Publications

California Extends COVID-19 Leave Through December 31, 2022

October 31, 2022 Articles

Governor Gavin Newsom has signed AB 152 into law, extending Supplemental Paid Sick Leave (“SPSL”) through December 31, 2022. SPSL, which requires California employers with over 26 employees to provide up to 80 hours paid leave for qualifying COVID-19 reasons to covered employees, was previously set to expire on September 30. 

Employees are entitled to use SPSL for a variety of reasons, including when they take time off to get the vaccine, if they are out sick due to COVID-19, or if they are caring for a family member who is sick due to COVID-19. More details can be found here. Note that SPSL must be provided in addition to any existing sick leave or PTO bank. If qualified employees previously used regular sick leave or PTO for COVID-19 related absences in 2022, they are entitled to a credit for those leave hours. 

While AB 152 allows employees more time to access their allotted SPSL hours, it does not entitle employees who have already accessed their leave bank to more or renewed hours. Additionally, the qualifying leave reasons, criteria for coverage, and definitions remain the same.

AB 152 clarifies employers’ ability to deny additional SPSL where an employee fails to provide additional diagnostic testing in certain cases. Covered employees are entitled to 40 hours of COVID-19 leave for qualifying reasons without having to provide documentation of a positive test. Employees are entitled to an additional 40 hours of SPSL if the covered employee, or a family member whom the employee is caring for, tests positive for COVID-19. Employers are not required to provide the additional SPSL if the employee refuses to provide documentation of the positive test result. Additionally, employers are authorized to require the covered employee who tests positive (or is caring for a positive family member) to submit a second test at least five days after first testing positive. Under AB 152, if the employee’s second test is positive, employers are authorized to request an additional diagnostic test within 24 hours of the second test. The employer is required to provide both tests at no cost to the employee. If the employee fails to take the tests authorized by the employer as described, the employer may deny SPSL for the days after the employer provides the test.

Finally, AB 152 establishes a COVID-19 relief grant program for qualifying small business and nonprofits that are incurring costs for COVID-19 SPSL, to be administered by the Governor's Office of Business and Economic Development. This provision will be repealed on January 1, 2024.

Firm Highlights

News

Winston Liaw Named a Leadership Council on Legal Diversity Fellow

Northern California legal powerhouse Farella Braun + Martel is proud to announce that Winston Liaw has been named a Leadership Council on Legal Diversity (LCLD) Fellow for 2024. Winston joins a select group of...

Read More
News

Scraping Battles: Meta Loses Legal Effort to Halt Harvesting of Personal Profiles

Alex Reese spoke to Matt Fleischer-Black of  Cybersecurity Law Report about the Meta v. Bright Data decision and its impact on U.S. scraping case law. Read the article here (paywall or trial).

Read More
Publication

It Wasn’t Me, It Was the AI: Intellectual Property and Data Privacy Concerns With Nonprofits’ Use of Artificial Intelligence Systems

In today's rapidly changing technological landscape, artificial intelligence (AI) is making headlines and being discussed constantly. To be sure, AI provides a powerful tool to nonprofits in creating content and exploiting for countless cost-effective...

Read More
News

Farella 2024 Partner Elevations: Cynthia Castillo and Greg LeSaint

Northern California legal powerhouse Farella Braun + Martel is pleased to announce the election of two lawyers to partnership effective Jan. 1: Cynthia Castillo and Greg LeSaint. “We are thrilled to elevate Cynthia and...

Read More
Publication

Fair Use Question Goes to Trial in AI Copyright Lawsuit – Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence

On September 25, 2023, a United States Circuit Judge determined that fact questions surrounding issues of fair use and tortious interference required a jury to decide media conglomerate Thomson Reuters’s lawsuit against Ross Intelligence...

Read More
News

Farella Wins Complete Defense Ruling at Trial for Smart Meter Technology Company

Northern California legal powerhouse Farella Braun + Martel secured a complete defense victory for a smart meter technology company following a two-week bench trial in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of California...

Read More
Publication

California Proposes New AI & Automated Decision-Making Technology Regulations

The California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) released its draft  regulatory framework for automated decision-making technology (ADMT) on November 27. These regulations are a preview of what new requirements may look like for companies currently...

Read More
Publication

Is the Copyright Threat to Generative AI Overhyped? Implications of Kadrey v. Meta

In November 2023, Meta successfully had nearly all of the claims against it dismissed in the Kadrey v. Meta Platforms, Inc. suit, a victory with potential implications for other technology companies with generative AI tools...

Read More
Publication

Major Decision Affects Law of Scraping and Online Data Collection, Meta Platforms v. Bright Data

On January 23, 2024, the court in Meta Platforms Inc. v. Bright Data Ltd. , Case No. 3:23-cv-00077-EMC (N.D. Cal.), issued a summary judgment ruling with potentially wide-ranging ramifications for the law of scraping and...

Read More
Publication

A Summary of New Laws Coming for California Employers in 2024

In 2023, California has adopted several new employment laws either introducing new employee protections or codifying existing practices into state law. With these changes, employers will need to examine and adjust some of their...

Read More