utilized patent portfolios. The time is right, as the law has shifted in favor of patent owners, both in inter partes review litigation...

Read More
News

Ninth Circuit Grants Re-Trial for Death Row Inmate

Court rules prosecutor engaged in unconstitutional racial discrimination during jury selection. Farella Braun + Martel’s Pro Bono Program has won another significant victory for Marvin Pete Walker Jr., one of the longest-serving inmates on...

Read More
Publication

How Antitrust and Unfair Competition Laws Affect Platform Providers’ Relationships With ISVs, API Developers, and Scrapers

A wide variety of business and consumer platforms host mutually beneficial ecosystems. But these ecosystems are also fraught with antitrust risk that arises when platforms try to terminate or modify the terms of third-party...

Read More
Publication

Tips for Efficiently Managing New Trade Secret Risks Created by Shelter-In-Place Restrictions and Remote Working

On April 14, 2020, California Governor Gavin Newsom outlined the six “critical indicators” the state will monitor during the next phase of its COVID-19 response as it considers when to modify its statewide shelter-in-place...

Read More
Publication

Protecting Your Internal Intellectual Property Investigation: Privilege and Work Product Under California and Federal Law

As California begins preparing to ease shelter-in-place restrictions, the state’s technology industry is facing the most challenging economic circumstances in recent memory. The state’s technology companies may place new demands on in-house intellectual property...

Read More
Publication

Tech Companies Should Strongly Consider Monetizing Their Patent Portfolios During the Economic Downturn

The COVID-19 pandemic and widespread shelter-in-place orders have hit every corner of the country’s economy, including tech companies of all sizes. Many tech companies have traditionally maintained large patent portfolios to enhance company value...

Read More