Publications

California Extends COVID-19 Leave Through December 31, 2022

October 31, 2022 Articles

Governor Gavin Newsom has signed AB 152 into law, extending Supplemental Paid Sick Leave (“SPSL”) through December 31, 2022. SPSL, which requires California employers with over 26 employees to provide up to 80 hours paid leave for qualifying COVID-19 reasons to covered employees, was previously set to expire on September 30. 

Employees are entitled to use SPSL for a variety of reasons, including when they take time off to get the vaccine, if they are out sick due to COVID-19, or if they are caring for a family member who is sick due to COVID-19. More details can be found here. Note that SPSL must be provided in addition to any existing sick leave or PTO bank. If qualified employees previously used regular sick leave or PTO for COVID-19 related absences in 2022, they are entitled to a credit for those leave hours. 

While AB 152 allows employees more time to access their allotted SPSL hours, it does not entitle employees who have already accessed their leave bank to more or renewed hours. Additionally, the qualifying leave reasons, criteria for coverage, and definitions remain the same.

AB 152 clarifies employers’ ability to deny additional SPSL where an employee fails to provide additional diagnostic testing in certain cases. Covered employees are entitled to 40 hours of COVID-19 leave for qualifying reasons without having to provide documentation of a positive test. Employees are entitled to an additional 40 hours of SPSL if the covered employee, or a family member whom the employee is caring for, tests positive for COVID-19. Employers are not required to provide the additional SPSL if the employee refuses to provide documentation of the positive test result. Additionally, employers are authorized to require the covered employee who tests positive (or is caring for a positive family member) to submit a second test at least five days after first testing positive. Under AB 152, if the employee’s second test is positive, employers are authorized to request an additional diagnostic test within 24 hours of the second test. The employer is required to provide both tests at no cost to the employee. If the employee fails to take the tests authorized by the employer as described, the employer may deny SPSL for the days after the employer provides the test.

Finally, AB 152 establishes a COVID-19 relief grant program for qualifying small business and nonprofits that are incurring costs for COVID-19 SPSL, to be administered by the Governor's Office of Business and Economic Development. This provision will be repealed on January 1, 2024.

Firm Highlights

News

Farella Braun + Martel Recognized in Benchmark Litigation 2023

Farella Braun + Martel continues to be ranked among the top litigation firms in California in the  Benchmark Litigation  2023 guide. Farella was ranked “Highly Recommended” for Dispute Resolution in California and earned a...

Read More
News

Jaya Bajaj Named to Lawyers of Color Hot List 2022

Read More
Publication

California Extends Presumption of COVID-19 as Workers’ Compensation Injury and Modifies Notice Requirements for Potential Exposure

In addition to AB 152 extending COVID-19 leave through December 31, 2022 , Governor Gavin Newsom has also signed into law two other COVID-related bills—AB 1751 and AB 2693—affecting employers’ policies regarding employees who...

Read More
Publication

New Laws and Compliance Updates for California Employers in 2023

California has passed several new or amended employment laws covering topics ranging from off-duty marijuana use, reproductive rights, California Family Rights Act, COVID-19, criminal law and the workplace, new avenues of enforcement against employers...

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Announces 2023 New Partner Class

Read More
Publication

California’s New Pay Transparency Law

Welcome to EO Radio Show – Your Nonprofit Legal Resource . Every January brings a slew of new laws that take effect at the federal and state level, and it seems that there are...

Read More
Publication

Employers Should Review Common Severance Agreement Terms Due to New NLRB Decision

Historically, employers have routinely included confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions in severance agreements with departing employees. Such provisions can be important for protecting sensitive personnel data or proprietary business information from disclosure. But in light...

Read More
Publication

Under FTC’s New Proposed Rule, Employers Will No Longer Be Able to Rely on Noncompete Agreements

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has proposed a rule that would prohibit the use of noncompete agreements in employment contracts. Noncompete agreements prevent employees and independent contractors from pursuing certain forms of employment &ndash...

Read More
News

Farella Braun + Martel Earns 2023 U.S. News – Best Lawyers® "Best Law Firms" Rankings

Read More
Publication

Failures Are Valuable IP: Protect Your Startup’s Negative Trade Secrets

Technology companies and start-ups are familiar with protecting inventions with patents, and protecting their secret formulas, source code, and algorithms as trade secrets. But tech companies may not be aware of another powerful form of...

Read More